| Literature DB >> 19753225 |
Antonio Rios-Luna1, Homid Fahandezh-Saddi, Manuel Villanueva-Martínez, Antonio García López.
Abstract
Coverage of soft-tissue defects in the lower limbs, especially open tibial fractures, is currently a frequently done procedure because of the high incidence of high-energy trauma, which affects this location. The skilled orthopedic surgeon should be able to carry out an integral treatment of these lesions, which include not only the open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture fragments but also the management of complications such as local wound problems that may arise. There is a wide variety of muscular or pedicled flaps available for reconstruction of lower limb soft-tissue defects. These techniques are not commonly used by orthopedic surgeons because of the lack of familiarity with them and the potential for flap failure and problems derived from morbidity of the donor site. We present a coverage management update for orthopedic surgeons for complications after an open tibial fracture. We choose and describe the most adequate flap depending on the region injured and the reliable surgical procedure. For proximal third of the tibia, we use gastrocnemius muscle flap. Middle third of the tibia could be covered by soleus muscle flap. Distal third of the tibia could be reconstructed by sural flaps, lateral supramalleolar skin flap, and posterior tibial perforator flap. Free flaps can be used in all regions. We describe the advantages and disadvantages, pearls, and tips of every flap. The coverage of the tibia after a major injury constitutes a reliable and versatile technique that should form part of the therapeutic arsenal of all the orthopedic surgeons, facilitating the integral treatment of complex lower limb injuries with exposed defects.Entities:
Keywords: Open tibial fracture; soft tissue coverage; soft-tissue damage
Year: 2008 PMID: 19753225 PMCID: PMC2740344 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.43376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Figure 1Preoperative photograph showing dissected lateral head of gastrocnemius flap
Figure 2(a) Clinical photograph showing external fixator and soft tissue defect in open distal third tibial fracture. (b) Clinical photograph showing Sural flap marked out. We measured the defect to cover and based on its dimensions we draw the skin islet to be transferred in the form of a paddle centered over the depicted neurovascular sural bundle. (c) Preoperative photograph showing dissected sural flap. Dissection of the graft has to reach the distal limit which we marked, 4-5 cm proximal to the peroneal malleolus. (d) Clinical photograph showing skin defect, final closure.
Figure 3Preoperative photograph showing dissected lateral supramalleolar skin flap
Figure 4(a) Clinical photograph showing middle third open tibial fracture with big soft tissue defect. (b) Preoperative photograph showing latissimus dorsi muscle free flap, proximally based at the donor site. (c) Clinical photograph showing final coverage of defect.