BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if the APOE epsilon4 allele influences both the functional activation and connectivity of the medial temporal lobes (MTLs) during successful memory encoding in young adults. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy young adults, i.e., 12 carriers and 12 noncarriers of the APOE epsilon4 allele, were scanned in a subsequent-memory paradigm, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The neuroanatomic correlates of successful encoding were measured as greater neural activity for subsequently remembered versus forgotten task items, or in short, encoding success activity (ESA). Group differences in ESA within the MTLs, as well as whole-brain functional connectivity with the MTLs, were assessed. RESULTS: In the absence of demographic or performance differences, APOE epsilon4 allele carriers exhibited greater bilateral MTL activity relative to noncarriers while accomplishing the same encoding task. Moreover, whereas epsilon4 carriers demonstrated a greater functional connectivity of ESA-related MTL activity with the posterior cingulate and other peri-limbic regions, reductions in overall connectivity were found across the anterior and posterior cortices. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the APOE varepsilon4 allele may influence not only functional activations within the MTL, but functional connectivity of the MTLs to other regions implicated in memory encoding. Enhanced functional connectivity of the MTLs with the posterior cingulate in young adult epsilon4 carriers suggests that APOE may be expressed early in brain regions known to be involved in Alzheimer's disease, long before late-onset dementia is a practical risk or consideration. These functional connectivity differences may also reflect pleiotropic effects of APOE during early development. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if the APOE epsilon4 allele influences both the functional activation and connectivity of the medial temporal lobes (MTLs) during successful memory encoding in young adults. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy young adults, i.e., 12 carriers and 12 noncarriers of the APOE epsilon4 allele, were scanned in a subsequent-memory paradigm, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The neuroanatomic correlates of successful encoding were measured as greater neural activity for subsequently remembered versus forgotten task items, or in short, encoding success activity (ESA). Group differences in ESA within the MTLs, as well as whole-brain functional connectivity with the MTLs, were assessed. RESULTS: In the absence of demographic or performance differences, APOE epsilon4 allele carriers exhibited greater bilateral MTL activity relative to noncarriers while accomplishing the same encoding task. Moreover, whereas epsilon4 carriers demonstrated a greater functional connectivity of ESA-related MTL activity with the posterior cingulate and other peri-limbic regions, reductions in overall connectivity were found across the anterior and posterior cortices. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the APOE varepsilon4 allele may influence not only functional activations within the MTL, but functional connectivity of the MTLs to other regions implicated in memory encoding. Enhanced functional connectivity of the MTLs with the posterior cingulate in young adult epsilon4 carriers suggests that APOE may be expressed early in brain regions known to be involved in Alzheimer's disease, long before late-onset dementia is a practical risk or consideration. These functional connectivity differences may also reflect pleiotropic effects of APOE during early development. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Heather A Wishart; Andrew J Saykin; Laura A Rabin; Robert B Santulli; Laura A Flashman; Stephen J Guerin; Alexander C Mamourian; Dorothy R Belloni; C Harker Rhodes; Thomas W McAllister Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Eric M Reiman; Kewei Chen; Gene E Alexander; Richard J Caselli; Daniel Bandy; David Osborne; Ann M Saunders; John Hardy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: S Duke Han; Wes S Houston; Amy J Jak; Lisa T Eyler; Bonnie J Nagel; Adam S Fleisher; Gregory G Brown; Jody Corey-Bloom; David P Salmon; Leon J Thal; Mark W Bondi Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: M Morishima-Kawashima; N Oshima; H Ogata; H Yamaguchi; M Yoshimura; S Sugihara; Y Ihara Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Kewei Chen; Eric M Reiman; Gene E Alexander; Richard J Caselli; Richard Gerkin; Daniel Bandy; Alisa Domb; David Osborne; Nick Fox; William R Crum; Ann M Saunders; John Hardy Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Gene E Alexander; Kaitlin L Bergfield; Kewei Chen; Eric M Reiman; Krista D Hanson; Lan Lin; Daniel Bandy; Richard J Caselli; James R Moeller Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Adam E Green; Jeremy R Gray; Colin G Deyoung; Timothy R Mhyre; Robert Padilla; Amanda M Dibattista; G William Rebeck Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Willem Huijbers; Aaron P Schultz; Kathryn V Papp; Molly R LaPoint; Bernard Hanseeuw; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Trey Hedden; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Neha Sinha; Chelsie N Berg; Nicholas J Tustison; Ashlee Shaw; Diane Hill; Michael A Yassa; Mark A Gluck Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-05-26 Impact factor: 4.673