Literature DB >> 19740070

Multisegmental foot modeling: a review.

Leah Rankine1, Jason Long, Karl Canseco, Gerald F Harris.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, a number of multisegmental foot models have been developed in order to characterize foot kinematics. This paper reviews methods of multisegmental foot modeling, technical elements of the models, select clinical applications of the models, and future directions in this area of research. Technical areas discussed include angular derotation mechanisms and capture technology. Models discussed address two-, three-, four-, five-, and nine-segment approaches. Additional models which address foot segments using other definitions, are also discussed. Clinical applications of multisegmental foot models include pathologic gait characterization in rheumatoid arthritis, posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, and hallux rigidus. Areas of continued development, including soft tissue artifact and nomenclature, are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19740070     DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v36.i2-3.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0278-940X


  6 in total

1.  The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.

Authors:  Marjolein M van der Krogt; Jaap Harlaar; Wouter Schallig; Josien C van den Noort; Marjolein Piening; Geert J Streekstra; Mario Maas
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sang Gyo Seo; Dong Yeon Lee; Hyuk Ju Moon; Sung Ju Kim; Jihyeung Kim; Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Understanding the foot's functional anatomy in physiological and pathological conditions: the calcaneopedal unit concept.

Authors:  I Ghanem; A Massaad; A Assi; M Rizkallah; A J Bizdikian; R El Abiad; R Seringe; V Mosca; P Wicart
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Agreement between An Inertia and Optical Based Motion Capture during the VU-Return-to-Play- Field-Test.

Authors:  Chris Richter; Katherine A J Daniels; Enda King; Andrew Franklyn-Miller
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Biomechanics of the natural, arthritic, and replaced human ankle joint.

Authors:  Alberto Leardini; John J O'Connor; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  The Reliability of Foot and Ankle Bone and Joint Kinematics Measured With Biplanar Videoradiography and Manual Scientific Rotoscoping.

Authors:  Jayishni N Maharaj; Sarah Kessler; Michael J Rainbow; Susan E D'Andrea; Nicolai Konow; Luke A Kelly; Glen A Lichtwark
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.