Literature DB >> 19752576

The randomized controlled trial.

Vianda S Stel1, Carmine Zoccali, Friedo W Dekker, Kitty J Jager.   

Abstract

Until recently, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have rarely been performed in nephrology, because of several difficulties in conducting an RCT. The purpose of this article is to describe several issues related to the design and to the quality of RCTs in their conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the results. The advantage of an RCT is that, as a result of randomization, selection by prognosis by the clinician is prevented. However, not all RCTs provide a definitive answer on the research question that the investigators try to answer because of potential problems in their design, conduct and analysis. For example, the results of an RCT could be biased if the physicians and patients in the experimental and control groups were not sufficiently 'blinded'. Nevertheless, if conducted properly, RCTs remain the gold standard for studying the effects of therapy and other interventions. (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19752576     DOI: 10.1159/000237143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract        ISSN: 1660-2110


  5 in total

1.  Exploring robust methods for evaluating treatment and comparison groups in chronic care management programs.

Authors:  Aaron R Wells; Brent Hamar; Chastity Bradley; William M Gandy; Patricia L Harrison; James A Sidney; Carter R Coberley; Elizabeth Y Rula; James E Pope
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 2.  Where to look for the most frequent biases?

Authors:  Kitty J Jager; Giovanni Tripepi; Nicholas C Chesnaye; Friedo W Dekker; Carmine Zoccali; Vianda S Stel
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Effect of high-protein meals during hemodialysis combined with lanthanum carbonate in hypoalbuminemic dialysis patients: findings from the FrEDI randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Connie M Rhee; Amy S You; Tara Koontz Parsons; Amanda R Tortorici; Rachelle Bross; David E St-Jules; Jennie Jing; Martin L Lee; Debbie Benner; Csaba P Kovesdy; Rajnish Mehrotra; Joel D Kopple; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Representativeness of European clinical trial populations in mild Alzheimer's disease dementia: a comparison of 18-month outcomes with real-world data from the GERAS observational study.

Authors:  Catherine Reed; Mark Belger; Grazia Dell'Agnello; Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski; Gopalan Sethuraman; Ann Hake; Joel Raskin; David Henley
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 6.982

Review 5.  A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Adel El Feky; Katie Gillies; Heidi Gardner; Cynthia Fraser; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.