Literature DB >> 19747535

An in vitro micronucleus assay with size-classified micronucleus counting to discriminate aneugens from clastogens.

Kiyohiro Hashimoto1, Yumi Nakajima, Shigeo Matsumura, Fumio Chatani.   

Abstract

In the in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay, genotoxic chemicals can be characterized as aneugens and clastogens by the presence and absence of kinetochore protein or centromere regions in the micronuclei, respectively. Aneugens preferentially induce kinetochore- or centromere-positive micronuclei which can be detected by the immunofluorescence staining method or the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method. Both methods are robust and reliable; however, these assays require a definite period of time and cost to obtain a result that suggests that the genotoxic chemicals cause aneuploidy. This is why these methods are not adequate to evaluate dozens of chemicals which are mixtures of aneugens and clastogens. To evaluate a batch of chemicals, a quicker and more convenient assay is desirable. In the present study, we examined whether the size-classified counting of MN is as effective as the FISH method to characterize aneuploidy in the in vitro MN assay using Chinese hamster lung (CHL) cell lines. As aneugens, 9 substances (colcemid, vincristine sulfate, paclitaxel, thiabendazole, diethylstilbestrol, griseofulvin, bisphenol A, fisetin and okadaic acid) were used; as clastogens 6 substances (methylmethane sulfonate, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitroso-guanidine, etoposide, mitomycin C, hydroxyurea and actinomycin D) were used. The size-classified counting revealed that all the 9 aneugens increased both the frequency and proportion of large-size MN as compared with the vehicle control. Although N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitroso-guanidine, etoposide and mitomycin C increased the frequency, no increase was observed in the proportion. Meanwhile, with the FISH method, all the aneugens induced centromere-positive micronuclei but the clastogens did not. Based on these results, it is considered that the frequency of large-size MN in the in vitro MN assay is an alerting index for aneugenic effects and that its proportion is a simple and reliable index which is as effective as the FISH analysis for discrimination of aneugens from clastogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19747535     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of genotoxicity associated with hydroxyurea therapy in children with sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Flanagan; Thad A Howard; Nicole Mortier; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Matthew P Smeltzer; Song Wu; Stephen D Dertinger; Russell E Ware
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Characterization of environmental chemicals with potential for DNA damage using isogenic DNA repair-deficient chicken DT40 cell lines.

Authors:  Kimiyo N Yamamoto; Kouji Hirota; Koichi Kono; Shunichi Takeda; Srilatha Sakamuru; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Christopher P Austin; Kristine L Witt; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Beta Human Papillomavirus 8 E6 Induces Micronucleus Formation and Promotes Chromothripsis.

Authors:  Dalton Dacus; Steven Stancic; Sarah R Pollina; Elizabeth Rifrogiate; Rachel Palinski; Nicholas A Wallace
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.549

4.  A comparative study of the aneugenic and polyploidy-inducing effects of fisetin and two model Aurora kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  P Gollapudi; L S Hasegawa; D A Eastmond
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.873

5.  Seven benzimidazole pesticides combined at sub-threshold levels induce micronuclei in vitro.

Authors:  Sibylle Ermler; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Genotoxic and Antigenotoxic Assessment of Chios Mastic Oil by the In Vitro Micronucleus Test on Human Lymphocytes and the In Vivo Wing Somatic Test on Drosophila.

Authors:  Dimitris Vlastos; Elena Drosopoulou; Ioanna Efthimiou; Maximos Gavriilidis; Dimitra Panagaki; Krystalenia Mpatziou; Paraskevi Kalamara; Despoina Mademtzoglou; Penelope Mavragani-Tsipidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Active DNA end processing in micronuclei of ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Zizhi Tang; Juan Yang; Xin Wang; Ming Zeng; Jing Wang; Ao Wang; Mingcai Zhao; Liandi Guo; Cong Liu; Dehua Li; Jie Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  A new assay for measuring chromosome instability (CIN) and identification of drugs that elevate CIN in cancer cells.

Authors:  Hee-Sheung Lee; Nicholas C O Lee; Brenda R Grimes; Alexander Samoshkin; Artem V Kononenko; Ruchi Bansal; Hiroshi Masumoto; William C Earnshaw; Natalay Kouprina; Vladimir Larionov
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Flow cytometric analysis identifies changes in S and M phases as novel cell cycle alterations induced by the splicing inhibitor isoginkgetin.

Authors:  Erin J Vanzyl; Kayleigh R C Rick; Alex B Blackmore; Erin M MacFarlane; Bruce C McKay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of the automated MicroFlow® and Metafer™ platforms for high-throughput micronucleus scoring and dose response analysis in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Jatin R Verma; Benjamin J Rees; Eleanor C Wilde; Catherine A Thornton; Gareth J S Jenkins; Shareen H Doak; George E Johnson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 6.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.