A A Lake1, T Townshend, S Alvanides, E Stamp, A J Adamson. 1. Human Nutrition Research Centre, IHS, Medical School, HNRC Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, UK. amelia.lake@ncl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored both food behaviour and physical activity in an environmental context. Most research in this area has focused on adults; the aim of the present study was to describe perceptions of the environment, diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour patterns in 16-20 year olds in full-time education (Newcastle, UK). METHODS: Participants (n = 73) recruited from a college and sixth-form college completed a UK version of the Youth Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Survey, which included measures of sedentary behaviour. A validated food frequency questionnaire was completed and a factor applied to produce an estimated mean daily frequency of intake of each item, which was converted to nutrient intakes. A rank for Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) was assigned to their home postcode. Analysis explored associations between sedentary behaviours and nutrient intake. RESULTS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, most participants reported being physically active for at least 1 h day(-1) on 3-4 (n = 28) or 5-7 days (n = 31). There were no significant differences in nutrient intake according to sample quartile IMD position. Sedentary behaviours were significantly associated with less healthy eating patterns. Higher total energy (P = 0.02), higher fat (P = 0.005), percentage energy from fat (P = 0.035) and lower carbohydrate intakes (P = 0.004) were significantly associated with more time spent watching DVDs at the weekend. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of sedentary behaviour and less healthy eating patterns has important implications for long-term health (e.g. the tracking of being overweight and obesity from adolescence into adulthood). Understanding behaviour relationships is an important step in developing interventions in this age group.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored both food behaviour and physical activity in an environmental context. Most research in this area has focused on adults; the aim of the present study was to describe perceptions of the environment, diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour patterns in 16-20 year olds in full-time education (Newcastle, UK). METHODS:Participants (n = 73) recruited from a college and sixth-form college completed a UK version of the Youth Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Survey, which included measures of sedentary behaviour. A validated food frequency questionnaire was completed and a factor applied to produce an estimated mean daily frequency of intake of each item, which was converted to nutrient intakes. A rank for Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) was assigned to their home postcode. Analysis explored associations between sedentary behaviours and nutrient intake. RESULTS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, most participants reported being physically active for at least 1 h day(-1) on 3-4 (n = 28) or 5-7 days (n = 31). There were no significant differences in nutrient intake according to sample quartile IMD position. Sedentary behaviours were significantly associated with less healthy eating patterns. Higher total energy (P = 0.02), higher fat (P = 0.005), percentage energy from fat (P = 0.035) and lower carbohydrate intakes (P = 0.004) were significantly associated with more time spent watching DVDs at the weekend. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of sedentary behaviour and less healthy eating patterns has important implications for long-term health (e.g. the tracking of being overweight and obesity from adolescence into adulthood). Understanding behaviour relationships is an important step in developing interventions in this age group.
Authors: Alberto J Caban-Martinez; David J Lee; Elizabeth Goodman; Evelyn P Davila; Lora E Fleming; William G LeBlanc; Kristopher L Arheart; Kathryn E McCollister; Sharon L Christ; Frederick J Zimmerman; Carles Muntaner; Julie A Hollenbeck Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Joseph E Donnelly; Stephen D Herrmann; Kate Lambourne; Amanda N Szabo; Jeffery J Honas; Richard A Washburn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dagmar Sigmundová; František Chmelík; Erik Sigmund; Dana Feltlová; Karel Frömel Journal: Eur J Sport Sci Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: Suzannah D'Hooghe; Yasemin Inaç; Eva De Clercq; Benedicte Deforche; Sarah Dury; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Nico Van de Weghe; Delfien Van Dyck; Karin De Ridder Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2022-10-05
Authors: P A J Vissers; A P Jones; E M F van Sluijs; A Jennings; A Welch; A Cassidy; S J Griffin Journal: Public Health Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 2.427