Literature DB >> 19752018

Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.

Tiziano Baccetti1, Lorenzo Franchi, Manuela Mucedero, Paola Cozza.   

Abstract

The purpose of this cephalometric study was to analyse the treatment and post-treatment craniofacial effects of a facemask (FM) combined with a bite block (BB) with specific regard to the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in subjects with a Class III malocclusion when compared with an untreated Class III control group. The FM/BB group (22 subjects, 12 females and 10 males) had a mean age pre-treatment (T1) of 8.9 +/- 1.5 years, at the end of active treatment (T2) of 10.5 +/- 1.3 years, and post-treatment (T3) of 12.6 +/- 1.9 years. The treated group was compared with a control group of 14 subjects (6 females and 8 males) with untreated Class III malocclusions that matched the FM/BB group as to age at T1, T2, and T3, observation periods and skeletal maturation. Comparisons of the T2-T1 and T3-T1 changes between the two groups were analysed with the Mann-Whitney test. Significant favourable skeletal changes in the maxilla and mandible were observed in the treated group both after Ts2 and T3. No significant short- or long-term changes in the sagittal oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airway dimensions were induced by maxillary protraction in subjects with a Class III malocclusion when compared with untreated controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19752018     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Effects of maxillary expansion and protraction on pharyngeal airway dimensions in relation to changes in head posture and hyoid position : A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gökhan Çoban; Taner Öztürk; Merve Ece Erdem; Hatice Cansu Kış; Ahmet Yağcı
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Does the Alternate Rapid Maxillary ExpansionConstriction/Reverse Headgear Therapy Enhance Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions?

Authors:  Nivethitha Bhaskar; Shobha Sundareswaran; Latheef Vadakkeypeediakkal; Praveen Santhakumar; Sreehari Sathyanathan
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-03

3.  Effects of chincup or facemask therapies on the orofacial airway and hyoid position in Class III subjects.

Authors:  Mehmet Akin; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Chousein Chousein; Zafer Sari
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Three-dimensional alterations in pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus volumes in Class III maxillary deficiency subjects undergoing orthopedic facemask treatment.

Authors:  Paschalis Pamporakis; Şirin Nevzatoğlu; Nazan Küçükkeleş
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Upper airway changes in Class III patients using miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction with hybrid and hyrax expanders: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Felicia Miranda; Daniela Garib; Fernando Pugliese; José Carlos da Cunha Bastos; Guilherme Janson; Juan Martin Palomo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Comparison of the effects on the pharyngeal airway space of maxillary protraction appliances according to the methods of anchorage.

Authors:  Won-Gyo Seo; Se-Jin Han
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-01-25

7.  Assessment of the effect of maxillary protraction appliance on pharyngeal airway dimensions in relation to changes in tongue posture.

Authors:  Shahla Momeni Danaei; Shabnam Ajami; Hamideh Etemadi; Niloofar Azadeh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 May-Jun

8.  Three-dimensional oropharyngeal airway changes after facemask therapy using low-dose computed tomography: a clinical trial with a retrospectively collected control group.

Authors:  Amr H Husson; Ahmad S Burhan; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Fehmieh R Nawaya
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 9.  Bone- and dentoalveolar-anchored dentofacial orthopedics for Class III malocclusion: new approaches, similar objectives? : a systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Morales-Fernández; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Rosa Maria Yañez-Vico; Asuncion Mendoza-Mendoza; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction.

Authors:  Zeinab Azamian; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.