Literature DB >> 19744289

A concept taxonomy and an instrument hierarchy: tools for establishing and evaluating the conceptual framework of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument as applied to product labeling claims.

Pennifer Erickson1, Richard Willke, Laurie Burke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To facilitate development and evaluation of a PRO instrument conceptual framework, we propose two tools--a PRO concept taxonomy and a PRO instrument hierarchy. FDA's draft guidance on patient reported outcome (PRO) measures states that a clear description of the conceptual framework of an instrument is useful for evaluating its adequacy to support a treatment benefit claim for use in product labeling the draft guidance, however does not propose tools for establishing or evaluating a PRO instrument's conceptual framework.
METHODS: We draw from our review of PRO concepts and instruments that appear in prescription drug labeling approved in the United States from 1997 to 2007.
RESULTS: We propose taxonomy terms that define relationships between PRO concepts, including "family,""compound concept," and "singular concept." Based on the range of complexity represented by the concepts, as defined by the taxonomy, we propose nine instrument orders for PRO measurement. The nine orders range from individual event counts to multi-item, multiscale instruments.
CONCLUSION: This analysis of PRO concepts and instruments illustrates that the taxonomy and hierarchy are applicable to PRO concepts across a wide range of therapeutic areas and provide a basis for defining the instrument conceptual framework complexity. Although the utility of these tools in the drug development, review, and approval processes has not yet been demonstrated, these tools could be useful to improve communication and enhance efficiency in the instrument development and review process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744289     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  7 in total

Review 1.  ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Albert W Wu; Galina Velikova; Caroline B Terwee; Claire F Snyder; Carolyn Schwartz; Dennis A Revicki; Carol M Moinpour; Lori D McLeod; Jessica C Lyons; William R Lenderking; Pamela S Hinds; Ron D Hays; Joanne Greenhalgh; Richard Gershon; David Feeny; Peter M Fayers; David Cella; Michael Brundage; Sara Ahmed; Neil K Aaronson; Zeeshan Butt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Michaela A Dinan; Kate L Compton; Jatinder K Dhillon; Bradley G Hammill; Esi Morgan Dewitt; Kevin P Weinfurt; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  How do gastroenterologists assess overall activity of eosinophilic esophagitis in adult patients?

Authors:  Alain M Schoepfer; Radoslaw Panczak; Marcel Zwahlen; Claudia E Kuehni; Michael Coslovsky; Elisabeth Maurer; Nadine A Haas; Jeffrey A Alexander; Evan S Dellon; Nirmala Gonsalves; Ikuo Hirano; John Leung; Christian Bussmann; Margaret H Collins; Robert O Newbury; Giovanni De Petris; Thomas C Smyrk; John T Woosley; Pu Yan; Guang-Yu Yang; Yvonne Romero; David A Katzka; Glenn T Furuta; Sandeep K Gupta; Seema S Aceves; Mirna Chehade; Carine Blanchard; Alex Straumann; Ekaterina Safroneeva
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  [DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 2) - Operationalisation and Measuring of Health Literacy from a Health Services Research Perspective].

Authors:  Stephanie Stock; Anna Isselhard; Saskia Jünger; Stefan Peters; Gundolf Schneider; Frederik Haarig; Sarah Halbach; Orkan Okan; Florian Fischer; Torsten Michael Bollweg; Ullrich Bauer; Doris Schaeffer; Dominique Vogt; Eva-Maria Berens; Nicole Ernstmann; Eva Maria Bitzer
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Patient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim.

Authors:  Lynda C Doward; Ari Gnanasakthy; Mary G Baker
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Development and validation of a symptom-based activity index for adults with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Alain M Schoepfer; Alex Straumann; Radoslaw Panczak; Michael Coslovsky; Claudia E Kuehni; Elisabeth Maurer; Nadine A Haas; Yvonne Romero; Ikuo Hirano; Jeffrey A Alexander; Nirmala Gonsalves; Glenn T Furuta; Evan S Dellon; John Leung; Margaret H Collins; Christian Bussmann; Peter Netzer; Sandeep K Gupta; Seema S Aceves; Mirna Chehade; Fouad J Moawad; Felicity T Enders; Kathleen J Yost; Tiffany H Taft; Emily Kern; Marcel Zwahlen; Ekaterina Safroneeva
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Symptoms Have Modest Accuracy in Detecting Endoscopic and Histologic Remission in Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Ekaterina Safroneeva; Alex Straumann; Michael Coslovsky; Marcel Zwahlen; Claudia E Kuehni; Radoslaw Panczak; Nadine A Haas; Jeffrey A Alexander; Evan S Dellon; Nirmala Gonsalves; Ikuo Hirano; John Leung; Christian Bussmann; Margaret H Collins; Robert O Newbury; Giovanni De Petris; Thomas C Smyrk; John T Woosley; Pu Yan; Guang-Yu Yang; Yvonne Romero; David A Katzka; Glenn T Furuta; Sandeep K Gupta; Seema S Aceves; Mirna Chehade; Jonathan M Spergel; Alain M Schoepfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 22.682

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.