Literature DB >> 19745690

Clinical risk stratification in the emergency department predicts long-term cardiovascular outcomes in a population-based cohort presenting with acute chest pain: primary results of the Olmsted county chest pain study.

Michael E Farkouh1, Ashish Aneja, Guy S Reeder, Peter A Smars, Sameer Bansilal, Ryan J Lennon, Heather J Wiste, Louai Razzouk, Kay Traverse, David R Holmes, Verghese Mathew.   

Abstract

The long-term cardiovascular outcomes of a population-based cohort presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and classified with a clinical risk stratification algorithm are not well documented. The Olmsted County Chest Pain Study is a community-based study that included all consecutive patients presenting with chest pain consistent with unstable angina presenting to all EDs in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Patients were classified according to the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) criteria. Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and chest pain of noncardiac origin were excluded. Main outcome measures were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days and at a median follow-up of 7.3 years, and mortality through a median of 16.6 years.The 2271 patients were classified as follows: 436 (19.2%) as high risk, 1557 (68.6%) as intermediate risk, and 278 (12.2%) as low risk. Thirty-day MACCE occurred in 11.5% in the high-risk group, 6.2% in the intermediate-risk group, and 2.5% in the low-risk group (p < 0.001). At 7.3 years, significantly more MACCE were recorded in the intermediate-risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.33-2.75) and high-risk groups (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.67-3.58). Intermediate- and high-risk patients demonstrated a 1.38-fold (95% CI, 0.95-2.01; p = 0.09) and a 1.68-fold (95% CI, 1.13-2.50; p = 0.011) higher mortality, respectively, compared to low-risk patients at 16.6 years. At 7.3 and at 16.6 years of follow-up, biomarkers were not incrementally predictive of cardiovascular risk.In conclusion, a widely applicable rapid clinical algorithm using AHCPR criteria can reliably predict long-term mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. This algorithm, when applied in the ED, affords an excellent opportunity to identify patients who might benefit from a more aggressive cardiovascular risk factor management strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19745690      PMCID: PMC3845366          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181b98782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  24 in total

1.  Validation of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) classification for managing unstable angina.

Authors:  C Brotons; G Permanyer-Miralda; F Calvo; M Campreciós; M T Santos; P Cascant; I Moral; A Ribera; J Soler-Soler
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Serum protein measurements and the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A K Ellis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators.

Authors:  M E Farkouh; P A Smars; G S Reeder; A R Zinsmeister; R W Evans; T D Meloy; S L Kopecky; M Allen; T G Allison; R J Gibbons; S E Gabriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Are we appropriately triaging patients with unstable angina?

Authors:  Mardi Gomberg-Maitland; Sabina A Murphy; David J Moliterno; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Unstable angina. A classification.

Authors:  E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Unstable angina: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  P Théroux; R M Lidón
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.200

7.  Usefulness of the TIMI Risk Index in predicting short- and long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Leonard Ilkhanoff; Christopher J O'Donnell; Carlos A Camargo; T David O'Halloran; Robert P Giugliano; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator in patients with unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  H K Gold; J A Johns; R C Leinbach; T Yasuda; E Grossbard; R Zusman; D Collen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.

Authors:  H D Lewis; J W Davis; D G Archibald; W E Steinke; T C Smitherman; J E Doherty; H W Schnaper; M M LeWinter; E Linares; J M Pouget; S C Sabharwal; E Chesler; H DeMots
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Risk stratification in unstable angina. Prospective validation of the Braunwald classification.

Authors:  J E Calvin; L W Klein; B J VandenBerg; P Meyer; J V Condon; R J Snell; L M Ramirez-Morgen; J E Parrillo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging techniques for the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.

Authors:  Devang M Dave; Maros Ferencic; Udo Hoffmann; James E Udelson
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.200

2.  Predictive value of a 4-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol in patients with suspected ischemic chest pain presenting to an emergency department.

Authors:  Mamatha P R Rao; Prashanth Panduranga; Mohammed Al-Mukhaini; Kadhim Sulaiman; Mahmood Al-Jufaili
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2012-05

Review 3.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; David A Bluemke; Deborah Diercks; Michael E Farkouh; J Lee Garvey; Michael C Kontos; James McCord; Todd D Miller; Anthony Morise; L Kristin Newby; Frederick L Ruberg; Kristine Anne Scordo; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Biomarkers after risk stratification in acute chest pain (from the BRIC Study).

Authors:  Shiny Mathewkutty; Sanjum S Sethi; Ashish Aneja; Kshitij Shah; Rupa L Iyengar; Luke Hermann; Sayyar Khakimov; Louai Razzouk; Ricardo Esquitin; Rajesh Vedanthan; Terrie-Ann Benjamin; Marie Grace; Rosane Nisenbaum; Krishnan Ramanathan; Lakshmi Ramanathan; James Chesebro; Michael E Farkouh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Multimorbidity in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Is Associated With Greater Mortality, Higher Readmission Rates, and Increased Length of Stay: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katherine Breen; Lorna Finnegan; Karen Vuckovic; Anne Fink; Wayne Rosamond; Holli A DeVon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  The Value of Continuous ST-Segment Monitoring in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Leonie Rose Bovino; Marjorie Funk; Michele M Pelter; Mayur M Desai; Vanessa Jefferson; Laura Kierol Andrews; Kenneth Forte
Journal:  Adv Emerg Nurs J       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

7.  Artificial Intelligence to Assist in Exclusion of Coronary Atherosclerosis During CCTA Evaluation of Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Preparing an Application for Real-world Use.

Authors:  Richard D White; Barbaros S Erdal; Mutlu Demirer; Vikash Gupta; Matthew T Bigelow; Engin Dikici; Sema Candemir; Mauricio S Galizia; Jessica L Carpenter; Thomas P O'Donnell; Abdul H Halabi; Luciano M Prevedello
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.903

8.  Long-term cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Authors:  Charles Reynard; Brian McMillan; Anisa Jafar; Anthony Heagerty; Glen Philip Martin; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Richard Body
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Nuclear scan strategy and outcomes in chest pain patients value of stress testing with dipyridamole or adenosine.

Authors:  Alberto Conti; Yuri Mariannini; Erica Canuti; Tetyana Petrova; Francesca Innocenti; Maurizio Zanobetti; Chiara Gallini; Egidio Costanzo
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-05

10.  Acute coronary syndrome risk prediction of rapid emergency medicine scoring system in acute chest pain. An observational study of patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department in Central Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Tahir Mehmood; Mohammad S Al Shehrani; Muhammad Ahmad
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.484

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.