PURPOSE: This single-center, open-label, phase II trial evaluated the bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), and dexamethasone combination regimen (VDD) as initial treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled patients (N = 40) received up to six 3-week cycles of treatment with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; PLD 30 mg/m(2) IV on day 4; and dexamethasone 20 to 40 mg daily as specified in the study design. The primary end point was the complete/near-complete response (CR/nCR) rate after six cycles. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The impact of VDD on stem-cell mobilization and collection also was evaluated. RESULTS: After six cycles, the ORR was 85.0% (CR/nCR, 37.5%; very good partial response [VGPR] or better, 57.5%). Patients who underwent stem-cell transplantation (SCT) after VDD (n = 30) experienced increased rates of VGPR or better (53.3% to 76.6% after SCT). Overall, 1-year PFS and OS rates were 92.5% and 97.5%, respectively. Those who achieved VGPR or better after treatment with VDD showed a significantly greater 1-year PFS versus those who achieved less than VGPR (100% v 82%, respectively; P = .03). Similar results were observed in patients who underwent SCT. Grades 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities occurred in < or = 10% of patients; grade 2 painful neuropathy occurred in 7.5%; and grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred in 2.5%. CONCLUSION: VDD is highly effective for initial treatment of MM followed by SCT in appropriate patients, and it has a reasonable safety profile. Achievement of VGPR or better with this initial therapy predicted longer PFS, regardless of the consolidation therapy given.
PURPOSE: This single-center, open-label, phase II trial evaluated the bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), and dexamethasone combination regimen (VDD) as initial treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled patients (N = 40) received up to six 3-week cycles of treatment with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; PLD 30 mg/m(2) IV on day 4; and dexamethasone 20 to 40 mg daily as specified in the study design. The primary end point was the complete/near-complete response (CR/nCR) rate after six cycles. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The impact of VDD on stem-cell mobilization and collection also was evaluated. RESULTS: After six cycles, the ORR was 85.0% (CR/nCR, 37.5%; very good partial response [VGPR] or better, 57.5%). Patients who underwent stem-cell transplantation (SCT) after VDD (n = 30) experienced increased rates of VGPR or better (53.3% to 76.6% after SCT). Overall, 1-year PFS and OS rates were 92.5% and 97.5%, respectively. Those who achieved VGPR or better after treatment with VDD showed a significantly greater 1-year PFS versus those who achieved less than VGPR (100% v 82%, respectively; P = .03). Similar results were observed in patients who underwent SCT. Grades 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities occurred in < or = 10% of patients; grade 2 painful neuropathy occurred in 7.5%; and grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred in 2.5%. CONCLUSION: VDD is highly effective for initial treatment of MM followed by SCT in appropriate patients, and it has a reasonable safety profile. Achievement of VGPR or better with this initial therapy predicted longer PFS, regardless of the consolidation therapy given.
Authors: Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Dominik Dytfeld; Kent A Griffith; Daniel Lebovic; David H Vesole; Sundar Jagannath; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Tara Anderson; Brian Nordgren; Kristen Detweiler-Short; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Asra Ahmed; Terri Jobkar; Diane E Durecki; Kathryn McDonnell; Melissa Mietzel; Daniel Couriel; Mark Kaminski; Ravi Vij Journal: Blood Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Philippe Moreau; Paul G Richardson; Michele Cavo; Robert Z Orlowski; Jesús F San Miguel; Antonio Palumbo; Jean-Luc Harousseau Journal: Blood Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Joel G Turner; Jana Dawson; Christopher L Cubitt; Rachid Baz; Daniel M Sullivan Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Michele Cavo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Antonio Palumbo; Philippe Moreau; Robert Orlowski; Joan Bladé; Orhan Sezer; Heinz Ludwig; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Michel Attal; Pieter Sonneveld; Mario Boccadoro; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson; William Bensinger; Hans E Johnsen; Nicolaus Kroeger; Gösta Gahrton; P Leif Bergsagel; David H Vesole; Hermann Einsele; Sundar Jagannath; Ruben Niesvizky; Brian G M Durie; Jesus San Miguel; Sagar Lonial Journal: Blood Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Alejandro A Hidalgo; Kristin K Deeb; J Wesley Pike; Candace S Johnson; Donald L Trump Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Robert Z Orlowski; Arnon Nagler; Pieter Sonneveld; Joan Bladé; Roman Hajek; Andrew Spencer; Tadeusz Robak; Anna Dmoszynska; Noemi Horvath; Ivan Spicka; Heather J Sutherland; Alexander N Suvorov; Liang Xiu; Andrew Cakana; Trilok Parekh; Jesús F San-Miguel Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 6.860