Literature DB >> 19752619

Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance?

Stefanos Albanis1, Hammad M Ather, Athanasios G Papatsoris, Junaid Masood, Dimitrios Staios, Taufiq Sheikh, Sobia Akhtar, Noor Buchholz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to assess the efficacy and safety of combined forced hydration and diuresis with limited inversion during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing this treatment modality with conventional SWL for lower calyceal nephrolithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, non-randomized study, we included 100 patients with lower calyceal calculi <or=2 cm. Fifty of them received conventional SWL and the other 50 underwent SWL combined with oral hydration, diuresis and 12 degrees inversion position during SWL. Intravenous urography was performed for all patients prior to their treatment. Patients in both groups were treated on Dornier MPL 9000. Blood pressure monitoring was applied during the SWL session. Follow-up was performed the first and the third month after treatment with plain kidney-ureter-bladder X-ray and kidney-ureter-bladder ultrasound.
RESULTS: Clinical outcomes were available in 90 patients. Follow-up at 3 months showed that 83.3% of the patients belonging to the study group were rendered stone free, whereas 71.5% were stone free in the control (p > 0.05). Complications were minimal and not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Forced diuresis and inversion therapy is very well tolerated; however, the stone-free rate was not significantly improved. Copyright (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19752619     DOI: 10.1159/000230026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].

Authors:  A Häcker; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 3.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs.

Authors:  Suoshi Jing; Qiongyan Gai; Xin Zhao; Juan Wang; Yuwen Gong; Yangyang Pang; Chen Peng; Yuejun Tian; Yuhan Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score for retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Jung; Byung Ki Lee; Yong Hyun Park; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sang Eun Lee; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for < 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL).

Authors:  Wenqi Wu; Zhou Yang; Fengling Tang; Changbao Xu; Youzhi Wang; Xiaojian Gu; Xuehua Chen; Rongjiang Wang; Jiaka Yan; Xiang Wang; Wenxi Gao; Chunhua Hou; Jianming Guo; Jian Zhang; Alberto Gurioli; Zhangqun Ye; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Effect of mechanical percussion combined with patient position change on the elimination of upper urinary stones/fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zeng; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Jian Huang; Tuo Deng; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Saeed R Khan; Margaret S Pearle; William G Robertson; Giovanni Gambaro; Benjamin K Canales; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Management of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments following Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Elisa Cicerello; Franco Merlo; Luigi Maccatrozzo
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.