PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Solid-phase assays covered with single HLA molecules - such as single-antigen flow-beads (SAFBs) - allow determining the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSAs) 'virtually' by comparison of the HLA-antibody specificities of the recipient with the HLA typing of the donor. In this review, prospects and current limitation of the virtual crossmatch are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Several prospective and retrospective studies indicate that a negative virtual crossmatch is associated with a very low risk of early rejection and good long-term allograft survival. By contrast, a positive virtual crossmatch is associated with a significant risk for early rejection and decreased allograft survival. However, these studies revealed that not all HLA-DSAs detected by SAFB have a detrimental clinical impact. SUMMARY: The virtual crossmatch has emerged as a very useful tool for pretransplant risk assessment and organ allocation. Further advances of the virtual crossmatch approach will require improvements on the technical part of SAFB analysis and a better understanding and definition of pathogenic factors of HLA-DSA. Together with an extended HLA typing of the donor, this scenario will provide us the full benefits of applications based on virtual crossmatching.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Solid-phase assays covered with single HLA molecules - such as single-antigen flow-beads (SAFBs) - allow determining the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSAs) 'virtually' by comparison of the HLA-antibody specificities of the recipient with the HLA typing of the donor. In this review, prospects and current limitation of the virtual crossmatch are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Several prospective and retrospective studies indicate that a negative virtual crossmatch is associated with a very low risk of early rejection and good long-term allograft survival. By contrast, a positive virtual crossmatch is associated with a significant risk for early rejection and decreased allograft survival. However, these studies revealed that not all HLA-DSAs detected by SAFB have a detrimental clinical impact. SUMMARY: The virtual crossmatch has emerged as a very useful tool for pretransplant risk assessment and organ allocation. Further advances of the virtual crossmatch approach will require improvements on the technical part of SAFB analysis and a better understanding and definition of pathogenic factors of HLA-DSA. Together with an extended HLA typing of the donor, this scenario will provide us the full benefits of applications based on virtual crossmatching.
Authors: Brian C Eby; Robert R Redfield; Thomas M Ellis; Glen E Leverson; Abby R Schenian; Jon S Odorico Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ana Navas; Juan Molina; María-Luisa Agüera; Ipek Guler; Aurora Jurado; Alberto Rodríguez-Benot; Corona Alonso; Rafael Solana Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Ana María Arrunátegui; Daniel S Ramón; Luz Marina Viola; Linda G Olsen; Andrés Jaramillo Journal: Biomedica Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 1.173