OBJECTIVE:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating, and currently incurable, neuromuscular disease in which oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment are contributing to neuronal loss. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), an antioxidant and mitochondrial cofactor, has shown promise in ALS transgenic mice, and in clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases other than ALS. Our aims were to choose between two high doses of CoQ10 for ALS, and to determine if it merits testing in a Phase III clinical trial. METHODS: We designed and implemented a multicenter trial with an adaptive, two-stage, bias-adjusted, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase II design (n = 185). The primary outcome in both stages was a decline in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRSr) score over 9 months. Stage 1 (dose selection, 35 participants per group) compared CoQ10 doses of 1,800 and 2,700 mg/day. Stage 2 (futility test, 75 patients per group) compared the dose selected in Stage 1 against placebo. RESULTS: Stage 1 selected the 2,700 mg dose. In Stage 2, the pre-specified primary null hypothesis that this dose is superior to placebo was not rejected. It was rejected, however, in an accompanying prespecified sensitivity test, and further supplementary analyses. Prespecified secondary analyses showed no significant differences between CoQ10 at 2,700 mg/day and placebo. There were no safety concerns. INTERPRETATION:CoQ10 at 2,700 mg daily for 9 months shows insufficient promise to warrant Phase III testing. Given this outcome, the adaptive Phase II design incorporating a dose selection and a futility test avoided the need for a much larger conventional Phase III trial.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating, and currently incurable, neuromuscular disease in which oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment are contributing to neuronal loss. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), an antioxidant and mitochondrial cofactor, has shown promise in ALStransgenic mice, and in clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases other than ALS. Our aims were to choose between two high doses of CoQ10 for ALS, and to determine if it merits testing in a Phase III clinical trial. METHODS: We designed and implemented a multicenter trial with an adaptive, two-stage, bias-adjusted, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase II design (n = 185). The primary outcome in both stages was a decline in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRSr) score over 9 months. Stage 1 (dose selection, 35 participants per group) compared CoQ10 doses of 1,800 and 2,700 mg/day. Stage 2 (futility test, 75 patients per group) compared the dose selected in Stage 1 against placebo. RESULTS: Stage 1 selected the 2,700 mg dose. In Stage 2, the pre-specified primary null hypothesis that this dose is superior to placebo was not rejected. It was rejected, however, in an accompanying prespecified sensitivity test, and further supplementary analyses. Prespecified secondary analyses showed no significant differences between CoQ10 at 2,700 mg/day and placebo. There were no safety concerns. INTERPRETATION:CoQ10 at 2,700 mg daily for 9 months shows insufficient promise to warrant Phase III testing. Given this outcome, the adaptive Phase II design incorporating a dose selection and a futility test avoided the need for a much larger conventional Phase III trial.
Authors: Clifford W Shults; David Oakes; Karl Kieburtz; M Flint Beal; Richard Haas; Sandy Plumb; Jorge L Juncos; John Nutt; Ira Shoulson; Julie Carter; Katie Kompoliti; Joel S Perlmutter; Stephen Reich; Matthew Stern; Ray L Watts; Roger Kurlan; Eric Molho; Madaline Harrison; Mark Lew Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2002-10
Authors: Mark R Cookson; Fiona M Menzies; Philip Manning; Christopher J Eggett; Denise A Figlewicz; Calum J McNeil; Pamela J Shaw Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord Date: 2002-06
Authors: Padmaja Yerramilli-Rao; M Flint Beal; Dai Watanabe; Karl Kieburtz; Elisabeth A de Blieck; Mitsuaki Kitano; Kazunori Hosoe; Iwao Funahashi; Merit E Cudkowicz Journal: Int J Toxicol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 2.032
Authors: Wendy R Galpern; Christopher S Coffey; Alberto Albanese; Ken Cheung; Cynthia L Comella; Dixie J Ecklund; Stanley Fahn; Joseph Jankovic; Karl Kieburtz; Anthony E Lang; Michael P McDermott; Jeremy M Shefner; Jan K Teller; John L P Thompson; Sharon D Yeatts; H A Jinnah Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: R G Miller; D H Moore; D A Forshew; J S Katz; R J Barohn; M Valan; M B Bromberg; K L Goslin; M C Graves; L F McCluskey; A L McVey; T Mozaffar; J M Florence; A Pestronk; M Ross; E P Simpson; S H Appel Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christopher S Coffey; Bruce Levin; Christina Clark; Cate Timmerman; Janet Wittes; Peter Gilbert; Sara Harris Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.486