BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been shown to promote neovascularization under physiologic and pathologic conditions. Statins have been documented to increase the total number of circulating EPCs in long-term treated patients. Lipid apheresis is used to treat patient with refractory hyperlipidemia. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether lipid apheresis is associated with EPC mobilization. METHODS: Thirteen patients with refractory hyperlipidemia (analysis at the beginning and at the end of a single lipid apheresis treatment) and 10 healthy controls were included into the study. For quantifying total peripheral EPCs, CD133+/Flk-1+ myelo-monocytic blood cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. The proliferative potential of EPCs was evaluated by a "colony-forming unit" assay. In some patients, EPC eNOS expression was evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: Circulating EPCs and the cells' proliferative activity were lower in hyperlipidemia patients as compared to controls (0.14 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.14, P = 0.01, and 13.9 +/- 4.9 vs. 45.6 +/- 8.1, P = 0.0007). Lipid apheresis treatment was not associated with an increase in total EPCs. The cells' proliferative activity was strongly stimulated by lipid apheresis as reflected by an increase in the number of EPC colonies (13.9 +/- 4.9 to 34.1 +/- 7.3, P = 0.035). Analysis of EPC eNOS expression revealed a threefold increase in the cellular expression intensity after lipid apheresis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with refractory hyperlipidemia exhibit lower peripheral EPC numbers and a lower proliferative activity of circulating EPCs than healthy controls. A single lipid apheresis treatment significantly stimulates EPC proliferation, it furthermore increases cellular eNOS. In summary, these results show that lipid apheresis mediates beneficial effects on the EPC system as an essential element in the process of vascular repair in the human organism.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been shown to promote neovascularization under physiologic and pathologic conditions. Statins have been documented to increase the total number of circulating EPCs in long-term treated patients. Lipid apheresis is used to treat patient with refractory hyperlipidemia. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether lipid apheresis is associated with EPC mobilization. METHODS: Thirteen patients with refractory hyperlipidemia (analysis at the beginning and at the end of a single lipid apheresis treatment) and 10 healthy controls were included into the study. For quantifying total peripheral EPCs, CD133+/Flk-1+ myelo-monocytic blood cells were enumerated by flow cytometry. The proliferative potential of EPCs was evaluated by a "colony-forming unit" assay. In some patients, EPC eNOS expression was evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: Circulating EPCs and the cells' proliferative activity were lower in hyperlipidemiapatients as compared to controls (0.14 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.14, P = 0.01, and 13.9 +/- 4.9 vs. 45.6 +/- 8.1, P = 0.0007). Lipid apheresis treatment was not associated with an increase in total EPCs. The cells' proliferative activity was strongly stimulated by lipid apheresis as reflected by an increase in the number of EPC colonies (13.9 +/- 4.9 to 34.1 +/- 7.3, P = 0.035). Analysis of EPC eNOS expression revealed a threefold increase in the cellular expression intensity after lipid apheresis. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with refractory hyperlipidemia exhibit lower peripheral EPC numbers and a lower proliferative activity of circulating EPCs than healthy controls. A single lipid apheresis treatment significantly stimulates EPC proliferation, it furthermore increases cellular eNOS. In summary, these results show that lipid apheresis mediates beneficial effects on the EPC system as an essential element in the process of vascular repair in the human organism.
Authors: Susann A Patschan; Daniel Patschan; Johanna Temme; Peter Korsten; Johannes T Wessels; Michael Koziolek; Elvira Henze; Gerhard A Müller Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Susann Patschan; Daniel Patschan; Elvira Henze; Sabine Blaschke; Johannes T Wessels; Gerhard Anton Müller Journal: Int J Nephrol Date: 2012-06-26
Authors: S Patschan; D Tampe; C Müller; C Seitz; C Herink; G A Müller; E Zeisberg; M Zeisberg; E Henze; D Patschan Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 2.362