Literature DB >> 19748950

Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.

Alessio Boldrin1, Jacob K Andersen, Jacob Møller, Thomas H Christensen, Enzo Favoino.   

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to composting of organic waste and the use of compost were assessed from a waste management perspective. The GHG accounting for composting includes use of electricity and fuels, emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from the composting process, and savings obtained by the use of the compost. The GHG account depends on waste type and composition (kitchen organics, garden waste), technology type (open systems, closed systems, home composting), the efficiency of off-gas cleaning at enclosed composting systems, and the use of the compost. The latter is an important issue and is related to the long-term binding of carbon in the soil, to related effects in terms of soil improvement and to what the compost substitutes; this could be fertilizer and peat for soil improvement or for growth media production. The overall global warming factor (GWF) for composting therefore varies between significant savings (-900 kg CO(2)-equivalents tonne(-1) wet waste (ww)) and a net load (300 kg CO(2)-equivalents tonne( -1) ww). The major savings are obtained by use of compost as a substitute for peat in the production of growth media. However, it may be difficult for a specific composting plant to document how the compost is used and what it actually substitutes for. Two cases representing various technologies were assessed showing how GHG accounting can be done when specific information and data are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19748950     DOI: 10.1177/0734242X09345275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag Res


  8 in total

1.  Life cycle and economic assessment of source-separated MSW collection with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: a case study in China.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Mingjiang Ni; Yong Chi; Daoan Zou; Chao Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Aerobic Biostabilization of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste-Monitoring Hot and Cold Spots in the Reactor as a Novel Tool for Process Optimization.

Authors:  Sylwia Stegenta-Dąbrowska; Peter F Randerson; Andrzej Białowiec
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 3.  Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review.

Authors:  Guillermo Pardo; Raúl Moral; Eduardo Aguilera; Agustín Del Prado
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities.

Authors:  Ben Morelli; Sarah Cashman; Xin Cissy Ma; Jason Turgeon; Sam Arden; Jay Garland
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.915

5.  Creating careful circularities: Community composting in New York City.

Authors:  Oona Morrow; Anna Davies
Journal:  Trans Inst Br Geogr       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  Cities' Role in Mitigating United States Food System Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Authors:  Eugene A Mohareb; Martin C Heller; Peter M Guthrie
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Life cycle inventories of waste management processes.

Authors:  Melanie Haupt; Thomas Kägi; Stefanie Hellweg
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-05-19

8.  Material Flows and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Potential of Decentralized Composting in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Dotanhan Yeo; Kouassi Dongo; Adeline Mertenat; Phillipp Lüssenhop; Ina Körner; Christian Zurbrügg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.