Literature DB >> 19745215

Trial of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccine.

Tristan W Clark1, Manish Pareek, Katja Hoschler, Helen Dillon, Karl G Nicholson, Nicola Groth, Iain Stephenson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus has emerged to cause the first pandemic of the 21st century. Development of effective vaccines is a public health priority.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center study, involving 176 adults, 18 to 50 years of age, to test the monovalent influenza A/California/2009 (H1N1) surface-antigen vaccine, in both MF59-adjuvanted and nonadjuvanted forms. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive two intramuscular injections of vaccine containing 7.5 microg of hemagglutinin on day 0 in each arm or one injection on day 0 and the other on day 7, 14, or 21; or two 3.75-microg doses of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, or 7.5 or 15 microg of nonadjuvanted vaccine, administered 21 days apart. Antibody responses were measured by means of hemagglutination-inhibition assay and a microneutralization assay on days 0, 14, 21, and 42 after injection of the first dose.
RESULTS: The most frequent local and systemic reactions were pain at the injection site and muscle aches, noted in 70% and 42% of subjects, respectively; reactions were more common with the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine than with nonadjuvanted vaccine. Three subjects reported fever, with a temperature of 38 degrees C or higher, after either dose. Antibody titers, expressed as geometric means, were higher at day 21 among subjects who had received one dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine than among those who had received one dose of nonadjuvanted vaccine (P<0.001 by the microneutralization assay). By day 21, hemagglutination-inhibition and microneutralization antibody titers of 1:40 or more were seen in 77 to 96% and 92 to 100% of subjects receiving MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, respectively, and in 63 to 72% and 67 to 76% of those receiving nonadjuvanted vaccine, respectively. By day 42, after two doses of vaccine, hemagglutination-inhibition and microneutralization antibody titers of 1:40 or more were seen in 92 to 100% and 100% of recipients of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, respectively, and in 74 to 79% and 78 to 83% of recipients of nonadjuvanted vaccine, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted vaccine generates antibody responses likely to be associated with protection after a single dose is administered. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00943358). Copyright 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19745215     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  156 in total

1.  MF59 adjuvant enhances diversity and affinity of antibody-mediated immune response to pandemic influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Surender Khurana; Nitin Verma; Jonathan W Yewdell; Anne Katrin Hilbert; Flora Castellino; Maria Lattanzi; Giuseppe Del Giudice; Rino Rappuoli; Hana Golding
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  Inactivated influenza vaccines: recent progress and implications for the elderly.

Authors:  Valentina Parodi; Daniela de Florentiis; Mariano Martini; Filippo Ansaldi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Seasonal H1N1 influenza virus infection induces cross-protective pandemic H1N1 virus immunity through a CD8-independent, B cell-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Yuan Fang; David Banner; Alyson A Kelvin; Stephen S H Huang; Christopher J Paige; Steven A Corfe; Kevin P Kane; R Chris Bleackley; Thomas Rowe; Alberto J Leon; David J Kelvin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Enhanced growth of influenza vaccine seed viruses in vero cells mediated by broadening the optimal pH range for virus membrane fusion.

Authors:  Shin Murakami; Taisuke Horimoto; Mutsumi Ito; Ryo Takano; Hiroaki Katsura; Masayuki Shimojima; Yoshihiro Kawaoka
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Persistence of immunogenicity of a monovalent influenza virus A/H1N1 2009 vaccine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Lai; Kuen-Cheh Yang; Szu-Min Hsieh; Chien-An Yao; Long-Teng Lee; Kuo-Chin Huang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-01-18

6.  Calcium phosphate nanoparticle (CaPNP) for dose-sparing of inactivated whole virus pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine in mice.

Authors:  Tülin Morçӧl; Brett L Hurst; E Bart Tarbet
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Repeated vaccination is required to optimize seroprotection against H1N1 in the immunocompromised host.

Authors:  Hugues de Lavallade; Paula Garland; Takuya Sekine; Katja Hoschler; David Marin; Kate Stringaris; Eva Loucaides; Katherine Howe; Richard Szydlo; Ed Kanfer; Donald Macdonald; Peter Kelleher; Nichola Cooper; Ahmad Khoder; Ian H Gabriel; Dragana Milojkovic; Jiri Pavlu; John M Goldman; Jane F Apperley; Katayoun Rezvani
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  The long-term immunogenicity of an inactivated split-virion 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 vaccine: Randomized, observer-masked, single-center clinical study.

Authors:  Zhongdong Yang; Shilei Wang; Wei Li; Changgui Li; Jinrong Dong; Fangjun Li; Shuqiao Wang; Wenqing Chai; Bing Sun; Ze Chen
Journal:  Results Immunol       Date:  2012-10-09

Review 9.  Traditional and new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Assessment of squalene adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines against pandemic H1N1 influenza in children 6 months to 17 years of age.

Authors:  Timo Vesikari; Stéphanie Pepin; Inca Kusters; Agnès Hoffenbach; Martine Denis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.