Mingguo Qiu1, Qiyu Li, Guangjiu Liu, Bing Xie, Jiang Wang. 1. Department of Medical Informatics and Medical Image, College of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China. qiumingguo@yahoo.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in age-related brain white matter by voxel-based analysis of healthy adolescents and young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Echo-planar diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed in healthy subjects of 3 groups (aged 11-13, 16-18 and 23-25, respectively). Linear correlative analyses were applied to determining age-related fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), and t-test was performed to compare FA and mean diffusion maps between different age groups. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation of FA with age was found in the internal capsule, the external capsule, the frontal white matter, and the body and genu of the corpus callosum. Compared with the 11-13 age group, FA in the 16-18 age group increased in the internal capsule, the frontal white matter, the body and the splenium of the corpus callosum. Compared to the 16-18 age group, FA in the 23-25 age group increased in the frontal white matter, the posterior limb of internal capsule, and the genu of the corpus callosum. Statistically significant negative correlation of the mean diffusion with age was found in the frontal and parietal white matter. Compared with the 11-13 age group, MD in the 16-18 age group decreased in the prefrontal and the temporo-parietal white matter. Compared with the 16-18 age group, MD in the 23-25 age group decreased in the frontal white matter. CONCLUSION: Diffusion-tensor MR imaging results indicate that white matter maturation assessed at different ages involves increases in FA and decreases in mean diffusion of the white matter during adolescence and young adulthood. FA and mean diffusion may reflect different physiologic processes in healthy adolescents and young adults. Taken together, these data show that maturation of white matter is an important part of brain maturation during adolescence and young adulthood. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in age-related brain white matter by voxel-based analysis of healthy adolescents and young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Echo-planar diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed in healthy subjects of 3 groups (aged 11-13, 16-18 and 23-25, respectively). Linear correlative analyses were applied to determining age-related fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), and t-test was performed to compare FA and mean diffusion maps between different age groups. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation of FA with age was found in the internal capsule, the external capsule, the frontal white matter, and the body and genu of the corpus callosum. Compared with the 11-13 age group, FA in the 16-18 age group increased in the internal capsule, the frontal white matter, the body and the splenium of the corpus callosum. Compared to the 16-18 age group, FA in the 23-25 age group increased in the frontal white matter, the posterior limb of internal capsule, and the genu of the corpus callosum. Statistically significant negative correlation of the mean diffusion with age was found in the frontal and parietal white matter. Compared with the 11-13 age group, MD in the 16-18 age group decreased in the prefrontal and the temporo-parietal white matter. Compared with the 16-18 age group, MD in the 23-25 age group decreased in the frontal white matter. CONCLUSION: Diffusion-tensor MR imaging results indicate that white matter maturation assessed at different ages involves increases in FA and decreases in mean diffusion of the white matter during adolescence and young adulthood. FA and mean diffusion may reflect different physiologic processes in healthy adolescents and young adults. Taken together, these data show that maturation of white matter is an important part of brain maturation during adolescence and young adulthood. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Hae Min Jo; Hee Kyung Cho; Sung Ho Jang; Sang Seok Yeo; Eunsil Lee; Han Sun Kim; Su Min Son Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2012-05-06 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Chi T Ngo; Kylie H Alm; Athanasia Metoki; William Hampton; Tracy Riggins; Nora S Newcombe; Ingrid R Olson Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 6.464
Authors: Jun Wang; Jamie Barstein; Lauren E Ethridge; Matthew W Mosconi; Yukari Takarae; John A Sweeney Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Ian Ellison-Wright; Pradeep J Nathan; Edward T Bullmore; Rashid Zaman; Robert B Dudas; Mark Agius; Emilio Fernandez-Egea; Ulrich Müller; Chris M Dodds; Natalie J Forde; Cathy Scanlon; Alexander Leemans; Colm McDonald; Dara M Cannon Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 3.630