Literature DB >> 19741413

Creating a nationally representative sample of patients from trauma centers.

Sandra Goble1, Melanie Neal, David E Clark, Avery B Nathens, J Lee Annest, Mark Faul, Richard W Sattin, Lei Li, Paul S Levy, N Clay Mann, Karen Guice, Laura D Cassidy, John J Fildes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was developed as a convenience sample of registry data from contributing trauma centers (TCs), thus, inferences about trauma patients may not be valid at the national level. The NTDB National Sample was created to obtain nationally representative estimates of trauma patients treated in the US level I and II TCs.
METHODS: Level I and II TCs in the Trauma Information Exchange Program were identified and a random stratified sample of 100 TCs was selected. The probability-proportional-to-size method was used to select TCs and sample weights were calculated. National Sample Program estimates from 2003 to 2006 were compared with raw NTDB data, and to a subset of TCs in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a population-based dataset drawn from community hospitals.
RESULTS: Weighted estimates from the NTDB National Sample range from 484,000 (2004) to 608,000 (2006) trauma incidents. Crude NTDB data over-represented the proportion of younger patients (0 years-14 years) compared with the NTDB National Sample, which does not include children's hospitals. Few TCs in Trauma Information Exchange Program are included in Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample, but estimates based on this subset indicate a higher percentage of older patients (age 65 year or older, 23.98% versus 17.85%), lower percentage male patients, and a lower percentage of motor vehicle accidents compared with NTDB National Sample.
CONCLUSION: Although nationally representative data regarding trauma patients are available in other population-based samples, they do not represent TCs patients and lack the specificity of National Sample Program data, which contains detailed information on injury mechanisms, diagnoses, and hospital treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19741413     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b84294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  6 in total

1.  Hospitalized Traumatic Brain Injury: Low Trauma Center Utilization and High Interfacility Transfers among Older Adults.

Authors:  Mark Faul; Likang Xu; Scott M Sasser
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Traumatic injury in the United States: In-patient epidemiology 2000-2011.

Authors:  Charles DiMaggio; Patricia Ayoung-Chee; Matthew Shinseki; Chad Wilson; Gary Marshall; David C Lee; Stephen Wall; Shale Maulana; H Leon Pachter; Spiros Frangos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Traumatic brain injury among older adults at level I and II trauma centers.

Authors:  Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Jeffrey P Cuthbert; John Whyte; John D Corrigan; Mark Faul; Cynthia Harrison-Felix
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Substance P mediates reduced pneumonia rates after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sung Yang; David Stepien; Dennis Hanseman; Bryce Robinson; Michael D Goodman; Timothy A Pritts; Charles C Caldwell; Daniel G Remick; Alex B Lentsch
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Risk factors for cervical spine injury among patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Tomoko Fujii; Mark Faul; Scott Sasser
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2013-10

6.  Incorporating age improves the Glasgow Coma Scale score for predicting mortality from traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kristin Salottolo; Ripul Panchal; Robert M Madayag; Laxmi Dhakal; William Rosenberg; Kaysie L Banton; David Hamilton; David Bar-Or
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.