Literature DB >> 19754417

How to recognize and workaround pitfalls in QSAR studies: a critical review.

T Scior1, J L Medina-Franco, Q-T Do, K Martínez-Mayorga, J A Yunes Rojas, P Bernard.   

Abstract

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) are based on the hypothesis that changes in molecular structure reflect proportional changes in the observed response or biological activity. In order to successfully conduct QSAR studies certain conditions have to be met that are not frequently reported in the literature. This suggests that some authors are not aware of the principle flaws, occasional shortcomings, and circumstantial downsides of QSAR methods. The present paper focuses on prerequisites to set up correct models and on limitations of model applications. Their implications are systematically described and illustrated as pitfalls that have strong implications in QSAR, and possible solutions are suggested. The paper is focused on small scale 2D- and 3D-QSAR studies for lead optimization. The work is enriched with comprehensive comments and non-mathematical explanations for the computer practitioner in Medicinal Chemistry.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19754417     DOI: 10.2174/092986709789578213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  21 in total

1.  Estimating n-octanol-water partition coefficients for neutral highly hydrophobic chemicals using measured n-butanol-water partition coefficients.

Authors:  Kaila B Hanson; Dale J Hoff; Tylor J Lahren; David R Mount; Anthony J Squillace; Lawrence P Burkhard
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  Lipid simulations: a perspective on lipids in action.

Authors:  Ilpo Vattulainen; Tomasz Rog
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Predictive Modeling of Estrogen Receptor Binding Agents Using Advanced Cheminformatics Tools and Massive Public Data.

Authors:  Kathryn Ribay; Marlene T Kim; Wenyi Wang; Daniel Pinolini; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2016-03-08

4.  Computational ligand-based rational design: Role of conformational sampling and force fields in model development.

Authors:  Jihyun Shim; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 5.  Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays.

Authors:  Yen Sia Low; Alexander Yeugenyevich Sedykh; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  How to deal with low-resolution target structures: using SAR, ensemble docking, hydropathic analysis, and 3D-QSAR to definitively map the αβ-tubulin colchicine site.

Authors:  Chenxiao Da; Susan L Mooberry; John T Gupton; Glen E Kellogg
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Conditional probabilistic analysis for prediction of the activity landscape and relative compound activities.

Authors:  Radleigh G Santos; Marc A Giulianotti; Richard A Houghten; José L Medina-Franco
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Benchmarking ligand-based virtual High-Throughput Screening with the PubChem database.

Authors:  Mariusz Butkiewicz; Edward W Lowe; Ralf Mueller; Jeffrey L Mendenhall; Pedro L Teixeira; C David Weaver; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Rethinking 3D-QSAR.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 10.  Reviewing ligand-based rational drug design: the search for an ATP synthase inhibitor.

Authors:  Chia-Hsien Lee; Hsuan-Cheng Huang; Hsueh-Fen Juan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.