Literature DB >> 19738261

Measurement of and reward for efficiency In California's pay-for-performance program.

James C Robinson1, Thomas Williams, Dolores Yanagihara.   

Abstract

Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are expanding their purview from quality to include efficiency, and many consider the episode of care as the appropriate unit of measurement. Two years' experience by the California P4P program, however, reveals that the requisite claims data often are incomplete or poorly coded and that even large physician groups have too few patients experiencing most types of episodes to permit statistically valid measurement for public reporting and incentive payment. The California P4P program is shifting its efficiency focus to metrics not reliant on episode measurement while shifting episode measurement to supporting bundled payment for acute surgical and medical interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19738261     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  8 in total

1.  Organizational complements to electronic health records in ambulatory physician performance: the role of support staff.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

3.  Cost profiles: should the focus be on individual physicians or physician groups?

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; John L Adams; J William Thomas; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Urologist compliance with AUA best practice guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Medicare population.

Authors:  Seth A Strope; Sean P Elliott; Christopher S Saigal; Alex Smith; Timothy J Wilt; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Designing an effective pay-for-performance system in the Korean National Health Insurance.

Authors:  Hyoung-Sun Jeong
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-05-31

Review 6.  Challenges and opportunities in measuring the quality of mental health care.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Donna Keyser; Harold Alan Pincus
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.356

7.  Risk adjustment for health care financing in chronic disease: what are we missing by failing to account for disease severity?

Authors:  Theodore A Omachi; Steven E Gregorich; Mark D Eisner; Renee A Penaloza; Irina V Tolstykh; Edward H Yelin; Carlos Iribarren; R Adams Dudley; Paul D Blanc
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The use of outcome and process indicators to incentivize integrated care for frail older people: a case study of primary care services in Sweden.

Authors:  Anders Anell; Anna H Glenngård
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 5.120

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.