Literature DB >> 19754041

Kinetic and energetic paradigms for dye-sensitized solar cells: moving from the ideal to the real.

Brian C O'Regan1, James R Durrant.   

Abstract

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are photoelectrochemical solar cells. Their function is based on photoinduced charge separation at a dye-sensitized interface between a nanocrystalline, mesoporous metal oxide electrode and a redox electrolyte. They have been the subject of substantial academic and commercial research over the last 20 years, motivated by their potential as a low-cost solar energy conversion technology. Substantial progress has been made in enhancing the efficiency, stability, and processability of this technology and, in particular, the interplay between these technology drivers. However, despite intense research efforts, our ability to identify predictive materials and structure/device function relationships and, thus, achieve the rational optimization of materials and device design, remains relatively limited. A key challenge in developing such predictive design tools is the chemical complexity of the device. DSSCs comprise distinct materials components, including metal oxide nanoparticles, a molecular sensitizer dye, and a redox electrolyte, all of which exhibit complex interactions with each other. In particular, the electrolyte alone is chemically complex, including not only a redox couple (almost always iodide/iodine) but also a range of additional additives found empirically to enhance device performance. These molecular solutes make up typically 20% of the electrolyte by volume. As with most molecular systems, they exhibit complex interactions with both themselves and the other device components (e.g., the sensitizer dye and the metal oxide). Moreover, these interactions can be modulated by solar irradiation and device operation. As such, understanding the function of these photoelectrochemical solar cells requires careful consideration of the chemical complexity and its impact upon device operation. In this Account, we focus on the process by which electrons injected into the nanocrystalline electrode are collected by the external electrical circuit in real devices under operating conditions. We first of all summarize device function, including the energetics and kinetics of the key processes, using an "idealized" description, which does not fully account for much of the chemical complexity of the system. We then go on to consider recent advances in our understanding of the impact of these complexities upon the efficiency of electron collection. These include "catalysis" of interfacial recombination losses by surface adsorption processes and the influence of device operating conditions upon the recombination rate constant and conduction band energy, both attributed to changes in the chemical composition of the interface. We go on to discuss appropriate methodologies for quantifying the efficiency of electron collection in devices under operation. Finally, we show that, by taking into account these advances in our understanding of the DSSC function, we are able to recreate the current/voltage curves of both efficient and degraded devices without any fitting parameters and, thus, gain significant insight into the determinants of DSSC performance.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19754041     DOI: 10.1021/ar900145z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  14 in total

Review 1.  Brief overview of dye-sensitized solar cells.

Authors:  Anders Hagfeldt
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Direct observation of sequential oxidations of a titania-bound molecular proxy catalyst generated through illumination of molecular sensitizers.

Authors:  Hsiang-Yun Chen; Shane Ardo
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Solar water splitting in a molecular photoelectrochemical cell.

Authors:  Leila Alibabaei; M Kyle Brennaman; Michael R Norris; Berç Kalanyan; Wenjing Song; Mark D Losego; Javier J Concepcion; Robert A Binstead; Gregory N Parsons; Thomas J Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Improving scattering layer through mixture of nanoporous spheres and nanoparticles in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells.

Authors:  Chohui Kim; Hongsik Choi; Jae Ik Kim; Sangheon Lee; Jinhyun Kim; Woojin Lee; Taehyun Hwang; Suji Kang; Taeho Moon; Byungwoo Park
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.703

5.  Spectroscopic detection of halogen bonding resolves dye regeneration in the dye-sensitized solar cell.

Authors:  Fraser G L Parlane; Chantal Mustoe; Cameron W Kellett; Sarah J Simon; Wesley B Swords; Gerald J Meyer; Pierre Kennepohl; Curtis P Berlinguette
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Dye-sensitized electron transfer from TiO2 to oxidized triphenylamines that follows first-order kinetics.

Authors:  Brian N DiMarco; Ludovic Troian-Gautier; Renato N Sampaio; Gerald J Meyer
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  2H-Dinaphthopentacene: A Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Core for Metal-Free Organic Sensitizers in Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells.

Authors:  Yameng Ren; Jiao Liu; Aibin Zheng; Xiandui Dong; Peng Wang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 16.806

8.  Photoexcitation Processes in Oligomethine Cyanine Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells-Synthesis and Computational Study.

Authors:  Corneliu I Oprea; Petre Panait; Zahraa M Essam; Reda M Abd El-Aal; Mihai A Gîrțu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 9.  Recent advancements in compact layer development for perovskite solar cells.

Authors:  Hamideh Mohammadian-Sarcheshmeh; Mohammad Mazloum-Ardakani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-11-12

10.  Angular response of photonic crystal based dye sensitized solar cells.

Authors:  Carmen López-López; Silvia Colodrero; Mauricio E Calvo; Hernán Míguez
Journal:  Energy Environ Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 38.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.