Literature DB >> 19746728

Effect of groundwater iron and phosphate on the efficacy of arsenic removal by iron-amended BioSand filters.

Hannah Chiew1, M L Sampson, Sokhan Huch, Sreymom Ken, Benjamin C Bostick.   

Abstract

Naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater in Cambodia is a serious health concern. This study tested the efficacy of a BioSand filter amended with iron nails, Kanchan filter, as a household water treatment option with three natural arsenic-bearing groundwater sources of varying compositions and spiked with lab cultured E. coli and MS2. The effectiveness of arsenic and pathogen removal was not constant over time and was highly dependent on the influent composition. The filter was relatively ineffective in treating arsenic contaminated groundwater and effluent arsenic concentrations were between 74 and 2206 microg L(-1), which is higher than accepted drinkng water standards. The overall average arsenic removal was 39.4, 74.9, and 45.4%, respectively, and the extent of arsenic removal was not related to the influent arsenic concentration. The main reasons for poor arsenic removal was due to the combination of high influent P (> 0.5 mg L(-1)) and low Fe (< 5 mg L(-1)) concentrations and that the added iron nails were largely ineffective due to insufficient contact time withthe water. The findings suggest that such amended filters should not be widely deployed until improvements are made to address the consistency and efficacy of treatment In addition, the filter poses some potential health risk associated with the production of elevated nitrate levels in the effluent within the filter, possibly due to nitrification and high levels of ammonia in the groundwater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19746728     DOI: 10.1021/es803444t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Factors associated with arsenicosis and arsenic exposure status in Nepal: implications from community based study.

Authors:  Narendra Maden; Anjana Singh; Linda S Smith; Makhan Maharjan; Shreekrishna Shrestha
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-02

2.  Removing arsenic from groundwater in Cambodia using high performance iron adsorbent.

Authors:  Y Kang; R Takeda; A Nada; L Thavarith; S Tang; K Nuki; K Sakurai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Arsenic geochemistry of groundwater in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Kyoung-Woong Kim; Penradee Chanpiwat; Hoang Thi Hanh; Kongkea Phan; Suthipong Sthiannopkao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a review of sources, prevalence, health risks, and strategies for mitigation.

Authors:  Shiv Shankar; Uma Shanker
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-14

5.  Effect of supernatant water level on As removal in biological rapid sand filters.

Authors:  J C J Gude; K Joris; K Huysman; L C Rietveld; D van Halem
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2018-11-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.