Literature DB >> 19753406

A description of the outcomes, frequency, duration, and intensity of occupational, physical, and speech therapy in inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Joy Karges1, Stacy Smallfied.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes, frequency, duration, intensity, and the specific types of therapeutic intervention of inpatient stroke rehabilitation specific to one hospital in the upper midwestern region of the United States following implementation of the IRF PPS.
DESIGN: This was a non-experimental retrospective chart review of individuals who received inpatient stroke rehabilitation from January 2003 to June 2004.
METHODS: A total of 80 medical records met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were collected on patient and clinical characteristics, FIM scores, LOS, and discharge location as well as the intensity, frequency, and total number of occupational therapy (OT), physical therapy (PT), and speech therapy (ST) treatment sessions, the type of therapy sessions provided, and the type of therapy service providers.
RESULTS: LOS was 15.19 days +/- 11.69. There was a significant difference (t =-12.163; p = .000) between FIM total admission score (71.90 +/- 21.47) and FIM total discharge score (92.23 +/- 24.43) ). There was a significant difference in FIM discharge scores (F = 26.494; p = 000) based on discharge location with differences found between the discharge locations of home and skilled nursing facilities (p = .000) and skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities (p = .019). Mean number of therapy sessions per subject was 21.73 +/- 18.11 for OT, 21.99 +/- 18.10 for PT, and 18.86 +/- 18.71 for ST. Mean number of sessions per day was 1.72 +/- 0.31 sessions for OT, 1.65 +/- 0.36 sessions for PT, and 1.52 +/- 0.48 for ST. Mean number of minutes provided per session was 29.87 +/- 1.77 minutes for OT, 29.70 +/- 1.65 minutes for PT, and 27.23 +/- 6.64 minutes for ST. Mean intensity (days of therapy/length of stay) was 0.82 +/- 0.13 for OT, 0.85 +/- 0.13 for PT and 0.70 +/- 0.24 for ST. Of the total OT sessions, 97.41% were conducted by the OT and 77.68% were intervention only. Of the total PT sessions, 65.66% were conducted by the PT, 15.35% were by the PTA, and 92.67% were for intervention only.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested inpatient stroke rehabilitation has an impact on the rehabilitation process as evidenced by the improved FIM scores at discharge. Individuals who received inpatient rehabilitation for stroke at this facility stayed just over 2 weeks and improved on average by 20 points on the FIM. The patients in this study were seen for skilled OT, PT, and ST for about 30 minutes per session, 1.5 times per day, and received therapy services for 5 to 6 days per week on average. Future prospective research investigating the specific types of therapeutic interventions provided by each rehabilitation discipline is warranted in order to gain a clearer understanding of the effectiveness of inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19753406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allied Health        ISSN: 0090-7421


  8 in total

1.  Physical therapy activities in stroke, knee arthroplasty, and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: their variation, similarities, and association with functional outcomes.

Authors:  Gerben DeJong; Ching-Hui Hsieh; Koen Putman; Randall J Smout; Susan D Horn; Wenqiang Tian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

2.  A case report exploring activity intensity in inpatient rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Kathryn Zalewski; Julie Kerk; Kristina Laundre; Amber Wacek; Melissa Wiedmeyer
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2010-07-14

3.  Occupational, Physical, and Speech Therapy Treatment Activities During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Cynthia L Beaulieu; Marcel P Dijkers; Ryan S Barrett; Susan D Horn; Clare G Giuffrida; Misti L Timpson; Deborah M Carroll; Randy J Smout; Flora M Hammond
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  The Influence of Speech-Language-Hearing Therapy Duration on the Degree of Improvement in Poststroke Language Impairment.

Authors:  Hitoshi Hayashi; Eisaku Okada; Yosuke Shibata; Mieko Nakamura; Toshiyuki Ojima
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-11

5.  Long-term morbidities in stroke survivors: a prospective multicenter study of Thai stroke rehabilitation registry.

Authors:  Vilai Kuptniratsaikul; Apichana Kovindha; Sumalee Suethanapornkul; Nuttaset Manimmanakorn; Yingsumal Archongka
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Why do patients with stroke not receive the recommended amount of active therapy (ReAcT)? Study protocol for a multisite case study investigation.

Authors:  David J Clarke; Sarah Tyson; Helen Rodgers; Avril Drummond; Rebecca Palmer; Matthew Prescott; Pippa Tyrrell; Louisa Burton; Katie Grenfell; Lianne Brkic; Anne Forster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Are weekend inpatient rehabilitation services value for money? An economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial with a 30 day follow up.

Authors:  Natasha Kareem Brusco; Jennifer J Watts; Nora Shields; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Prospective Observational Pilot Cohort Study.

Authors:  See-Hwee Yeo; Keng He Kong; Derek Chi-Kien Lim; Wai-Ping Yau
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2019-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.