Literature DB >> 19748617

Evaluating the effect of the new incentive system for high-risk pressure ulcer patients on wound healing and cost-effectiveness: a cohort study.

Hiromi Sanada1, Gojiro Nakagami, Yuko Mizokami, Yukiko Minami, Aya Yamamoto, Makoto Oe, Toshiko Kaitani, Shinji Iizaka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new incentive system for pressure ulcer management, which focused on skilled nurse staffing in terms of rate of healing and medical costs. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study included two types of groups: 39 institutions, which introduced the new incentive system, and 20 non-introduced groups (control). Sixty-seven patients suffering from severe pressure ulcers in the introduced group and 38 patients in the non-introduced group were included. Wound healing and medical costs were monitored weekly for three weeks by their skilled nurses in charge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healing status and related medical costs.
RESULTS: The introduced group showed significantly higher rate of healing compared with the control group at each weekly assessment. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the introduction of the new incentive system was independently associated with the faster healing rate (beta=3.44, P<.001). The budget impact analysis demonstrated that introducing this system could reduce cost of treating severe pressure ulcers by 1.776 billion yen per year.
CONCLUSIONS: The new incentive system for the management of pressure ulcers, which focused on staffing with skilled nurses can improve healing rate with reduced medical cost. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19748617     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  9 in total

Review 1.  Improved wound management at lower cost: a sensible goal for Australia.

Authors:  Rosana E Norman; Michelle Gibb; Anthony Dyer; Jennifer Prentice; Stephen Yelland; Qinglu Cheng; Peter A Lazzarini; Keryln Carville; Karen Innes-Walker; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards; Edward Burn; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Dressings as an adjunct to pressure ulcer prevention: consensus panel recommendations.

Authors:  Joyce Black; Michael Clark; Carol Dealey; Christopher T Brindle; Paulo Alves; Nick Santamaria; Evan Call
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Traditional Japanese formula kigikenchuto accelerates healing of pressure-loading skin ulcer in rats.

Authors:  Mari Kimura; Naotoshi Shibahara; Hiroaki Hikiami; Toshiko Yoshida; Michiko Jo; Maria Kaneko; Tatsuya Nogami; Makoto Fujimoto; Hirozo Goto; Yutaka Shimada
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 4.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of complex wound interventions reveals optimal treatments for specific wound types.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Elise Cogo; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Paul A Khan; Geetha Sanmugalingham; Jesmin Antony; Jeffrey S Hoch; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 5.  Economic evaluations of guideline-based or strategic interventions for the prevention or treatment of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Marissa J Carter
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  Prevalence of pressure injuries in Japanese older people: A population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shuji Nakashima; Hirotomo Yamanashi; Satomi Komiya; Katsumi Tanaka; Takahiro Maeda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Acceleration of Skin Wound-Healing Reactions by Autologous Micrograft Tissue Suspension.

Authors:  Shiro Jimi; Satoshi Takagi; Francesco De Francesco; Motoyasu Miyazaki; Arman Saparov
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Brian Williams; Suzanne Hagen; Janet Logan; Cathryn Glazener; Stewart Pringle; Lesley Sinclair
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Differences in the working pattern among wound, ostomy, and continence nurses with and without conducting the specified medical act: a multicenter time and motion study.

Authors:  Yukie Sakai; Tomoe Yokono; Yuko Mizokami; Hiromi Sanada; Mayumi Okuwa; Toshio Nakatani; Junko Sugama
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-11-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.