PURPOSE: Studies comparing two or more vaccine platforms have historically evaluated each platform based on its ability to induce an immune response and may conclude that one vaccine is more efficacious than the other(s), leading to a recommendation for development of the more effective vaccine for clinical studies. Alternatively, these studies have documented the advantages of a diversified prime and boost regimen due to amplification of the antigen-specific T-cell population. We hypothesize here that two vaccine platforms targeting the same antigen might induce shared and distinct antigen-specific T-cell populations, and examined the possibility that two distinct vaccines could be used concomitantly. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using recombinant poxvirus and yeast vaccines, we compared the T-cell populations induced by these two platforms in terms of serum cytokine response, T-cell gene expression, T-cell receptor phenotype, antigen-specific cytokine expression, T-cell avidity, and T-cell antigen-specific tumor cell lysis. RESULTS: These studies demonstrate for the first time that vaccination with a recombinant poxvirus platform (rV/F-CEA/TRICOM) or a heat-killed yeast vaccine platform (yeast-CEA) elicits T-cell populations with both shared and unique phenotypic and functional characteristics. Furthermore, both the antigen and the vector play a role in the induction of distinct T-cell populations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrate that concurrent administration of two vaccines targeting the same antigen induces a more diverse T-cell population that leads to enhanced antitumor efficacy. These studies provide the rationale for future clinical studies investigating concurrent administration of vaccine platforms targeting a single antigen to enhance the antigen-specific immune response.
PURPOSE: Studies comparing two or more vaccine platforms have historically evaluated each platform based on its ability to induce an immune response and may conclude that one vaccine is more efficacious than the other(s), leading to a recommendation for development of the more effective vaccine for clinical studies. Alternatively, these studies have documented the advantages of a diversified prime and boost regimen due to amplification of the antigen-specific T-cell population. We hypothesize here that two vaccine platforms targeting the same antigen might induce shared and distinct antigen-specific T-cell populations, and examined the possibility that two distinct vaccines could be used concomitantly. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using recombinant poxvirus and yeast vaccines, we compared the T-cell populations induced by these two platforms in terms of serum cytokine response, T-cell gene expression, T-cell receptor phenotype, antigen-specific cytokine expression, T-cell avidity, and T-cell antigen-specific tumor cell lysis. RESULTS: These studies demonstrate for the first time that vaccination with a recombinant poxvirus platform (rV/F-CEA/TRICOM) or a heat-killed yeast vaccine platform (yeast-CEA) elicits T-cell populations with both shared and unique phenotypic and functional characteristics. Furthermore, both the antigen and the vector play a role in the induction of distinct T-cell populations. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrate that concurrent administration of two vaccines targeting the same antigen induces a more diverse T-cell population that leads to enhanced antitumor efficacy. These studies provide the rationale for future clinical studies investigating concurrent administration of vaccine platforms targeting a single antigen to enhance the antigen-specific immune response.
Authors: J L Marshall; R J Hoyer; M A Toomey; K Faraguna; P Chang; E Richmond; J E Pedicano; E Gehan; R A Peck; P Arlen; K Y Tsang; J Schlom Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: V Dutoit; V Rubio-Godoy; P Y Dietrich; A L Quiqueres; V Schnuriger; D Rimoldi; D Liénard; D Speiser; P Guillaume; P Batard; J C Cerottini; P Romero; D Valmori Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: L M Mylin; T D Schell; D Roberts; M Epler; A Boesteanu; E J Collins; J A Frelinger; S Joyce; S S Tevethia Journal: J Virol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Michael B Bernstein; Mala Chakraborty; Elizabeth K Wansley; Zhimin Guo; Alex Franzusoff; Sven Mostböck; Helen Sabzevari; Jeffrey Schlom; James W Hodge Journal: Vaccine Date: 2007-12-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Andressa Ardiani; Sofia R Gameiro; Claudia Palena; Duane H Hamilton; Anna Kwilas; Thomas H King; Jeffrey Schlom; James W Hodge Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Benedetto Farsaci; Renee N Donahue; Michael A Coplin; Italia Grenga; Lauren M Lepone; Alfredo A Molinolo; James W Hodge Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Christopher R Heery; Claudia Palena; Sheri McMahon; Renee N Donahue; Lauren M Lepone; Italia Grenga; Ulrike Dirmeier; Lisa Cordes; Jenn Marté; William Dahut; Harpreet Singh; Ravi A Madan; Romaine I Fernando; Duane H Hamilton; Jeffrey Schlom; James L Gulley Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 12.531