Literature DB >> 19742361

Compliance and self-reported barriers to follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among women utilizing a county mobile mammography van.

Monica E Peek1, Jini H Han.   

Abstract

Our primary objective was to describe the follow-up patterns for abnormal screening mammograms among women in a large urban county who utilized mobile mammography. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using electronic records, medical chart review, and questionnaires. Compliance with diagnostic evaluation was 43% to 60%. Among women who did have follow-up, more than 40% did not do so in a timely fashion. Younger women and those with less suspicious mammograms were more likely to have longer delays. We concluded that programs that utilize mobile mammography should include intensive, multilingual tracking systems in order increase diagnostic follow-up for this vulnerable population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19742361     DOI: 10.1080/07399330903066350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Women Int        ISSN: 0739-9332


  7 in total

1.  Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients.

Authors:  Suzanne S Vang; Alexandra Dunn; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 2.  Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Derek L Nguyen; Emily B Ambinder; Kelly S Myers; Eniola Oluyemi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Peer navigation improves diagnostic follow-up after breast cancer screening among Korean American women: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Angela M Jo; Catherine M Crespi; Madhuri Sudan; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Factors influencing time to diagnosis after abnormal mammography in diverse women.

Authors:  Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Aimee Afable-Munsuz; Celia Patricia Kaplan; Lydia Pace; Cathy Samayoa; Carol Somkin; Dana Nickleach; Marion Lee; Leticia Márquez-Magaña; Teresa Juarbe; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Perspectives of Mobile Versus Fixed Mammography in Santa Clara County, California: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Yi-Ren Chen; Christine Chang-Halpenny; Narmadan A Kumarasamy; Angela Venegas; Clarence H Braddock Iii
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-02-12

6.  Mammography facilities serving vulnerable women have longer follow-up times.

Authors:  Leah S Karliner; Celia Kaplan; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Mobile mammography in underserved populations: analysis of outcomes of 3,923 women.

Authors:  Sandra E Brooks; Tina M Hembree; Brent J Shelton; Sydney C Beache; Greta Aschbacher; Philip H Schervish; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.