OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) can be challenging. In the absence of a gold standard to verify the reliability of the diagnosis by EEG-video, we sought to assess the interrater reliability of the diagnosis using EEG-video recordings. METHODS: Patient samples consisted of 22 unselected consecutive patients who underwent EEG-video monitoring and had at least an episode recorded. Other test results and histories were not provided because the goal was to assess the reliability of the EEG-video. Data were sent to 22 reviewers, who were board-certified neurologists and practicing epileptologists at epilepsy centers. Choices were 1) PNES, 2) epilepsy, and 3) nonepileptic but not psychogenic ("physiologic") events. Interrater agreement was measured using a kappa coefficient for each diagnostic category. We used generalized kappa coefficients, which measure the overall level of between-method agreement beyond that which can be ascribed to chance. We also report category-specific kappa values. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of PNES, there was moderate agreement (kappa = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.76). For the diagnosis of epilepsy, there was substantial agreement (kappa = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.86). For physiologic nonepileptic episodes, the agreement was low (kappa = 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.27). The overall kappa statistic across all 3 diagnostic categories was moderate at 0.56 (95% CI 0.41-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Interrater reliability for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures by EEG-video monitoring was only moderate. Although this may be related to limitations of the study (diagnosis based on EEG-video alone, artificial nature of the forced choice paradigm, single episode), it highlights the difficulties and subjective components inherent to this diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) can be challenging. In the absence of a gold standard to verify the reliability of the diagnosis by EEG-video, we sought to assess the interrater reliability of the diagnosis using EEG-video recordings. METHODS:Patient samples consisted of 22 unselected consecutive patients who underwent EEG-video monitoring and had at least an episode recorded. Other test results and histories were not provided because the goal was to assess the reliability of the EEG-video. Data were sent to 22 reviewers, who were board-certified neurologists and practicing epileptologists at epilepsy centers. Choices were 1) PNES, 2) epilepsy, and 3) nonepileptic but not psychogenic ("physiologic") events. Interrater agreement was measured using a kappa coefficient for each diagnostic category. We used generalized kappa coefficients, which measure the overall level of between-method agreement beyond that which can be ascribed to chance. We also report category-specific kappa values. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of PNES, there was moderate agreement (kappa = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.76). For the diagnosis of epilepsy, there was substantial agreement (kappa = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.86). For physiologic nonepileptic episodes, the agreement was low (kappa = 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.27). The overall kappa statistic across all 3 diagnostic categories was moderate at 0.56 (95% CI 0.41-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Interrater reliability for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures by EEG-video monitoring was only moderate. Although this may be related to limitations of the study (diagnosis based on EEG-video alone, artificial nature of the forced choice paradigm, single episode), it highlights the difficulties and subjective components inherent to this diagnosis.
Authors: Sheryl R Haut; Anne T Berg; Shlomo Shinnar; Hillel W Cohen; Carl W Bazil; Michael R Sperling; John T Langfitt; Steven V Pacia; Thaddeus S Walczak; Susan S Spencer Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: W Curt LaFrance; Kenneth Alper; Debra Babcock; John J Barry; Selim Benbadis; Rochelle Caplan; John Gates; Margaret Jacobs; Andres Kanner; Roy Martin; Lynn Rundhaugen; Randy Stewart; Christina Vert Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Heidi Danker-Hopfe; D Kunz; G Gruber; G Klösch; J L Lorenzo; S L Himanen; B Kemp; T Penzel; J Röschke; H Dorn; A Schlögl; E Trenker; G Dorffner Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Emily L Thorn; Lauren M Ostrowski; Dhinakaran M Chinappen; Jin Jing; M Brandon Westover; Steven M Stufflebeam; Mark A Kramer; Catherine J Chu Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Kurt Fritzsche; Kathrin Baumann; Katrin Götz-Trabert; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Arthur C Grant; Samah G Abdel-Baki; Jeremy Weedon; Vanessa Arnedo; Geetha Chari; Ewa Koziorynska; Catherine Lushbough; Douglas Maus; Tresa McSween; Katherine A Mortati; Alexandra Reznikov; Ahmet Omurtag Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 2.937