Literature DB >> 19748957

Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution.

Jacob Møller1, Alessio Boldrin, Thomas H Christensen.   

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) of source-separated municipal solid waste (MSW) and use of the digestate is presented from a global warming (GW) point of view by providing ranges of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are useful for calculation of global warming factors (GWFs), i.e. the contribution to GW measured in CO(2)-equivalents per tonne of wet waste. The GHG accounting was done by distinguishing between direct contributions at the AD facility and indirect upstream or downstream contributions. GHG accounting for a generic AD facility with either biogas utilization at the facility or upgrading of the gas for vehicle fuel resulted in a GWF from -375 (a saving) to 111 (a load) kg CO(2)-eq. tonne(-1) wet waste. In both cases the digestate was used for fertilizer substitution. This large range was a result of the variation found for a number of key parameters: energy substitution by biogas, N(2)O-emission from digestate in soil, fugitive emission of CH( 4), unburned CH(4), carbon bound in soil and fertilizer substitution. GWF for a specific type of AD facility was in the range -95 to -4 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne(-1) wet waste. The ranges of uncertainty, especially of fugitive losses of CH(4) and carbon sequestration highly influenced the result. In comparison with the few published GWFs for AD, the range of our data was much larger demonstrating the need to use a consistent and robust approach to GHG accounting and simultaneously accept that some key parameters are highly uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19748957     DOI: 10.1177/0734242X09344876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag Res


  6 in total

1.  A multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework: development and application in comparing two food waste management options using a UK region as a case study.

Authors:  Eleni Iacovidou; Nikolaos Voulvoulis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Life cycle and economic assessment of source-separated MSW collection with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: a case study in China.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Mingjiang Ni; Yong Chi; Daoan Zou; Chao Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Screening of 18 species for digestate phytodepuration.

Authors:  Francesca Pavan; Simone Breschigliaro; Maurizio Borin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  The effect of anaerobic digestion and storage on indicator microorganisms in swine and dairy manure.

Authors:  Annamaria Costa; Claudia Gusmara; Davide Gardoni; Mauro Zaninelli; Fulvia Tambone; Vittorio Sala; Marcella Guarino
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Reviewing the anaerobic digestion and co-digestion process of food waste from the perspectives on biogas production performance and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Sam L H Chiu; Irene M C Lo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Legacy effects override soil properties for CO2 and N2O but not CH4 emissions following digestate application to soil.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Rosace; Fabio Veronesi; Stephen Briggs; Laura M Cardenas; Simon Jeffery
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.745

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.