OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the effects of different power densities of LLLT at 635 and 670 nm achieving a daily dose of 5 J/cm(2) on wound tensile strength (TS) in rats. BACKGROUND DATA: Optimal parameters of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) are still unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under general anesthesia, one full-thickness skin incision was performed on the back of each rat (n = 40) and immediately closed using an intradermal running suture. Rats were separated into five groups depending on treatment parameters: (1) sham irradiated control group (SIC); (2) 635 nm laser-treated group at 4 mW/cm(2) (L-635/4); (3) 635 nm laser-treated group at 15 mW/cm(2) (L-635/15); (4) 670 nm laser-treated group at 4 mW/cm(2) (L-670/4); and (5) 670 nm laser-treated group at 15 mW/cm(2) (L-670/15). The total daily dose was 5 J/cm(2). Seven days after surgery each wound was removed for wound TS measurement. RESULTS: The lowest wound TS results were measured in the SIC rats (10.5 +/- 2.8 g/mm(2)). Higher wound TS results were measured in group L-670/15 (11.5 +/- 2.5 g/mm(2)) and group L-635/4 (11.7 +/- 4.3 g/mm(2)) rats, while significantly higher results were found in group L-670/4 (15.8 +/- 4.4 g/mm(2)) and group L-635/15 (15.9 +/- 4.8 g/mm(2)). The differences were significant between certain groups (p < 0.01: SIC vs. L-635/15, SIC vs. L-670/4; p < 0.05: L-635/4 vs. L-635/15, L-635/4 vs. L-670/4, L-635/15 vs. L-670/15, L-670/4 vs. L-670/15). CONCLUSION: Both red lasers significantly increased wound TS at selected parameters. Whereas the 635 nm laser significantly improved wound healing by using the higher power density, the 670 nm laser improved healing using a lower power density.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the effects of different power densities of LLLT at 635 and 670 nm achieving a daily dose of 5 J/cm(2) on wound tensile strength (TS) in rats. BACKGROUND DATA: Optimal parameters of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) are still unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under general anesthesia, one full-thickness skin incision was performed on the back of each rat (n = 40) and immediately closed using an intradermal running suture. Rats were separated into five groups depending on treatment parameters: (1) sham irradiated control group (SIC); (2) 635 nm laser-treated group at 4 mW/cm(2) (L-635/4); (3) 635 nm laser-treated group at 15 mW/cm(2) (L-635/15); (4) 670 nm laser-treated group at 4 mW/cm(2) (L-670/4); and (5) 670 nm laser-treated group at 15 mW/cm(2) (L-670/15). The total daily dose was 5 J/cm(2). Seven days after surgery each wound was removed for wound TS measurement. RESULTS: The lowest wound TS results were measured in the SIC rats (10.5 +/- 2.8 g/mm(2)). Higher wound TS results were measured in group L-670/15 (11.5 +/- 2.5 g/mm(2)) and group L-635/4 (11.7 +/- 4.3 g/mm(2)) rats, while significantly higher results were found in group L-670/4 (15.8 +/- 4.4 g/mm(2)) and group L-635/15 (15.9 +/- 4.8 g/mm(2)). The differences were significant between certain groups (p < 0.01: SIC vs. L-635/15, SIC vs. L-670/4; p < 0.05: L-635/4 vs. L-635/15, L-635/4 vs. L-670/4, L-635/15 vs. L-670/15, L-670/4 vs. L-670/15). CONCLUSION: Both red lasers significantly increased wound TS at selected parameters. Whereas the 635 nm laser significantly improved wound healing by using the higher power density, the 670 nm laser improved healing using a lower power density.
Authors: Farzane Hendudari; Abbas Piryaei; Seyedeh-Nafiseh Hassani; Hasan Darbandi; Mohammad Bayat Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Peter Gál; Martin Bjørn Stausholm; Ivan Kováč; Erik Dosedla; Ján Luczy; František Sabol; Jan Magnus Bjordal Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Tomáš Vasilenko; Ivan Kováč; Martin Slezák; Ján Ďurkáč; Vlasta Peržel'ová; Matúš Čoma; Miriam Kaňuchová; Lukáš Urban; Pavol Szabo; Barbora Dvořánková; Andrej Vrzgula; Robert Zajíček; Karel Smetana; Peter Gál Journal: In Vivo Date: 2022 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Ludmila Dancáková; Tomáš Vasilenko; Ivan Kováč; Katarína Jakubčová; Martin Hollý; Viera Revajová; František Sabol; Zoltán Tomori; Marjolein Iversen; Peter Gál; Jan M Bjordal Journal: Photomed Laser Surg Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Róbert Kilík; Lucia Lakyová; Ján Sabo; Peter Kruzliak; Kamila Lacjaková; Tomáš Vasilenko; Martina Vidová; František Longauer; Jozef Radoňak Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.411