Literature DB >> 19740776

Socioeconomic determinants for compliance to colorectal cancer screening. A multilevel analysis.

C Pornet1, O Dejardin, F Morlais, V Bouvier, G Launoy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compliance in cancer screening among socially disadvantaged persons is known to be lower than among more socially advantaged persons. However, most of the studies regarding compliance proceed via a questionnaire and are thus limited by self-reported measures of participation and by participation bias. This study aimed at investigating the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on compliance to an organised colorectal cancer screening programme on an unbiased sample based on data from the entire target population within a French geographical department, Calvados (n=180 045).
METHODS: Individual data of participation and aggregate socioeconomic data, from the structure responsible for organising screening and the French census, respectively, were analysed simultaneously by a multilevel model.
RESULTS: Uptake was significantly higher in women than in men (OR=1.33; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.45), and significantly lower in the youngest (50-59 years) and in the oldest (70-74 years) persons, compared with intermediate ages (60-69 years), with OR=0.70 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.77) and OR=0.82 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), respectively. Uptake fell with increasing level of deprivation. There was a significant difference of uptake probability between the least deprived and the most deprived areas (OR=0.68; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.79). No significant influence of the general practitioners density was found.
CONCLUSION: Multilevel analysis allowed to detect areas of weak uptake linked to areas of strong deprivation. These results suggest that targeting populations with a risk of low compliance, as identified both socially and geographically in our study, could be adopted to minimise inequalities in screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19740776     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.081117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  35 in total

1.  Sociodemographic predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ulrik Deding; Anna Sharon Henig; Ann Salling; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Henrik Bøggild
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Effect of Physician Notification Regarding Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening on Patient Participation in Fecal Immunochemical Test Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Corinne Pogu; Delphine Le Donné; Chloé Latour; Gaelle Bianco; France Nanin; Anne Cowppli-Bony; Aurélie Gaultier; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Spatiotemporal association between deprivation and mortality: trends in France during the nineties.

Authors:  Fanny Windenberger; Stéphane Rican; Eric Jougla; Grégoire Rey
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  B L Frederiksen; T Jørgensen; K Brasso; I Holten; M Osler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Do socially deprived urban areas have lesser supplies of cancer care services?

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Yulei He; S V Subramanian; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Recent relocation and decreased survival following a cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Vinayak Muralidhar; Paul L Nguyen; Reginald D Tucker-Seeley
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Multilevel predictors of colorectal cancer screening use in California.

Authors:  Salma Shariff-Marco; Nancy Breen; David G Stinchcomb; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  A longitudinal study of non-medical determinants of adherence to R-CHOP therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: implication for survival.

Authors:  Cécile Borel; Sébastien Lamy; Gisèle Compaci; Christian Récher; Pauline Jeanneau; Jean Claude Nogaro; Eric Bauvin; Fabien Despas; Cyrille Delpierre; Guy Laurent
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Regional factors associated with participation in the national health screening program: a multilevel analysis using national data.

Authors:  Hyung-Kook Yang; Dong-Wook Shin; Seung-Sik Hwang; Juwhan Oh; Be-Long Cho
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.