Literature DB >> 19751009

The role of impaction grafting: the when and how.

Fares S Haddad1, Faizal Rayan.   

Abstract

The challenges of acetabular revision include bone loss and poor bone biology. Favorable 10-year reports exist of uncemented acetabular revision using hemispherical uncemented sockets. In the presence of bone stock deficiency, adjunctive morsellized impaction bone grafting is a recognized means of restoring bone stock. We attempt to restore bone stock with impaction grafting beneath a cementless cup for contained defects, defects that can be rendered contained, and whenever there is capacity for rim fixation. The technique of bone graft preparation is important. We use a mixture of bone milling and bone chips of various sizes. Morsellized allograft is inserted, packed, and/or reverse reamed into any defects. The reconstruction relies on the ability to gain biological fixation of the component to the underlying host bone. This requires intimate host bone contact and rigid implant stability. The fixation is therefore augmented with screws in all cases. It is important to achieve host bone contact in a least part of the dome and posterior column. When this is possible, and particularly when there is a good rim fit, we have not found it absolutely necessary to have contact with host bone over >50% of the surface. Stability of primary fixation is a better predictor of outcome than volume of graft or percentage of host bone contact. The advantages of bone grafting in acetabular reconstruction include the ability to restore bone stock, rebuild a normal hip center and hip biomechanics, and increase bone stock for future revisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19751009     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  7 in total

1.  [Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring].

Authors:  M J Friedrich; S Gravius; J Schmolders; M D Wimmer; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Acetabular Bone Defects: Are Biological Grafts Really Better than Synthetic Bone Graft Substitutes?

Authors:  Luca Costanzo Comba; Enrico Bellato; Danilo Colombero; Lorenzo Mattei; Antongiulio Marmotti; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-07

4.  Results of the cementless Plasmacup in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 72 cases with an average follow-up of eight years.

Authors:  Stefan Lakemeier; Guenter Aurand; Nina Timmesfeld; Thomas J Heyse; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections.

Authors:  Sunil Gurpur Kini; Ayman Gabr; Rishi Das; Mohamed Sukeik; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-11-30

6.  Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.

Authors:  Masaaki Maruyama; Shinji Wakabayashi; Hiroshi Ota; Keiji Tensho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Bone impaction grafting with trabecular metal augments in large defects in young patients: unravelling a new perspective in surgical technique.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre-Escuredo; Eva Gómez-García; Salvador Álvarez-Villar; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.