Laura E Danielian1, Nobue K Iwata, David M Thomasson, Mary Kay Floeter. 1. EMG Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive MSC 1404, Bldg. 10, Rm 7-5680, Bethesda, MD 20892-1404, USA. danielil@ninds.nih.gov
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The statistical reliability of diffusion property measurements was evaluated in ten healthy subjects using deterministic fiber tracking to localize tracts affected in motor neuron disease: corticospinal tract (CST), uncinate fasciculus (UNC), and the corpus callosum in its entirety (CC), and its genu (GE), motor (CCM), and splenium (SP) fibers separately. Measurements of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (lambda(1)), transverse diffusivity (lambda( perpendicular)), and volume of voxels containing fibers (VV) were obtained within each tract. To assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, two raters carried out fiber tracking five times on each scan. Scan-rescan and longitudinal reliability were assessed in a subset of four subjects who had six scans, with two sets of three scans separated by 1 year. The statistical reliability of repeated measurements was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV). Spatial agreement of tract shape was assessed using the kappa (kappa) statistic. RESULTS: Repeated same-scan fiber tracking evaluations showed good geometric alignment (intra-rater kappa >0.90, inter-rater kappa >0.76) and reliable diffusion property measurements (intra-rater ICC >0.92, inter-rater ICC >0.77). FA, MD, and lambda( perpendicular) were highly reliable with repeated scans on different days, up to a year apart (ICC >0.8). VV also exhibited good reliability, but with higher CVs. We were unable to demonstrate reproducibility of lambda(1). Longitudinal reliability after one year was improved by averaging measurements from multiple scans at each time point. Fiber tracking provides a reliable tool for the longitudinal evaluation of white matter diffusion properties.
UNLABELLED: The statistical reliability of diffusion property measurements was evaluated in ten healthy subjects using deterministic fiber tracking to localize tracts affected in motor neuron disease: corticospinal tract (CST), uncinate fasciculus (UNC), and the corpus callosum in its entirety (CC), and its genu (GE), motor (CCM), and splenium (SP) fibers separately. Measurements of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (lambda(1)), transverse diffusivity (lambda( perpendicular)), and volume of voxels containing fibers (VV) were obtained within each tract. To assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, two raters carried out fiber tracking five times on each scan. Scan-rescan and longitudinal reliability were assessed in a subset of four subjects who had six scans, with two sets of three scans separated by 1 year. The statistical reliability of repeated measurements was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV). Spatial agreement of tract shape was assessed using the kappa (kappa) statistic. RESULTS: Repeated same-scan fiber tracking evaluations showed good geometric alignment (intra-rater kappa >0.90, inter-rater kappa >0.76) and reliable diffusion property measurements (intra-rater ICC >0.92, inter-rater ICC >0.77). FA, MD, and lambda( perpendicular) were highly reliable with repeated scans on different days, up to a year apart (ICC >0.8). VV also exhibited good reliability, but with higher CVs. We were unable to demonstrate reproducibility of lambda(1). Longitudinal reliability after one year was improved by averaging measurements from multiple scans at each time point. Fiber tracking provides a reliable tool for the longitudinal evaluation of white matter diffusion properties.
Authors: Setsu Wakana; Arvind Caprihan; Martina M Panzenboeck; James H Fallon; Michele Perry; Randy L Gollub; Kegang Hua; Jiangyang Zhang; Hangyi Jiang; Prachi Dubey; Ari Blitz; Peter van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Nikolai Malykhin; Luis Concha; Peter Seres; Christian Beaulieu; Nicholas J Coupland Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: S Rodrigo; C Oppenheim; F Chassoux; N Golestani; Y Cointepas; C Poupon; F Semah; J-F Mangin; D Le Bihan; J-F Meder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-01-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Bejoy Thomas; Maria Eyssen; Ronald Peeters; Guy Molenaers; Paul Van Hecke; Paul De Cock; Stefan Sunaert Journal: Brain Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Donald J Hagler; Mazyar E Ahmadi; Joshua Kuperman; Dominic Holland; Carrie R McDonald; Eric Halgren; Anders M Dale Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Khader M Hasan; Amal Iftikhar; Arash Kamali; Larry A Kramer; Manzar Ashtari; Paul T Cirino; Andrew C Papanicolaou; Jack M Fletcher; Linda Ewing-Cobbs Journal: Brain Res Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: A G Floyd; Q P Yu; P Piboolnurak; M X Tang; Y Fang; W A Smith; J Yim; L P Rowland; H Mitsumoto; S L Pullman Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David J Schaeffer; Ramina Adam; Kyle M Gilbert; Joseph S Gati; Alex X Li; Ravi S Menon; Stefan Everling Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Yi-Ou Li; Fanpei G Yang; Christopher T Nguyen; Shelly R Cooper; Sara C LaHue; Sandya Venugopal; Pratik Mukherjee Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Vincent A Magnotta; Joy T Matsui; Dawei Liu; Hans J Johnson; Jeffrey D Long; Bradley D Bolster; Bryon A Mueller; Kelvin Lim; Susumu Mori; Karl G Helmer; Jessica A Turner; Sarah Reading; Mark J Lowe; Elizabeth Aylward; Laura A Flashman; Greg Bonett; Jane S Paulsen Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2012
Authors: Timo Kurki; Leena Himanen; Elina Vuorinen; Anna Myllyniemi; Anna-Riitta Saarenketo; Tommi Kauko; Nina Brandstack; Olli Tenovuo Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 2.804