Literature DB >> 19752705

Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.

Scott J Luhmann1, Lawrence G Lenke, Keith H Bridwell, Mario Schootman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to review the overall prevalence of, and indications for, reoperations after the index spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis at our center. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine fusions for idiopathic scoliosis are expected to be the final therapeutic intervention in management. In a recent publication in 2006, reoperations after index spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis were reported in 12.9% of patients at a single institution (n = 1046).
METHODS: A spinal deformity database search at our center identified all primary anterior, posterior, and circumferential spinal fusions performed for idiopathic scoliosis (1985-2003). A total of 1057 patients were identified whose mean age was 14.4 years (7-22 years) with minimum 2 year follow-up after index surgery. Study cohort consisted patients who underwent reoperation for any reason after index fusion procedure.
RESULTS: Of the 1057 spinal fusions for idiopathic scoliosis, 41 (3.9%) underwent reoperation. Primary surgeries were: 11 anterior spinal fusions, 25 posterior spinal fusions, and 5 circumferential spinal fusions. Mean follow-up was 5.7 years (2-10.8). Forty-seven additional procedures were performed during 46 reoperations at an average of 26 months after index procedure (1 week-73 months). Of the 47 reoperations, 20 (43%) were revision spinal fusions (for pseudarthroses, uninstrumented curve progression or junctional kyphosis), 16 (34%) because of infections (5 acute, 11 chronic), 7 (15%) for implant removals due to pain and/or prominence (4 complete, 3 partial), 2 (4%) were revision of loosened implants, and 2 (4%) were elective thoracoplasties.
CONCLUSION: This study documented a 3.9% overall reoperation rate at our medical center, a 3-fold lower reoperation rate than the previously reported 12.9%. The most common reoperations were for infections (34%), pseudarthroses (26%), and postoperative curve progression of the adjacent unfused spine (17%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19752705     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3515a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Alice Darnis; Pierre Grobost; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-08

Review 2.  Idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Per Trobisch; Olaf Suess; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years.

Authors:  Guillaume Riouallon; Benjamin Bouyer; Stéphane Wolff
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Bovine-derived xenograft is a viable bone graft substitute in multilevel, instrumented, spinal fusion.

Authors:  Max Prost; Jochaim Windolf; Markus Rafael Konieczny
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Impact of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Spinal Fusion in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Terence Verla; Owoicho Adogwa; Ulysses Toche; S Harrison Farber; Frank Petraglia; Kelly R Murphy; Steven Thomas; Parastou Fatemi; Oren Gottfried; Carlos A Bagley; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Massive hemothorax caused by Gelpi retractor during posterior correction surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report.

Authors:  Long Pang; Kota Watanabe; Yoshiaki Toyama; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-10-25

Review 7.  Long fusion correction of degenerative adult spinal deformity and the selection of the upper or lower thoracic region as the site of proximal instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Fu; Xiao-Lei Sun; Jonathan A Harris; Sun-Ren Sheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi; Ai-Min Wu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Comparison of the Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach versus Posterior-Only Approach in Scoliosis Treatment.

Authors:  Hossein Hojjat Pourfeizi; Jafar Ganjpour Sales; Ali Tabrizi; Ghanbar Borran; Sahar Alavi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06

Review 9.  Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Complications.

Authors:  Omar A Al-Mohrej; Sahar S Aldakhil; Mohammed A Al-Rabiah; Anwar M Al-Rabiah
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.