Literature DB >> 19755959

Microinjection techniques for studying mitosis in the Drosophila melanogaster syncytial embryo.

Ingrid Brust-Mascher1, Jonathan M Scholey.   

Abstract

This protocol describes the use of the Drosophila melanogaster syncytial embryo for studying mitosis. Drosophila has useful genetics with a sequenced genome, and it can be easily maintained and manipulated. Many mitotic mutants exist, and transgenic flies expressing functional fluorescently (e.g. GFP) - tagged mitotic proteins have been and are being generated. Targeted gene expression is possible using the GAL4/UAS system. The Drosophila early embryo carries out multiple mitoses very rapidly (cell cycle duration, asymptotically equal to 10 min). It is well suited for imaging mitosis, because during cycles 10-13, nuclei divide rapidly and synchronously without intervening cytokinesis at the surface of the embryo in a single monolayer just underneath the cortex. These rapidly dividing nuclei probably use the same mitotic machinery as other cells, but they are optimized for speed; the checkpoint is generally believed to not be stringent, allowing the study of mitotic proteins whose absence would cause cell cycle arrest in cells with a strong checkpoint. Embryos expressing GFP labeled proteins or microinjected with fluorescently labeled proteins can be easily imaged to follow live dynamics (Fig. 1). In addition, embryos can be microinjected with function-blocking antibodies or inhibitors of specific proteins to study the effect of the loss or perturbation of their function. These reagents can diffuse throughout the embryo, reaching many spindles to produce a gradient of concentration of inhibitor, which in turn results in a gradient of defects comparable to an allelic series of mutants. Ideally, if the target protein is fluorescently labeled, the gradient of inhibition can be directly visualized. It is assumed that the strongest phenotype is comparable to the null phenotype, although it is hard to formally exclude the possibility that the antibodies may have dominant effects in rare instances, so rigorous controls and cautious interpretation must be applied. Further away from the injection site, protein function is only partially lost allowing other functions of the target protein to become evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19755959      PMCID: PMC3150050          DOI: 10.3791/1382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  14 in total

1.  Functional coordination of three mitotic motors in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  D J Sharp; H M Brown; M Kwon; G C Rogers; G Holland; J M Scholey
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 2.  Microinjection methods for analyzing the functions of kinesins in early embryos.

Authors:  R L Morris; H M Brown; B D Wright; D J Sharp; W Sullivan; J M Scholey
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2001

3.  Microtubule flux and sliding in mitotic spindles of Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Jonathan M Scholey
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  GAL4 system in Drosophila: a fly geneticist's Swiss army knife.

Authors:  Joseph B Duffy
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Antagonistic microtubule-sliding motors position mitotic centrosomes in Drosophila early embryos.

Authors:  D J Sharp; K R Yu; J C Sisson; W Sullivan; J M Scholey
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Model for anaphase B: role of three mitotic motors in a switch from poleward flux to spindle elongation.

Authors:  I Brust-Mascher; G Civelekoglu-Scholey; M Kwon; A Mogilner; J M Scholey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Fluorescent speckle microscopy, a method to visualize the dynamics of protein assemblies in living cells.

Authors:  C M Waterman-Storer; A Desai; J C Bulinski; E D Salmon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-11-05       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  D J Sharp; G C Rogers; J M Scholey
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Kinesin-5-dependent poleward flux and spindle length control in Drosophila embryo mitosis.

Authors:  Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Patrizia Sommi; Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Jonathan M Scholey
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  The bipolar kinesin, KLP61F, cross-links microtubules within interpolar microtubule bundles of Drosophila embryonic mitotic spindles.

Authors:  D J Sharp; K L McDonald; H M Brown; H J Matthies; C Walczak; R D Vale; T J Mitchison; J M Scholey
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-01-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  17 in total

1.  Coupling between microtubule sliding, plus-end growth and spindle length revealed by kinesin-8 depletion.

Authors:  Haifeng Wang; Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Dhanya Cheerambathur; Jonathan M Scholey
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-11

2.  A single Drosophila embryo extract for the study of mitosis ex vivo.

Authors:  Ivo A Telley; Imre Gáspár; Anne Ephrussi; Thomas Surrey
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  A mitotic kinesin-6, Pav-KLP, mediates interdependent cortical reorganization and spindle dynamics in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Patrizia Sommi; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Mijung Kwon; Sandra Morales-Mulia; Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Alex Mogilner
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  A method for reversible drug delivery to internal tissues of Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Victoria K Schulman; Eric S Folker; Mary K Baylies
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.160

5.  Studying mitotic checkpoint by illustrating dynamic kinetochore protein behavior and chromosome motion in living Drosophila syncytial embryos.

Authors:  Maureen Sinclair; Jun-Yong Huang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Anaphase B spindle dynamics in Drosophila S2 cells: Comparison with embryo spindles.

Authors:  Jane de Lartigue; Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Jonathan M Scholey
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 5.130

7.  Actomyosin-dependent cortical dynamics contributes to the prophase force-balance in the early Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Patrizia Sommi; Dhanya Cheerambathur; Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Alex Mogilner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prometaphase spindle maintenance by an antagonistic motor-dependent force balance made robust by a disassembling lamin-B envelope.

Authors:  Gul Civelekoglu-Scholey; Li Tao; Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Roy Wollman; Jonathan M Scholey
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  A nuclear-derived proteinaceous matrix embeds the microtubule spindle apparatus during mitosis.

Authors:  Changfu Yao; Uttama Rath; Helder Maiato; David Sharp; Jack Girton; Kristen M Johansen; Jørgen Johansen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Improvised microinjection technique for mosquito vectors.

Authors:  S Sampath Kumar; H P Puttaraju
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.