Literature DB >> 1974051

Structural and functional comparisons of the Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster rough genes.

U Heberlein1, G M Rubin.   

Abstract

We have isolated the homeobox gene rough (ro) from Drosophila virilis. Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequences of the D. melanogaster and D. virilis rough proteins reveals that domains of high conservation, including the homeodomain, are interspersed with highly diverged regions. Stretches of significant sequence conservation are also observed in the 5' promoter region and in the introns. The D. virilis rough gene rescues the rough mutant phenotype and is properly regulated when introduced into the D. melanogaster genome. Thus the rough protein as well as the cis-regulatory elements that ensure proper temporal and spatial regulation are functionally conserved between these Drosophila species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1974051      PMCID: PMC54440          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  The homeo domain protein rough is expressed in a subset of cells in the developing Drosophila eye where it can specify photoreceptor cell subtype.

Authors:  B E Kimmel; U Heberlein; G M Rubin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  opa: a novel family of transcribed repeats shared by the Notch locus and other developmentally regulated loci in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  K A Wharton; B Yedvobnick; V G Finnerty; S Artavanis-Tsakonas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Evolutionary conservation of homeodomain-binding sites and other sequences upstream and within the major transcription unit of the Drosophila segmentation gene engrailed.

Authors:  J A Kassis; C Desplan; D K Wright; P H O'Farrell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Regulation of the complex pattern of sevenless expression in the developing Drosophila eye.

Authors:  D D Bowtell; B E Kimmel; M A Simon; G M Rubin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of the consensus sequence flanking translational start sites in Drosophila and vertebrates.

Authors:  D R Cavener
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Transposition of cloned P elements into Drosophila germ line chromosomes.

Authors:  A C Spradling; G M Rubin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Lambda replacement vectors carrying polylinker sequences.

Authors:  A M Frischauf; H Lehrach; A Poustka; N Murray
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation.

Authors:  D Tautz; M Trick; G A Dover
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Aug 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Conserved arrangement of nested genes at the Drosophila Gart locus.

Authors:  S Henikoff; M K Eghtedarzadeh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change.

Authors:  M Treier; C Pfeifle; D Tautz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  18 in total

1.  New nucleotide sequence data on the EMBL File Server.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The cytoskeletal regulator Genghis khan is required for columnar target specificity in the Drosophila visual system.

Authors:  Allison C Gontang; Jennifer J Hwa; Joshua D Mast; Tina Schwabe; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Cloning and analysis of the mobile element gypsy from D. virilis.

Authors:  L J Mizrokhi; A M Mazo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The role of evolutionarily conserved sequences in alternative splicing at the 3' end of Drosophila melanogaster myosin heavy chain RNA.

Authors:  D Hodges; R M Cripps; M E O'Connor; S I Bernstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Molecular characterization of the zerknüllt region of the Antennapedia complex of D. subobscura.

Authors:  J Terol; M Perez-Alonso; R de Frutos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  A combined molecular and cytogenetic approach to genome evolution in Drosophila using large-fragment DNA cloning.

Authors:  E R Lozovskaya; D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Comparative studies of Drosophila Antennapedia genes.

Authors:  J E Hooper; M Pérez-Alonso; J R Bermingham; M Prout; B A Rocklein; M Wagenbach; J E Edstrom; R de Frutos; M P Scott
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Organizational analysis of elav gene and functional analysis of ELAV protein of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  K M Yao; K White
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Enhancer of rudimentaryp1, e(r)p1, a highly conserved enhancer of the rudimentary gene.

Authors:  E Wojcik; A M Murphy; H Fares; K Dang-Vu; S I Tsubota
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Sequence evolution of the Gpdh gene in the Drosophila virilis species group.

Authors:  H Tominaga; S Narise
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.