Sertac Yetiser1, Yusuf Hidir. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the long-term functional results of tympanic membrane reconstruction with temporalis fascia and cartilage shield grafting. METHODS: This study includes 113 patients who had tympanoplasty type I tympanic membrane reconstruction between 1997 and 2007, 47 with tragal cartilage and 66 with temporalis fascia. Fourteen patients in the cartilage group and 9 patients in the temporalis fascia group also had mastoidectomy. The average follow-up was 3.2 years. The hearing threshold was calculated as the mean value of the thresholds for 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 Hz. A paired-samples t-test was used for comparison of the preoperative and postoperative air and bone conduction hearing thresholds and air-bone gaps. RESULTS: Significant recovery was found in the postoperative air conduction threshold and air-bone gap in both the temporalis fascia and cartilage groups as compared to those before surgery (p < 0.001). However, the average air and bone conduction thresholds and air-bone gap were found to be statistically different after surgery in the cartilage group as compared to those in the temporalis fascia group. There was no significant difference in hearing parameters before and after surgery in patients with or without mastoidectomy in either the cartilage group or the temporalis fascia group. CONCLUSIONS: The hearing gain in patients with cartilage shield grafting was better than that in those who had temporalis fascia tympanoplasty, although experimental analysis shows loss of acoustic energy for thick and large shield cartilage grafts.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the long-term functional results of tympanic membrane reconstruction with temporalis fascia and cartilage shield grafting. METHODS: This study includes 113 patients who had tympanoplasty type I tympanic membrane reconstruction between 1997 and 2007, 47 with tragal cartilage and 66 with temporalis fascia. Fourteen patients in the cartilage group and 9 patients in the temporalis fascia group also had mastoidectomy. The average follow-up was 3.2 years. The hearing threshold was calculated as the mean value of the thresholds for 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 Hz. A paired-samples t-test was used for comparison of the preoperative and postoperative air and bone conduction hearing thresholds and air-bone gaps. RESULTS: Significant recovery was found in the postoperative air conduction threshold and air-bone gap in both the temporalis fascia and cartilage groups as compared to those before surgery (p < 0.001). However, the average air and bone conduction thresholds and air-bone gap were found to be statistically different after surgery in the cartilage group as compared to those in the temporalis fascia group. There was no significant difference in hearing parameters before and after surgery in patients with or without mastoidectomy in either the cartilage group or the temporalis fascia group. CONCLUSIONS: The hearing gain in patients with cartilage shield grafting was better than that in those who had temporalis fascia tympanoplasty, although experimental analysis shows loss of acoustic energy for thick and large shield cartilage grafts.