Literature DB >> 19751019

Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.

Michael J Dunbar1.   

Abstract

European nations, especially Scandinavian countries, have used cemented fixation since the introduction of total hip arthroplasty. In Sweden, with arguably the best national-level data on prostheses survivorship, >90% of all stems are fixated with cement. In sharp contrast, it is estimated that in the United States, >88% of all femoral stems use cementless technology. This represents a diametrically opposed difference in philosophical approach: the so-called North Atlantic Divide. The departure in North America from cemented femoral stems can be traced to the coinage of the phrase "cement disease," which implicated cement as a leading cause of osteolysis. This led to prolific innovation of uncemented technologies in North America, while European countries favored standardization enabled by the national arthroplasty registries. The term "cement disease" has been proven to be a misnomer, as supported by excellent outcomes from the Scandinavian registries, as well as excellent long-term outcomes for cemented stems in United States series, even in patients younger than 50 years. Like uncemented stems, there is variability in survivorship between femoral stems, and this appears to be related to specific design features. Despite the excellent long-term results, the use of cemented femoral components in Europe and Canada is decreasing in favor of uncemented stems. The reasons for this are not immediately obvious.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19751019     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  9 in total

1.  Multinational comprehensive evaluation of the fixation method used in hip replacement: interaction with age in context.

Authors:  Susanna Stea; Thomas Comfort; Art Sedrakyan; Leif Havelin; Marcella Marinelli; Thomas Barber; Elizabeth Paxton; Samprit Banerjee; Abby J Isaacs; Stephen Graves
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  CORR Insights®: Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.

Authors:  Nikolaos V Bardakos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Interface micromotion of uncemented femoral components from postmortem retrieved total hip replacements.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Peter A Costa; Amos Race; Timothy H Izant
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Clinical Faceoff: Where Are We Going With Femoral Stem Fixation in THA?

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps; C Anderson Engh; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Early perioperative complication rates and subsidence with the Tribute® short cementless, tapered stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John Attenello; Sean Chan; Kelvin Naito; Michele Saruwatari; Sean Saito; Samantha Andrews; Cass Nakasone
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-01-17

6.  MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Stylianos Tottas; Athanasios Ververidis; Ioannis Kougioumtzis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Christina Tsigalou; Makrina Karaglani; Georgios Drosos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-02

7.  Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: The state of the art.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-09

8.  Incidence of a stem sitting proud of a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Kim; Soong Joon Lee; Kekatpure Aditya; Ho Yeon Kim; Kang Sup Yoon; Pil Whan Yoon
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Are powder-technology-built stems safe? A midterm follow-up registry study.

Authors:  Francesco Pardo; Barbara Bordini; Francesco Castagnini; Federico Giardina; Cesare Faldini; Francesco Traina
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.896

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.