S Yaemsiri1, N Hou, M M Slining, K He. 1. Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human nail clippings are increasingly used in epidemiological studies as biomarkers for assessing diet and environmental exposure to trace elements or other chemical compounds. However, little is known about the growth rate of human nails. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the average growth rate of fingernails and toenails and examine factors that may influence nail growth rate. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy American young adults marked their nails close to the proximal nail fold with a provided nail file following a standardized protocol, and recorded the date and the distance from the proximal nail fold to the mark. One to three months later, participants recorded the date and distance from the proximal nail fold to the mark again. Nail growth rate was calculated based on recorded distance and time between the two measurements. RESULTS: Average fingernail growth rate was faster than that of toenails (3.47 vs. 1.62 mm/month, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between right and left fingernail/toenail growth rates. The little fingernail grew slower than other fingernails (P < 0.01); the great toenail grew faster than other toenails (P < 0.01). Younger age, male gender, and onychophagia were associated with faster nail growth rate; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Nail growth rates have increased compared with previous estimates conducted decades ago. Toenail clippings may reflect a long exposure time frame given the relatively slow growth rate.
BACKGROUND:Human nail clippings are increasingly used in epidemiological studies as biomarkers for assessing diet and environmental exposure to trace elements or other chemical compounds. However, little is known about the growth rate of human nails. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the average growth rate of fingernails and toenails and examine factors that may influence nail growth rate. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy American young adults marked their nails close to the proximal nail fold with a provided nail file following a standardized protocol, and recorded the date and the distance from the proximal nail fold to the mark. One to three months later, participants recorded the date and distance from the proximal nail fold to the mark again. Nail growth rate was calculated based on recorded distance and time between the two measurements. RESULTS: Average fingernail growth rate was faster than that of toenails (3.47 vs. 1.62 mm/month, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between right and left fingernail/toenail growth rates. The little fingernail grew slower than other fingernails (P < 0.01); the great toenail grew faster than other toenails (P < 0.01). Younger age, male gender, and onychophagia were associated with faster nail growth rate; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Nail growth rates have increased compared with previous estimates conducted decades ago. Toenail clippings may reflect a long exposure time frame given the relatively slow growth rate.
Authors: Tracy Punshon; Zhigang Li; Carmen J Marsit; Brian P Jackson; Emily R Baker; Margaret R Karagas Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Wisanti Laohaudomchok; Xihong Lin; Robert F Herrick; Shona C Fang; Jennifer M Cavallari; David C Christiani; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Eric J Ward; David A Edmondson; Mahmoud M Nour; Sandy Snyder; Frank S Rosenthal; Ulrike Dydak Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Danelle Rolle-McFarland; Yingzi Liu; Farshad Mostafaei; S Elizabeth Zauber; Yuanzhong Zhou; Yan Li; Qiyuan Fan; Wei Zheng; Linda H Nie; Ellen M Wells Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Alexandra J White; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Dale P Sandler; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Alexandra J White; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Dale P Sandler; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897