OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether emergency thoracotomy (ET) performed in pre-hospital settings contributed to saving the lives of blunt trauma patients with impending or recent cardiac arrest. METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive cardiac arrest patients with blunt trauma were performed ET before or after arrival at the emergency department (ED). These were reviewed retrospectively and were classified into the following three groups: (1) an emergency field thoracotomy was performed (EFT group, n=34); (2) a doctor dispatched to the scene, but the thoracotomy was performed in the ED (EDT-a group, n=10); and (3) no doctor dispatched to the scene, and the thoracotomy was performed in the ED (EDT-b group, n=37). The patients in the EFT and EDT-a groups were managed within the Japanese helicopter emergency medical service system with a doctor dispatched to the scene. RESULT: The time between the arrival of the EMT at the scene and the start of the thoracotomy was significantly shorter in the EFT group than in the EDT-b group (19.2+/-7.9 min vs. 30.7+/-6.8 min, p<0.001). In the EFT group, the "ICU admission" rate was significantly higher among the patients who experienced cardiac arrest after the EMT arrival than among the patients who experienced cardiac arrest before the EMT arrival (70% vs. 8%, p=0.001). Unfortunately, however, there were no survivors in this series. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that "early access" to a doctor's expertise and the performance of an "emergency field thoracotomy" might be two important factors for improving the possibility of saving the lives of blunt trauma patients with impending or recent cardiac arrest.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether emergency thoracotomy (ET) performed in pre-hospital settings contributed to saving the lives of blunt traumapatients with impending or recent cardiac arrest. METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive cardiac arrestpatients with blunt trauma were performed ET before or after arrival at the emergency department (ED). These were reviewed retrospectively and were classified into the following three groups: (1) an emergency field thoracotomy was performed (EFT group, n=34); (2) a doctor dispatched to the scene, but the thoracotomy was performed in the ED (EDT-a group, n=10); and (3) no doctor dispatched to the scene, and the thoracotomy was performed in the ED (EDT-b group, n=37). The patients in the EFT and EDT-a groups were managed within the Japanese helicopter emergency medical service system with a doctor dispatched to the scene. RESULT: The time between the arrival of the EMT at the scene and the start of the thoracotomy was significantly shorter in the EFT group than in the EDT-b group (19.2+/-7.9 min vs. 30.7+/-6.8 min, p<0.001). In the EFT group, the "ICU admission" rate was significantly higher among the patients who experienced cardiac arrest after the EMT arrival than among the patients who experienced cardiac arrest before the EMT arrival (70% vs. 8%, p=0.001). Unfortunately, however, there were no survivors in this series. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that "early access" to a doctor's expertise and the performance of an "emergency field thoracotomy" might be two important factors for improving the possibility of saving the lives of blunt traumapatients with impending or recent cardiac arrest.
Authors: Janosch Dahmen; Marko Brade; Christian Gerach; Martin Glombitza; Jan Schmitz; Simon Zeitter; Eva Steinhausen Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Edward J Nevins; Parisa L Moori; Jonathan Smith-Williams; Nicholas T E Bird; John V Taylor; Nikhil Misra Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 3.693