| Literature DB >> 19748923 |
Richard M Halpern1, Tanya Rouleau.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the method of preparation of enamel which best retains a bonded orthodontic bracket against a shear force. Two hundred and twelve human lower premolars were randomly divided into four equal groups. Group 1 underwent no air abrasion, group 2 received treatment with 25 microm aluminium oxide particles, group 3 with 50 microm particles, and group 4 with 100 microm particles. All groups were treated with a self-etching primer before bonding of an orthodontic bracket. Each tooth was tested in a JJ Lloyd M30K machine to determine the maximum shear force required to dislodge the bracket from the tooth. A one-way analysis of variance test conducted at a 95 percent confidence level (CL) demonstrated that there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) with respect to the four methods of preparation of the enamel surface. An unpaired t-test was then applied at a 95 percent CL. There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2. There was, however, a statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.01), as well as between groups 1 and 4 (P < 0.01). In addition, there was significant difference found between groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05), groups 2 and 4 (P < 0.01), and groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19748923 DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Orthod ISSN: 0141-5387 Impact factor: 3.075