Literature DB >> 19738126

Amphiregulin and epiregulin mRNA expression in primary tumors predicts outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Bart Jacobs1, Wendy De Roock, Hubert Piessevaux, Robin Van Oirbeek, Bart Biesmans, Jef De Schutter, Steffen Fieuws, Jo Vandesompele, Marc Peeters, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Yves Humblet, Frederique Pénault-Llorca, Gert De Hertogh, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Eric Van Cutsem, Sabine Tejpar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the power of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) epiregulin (EREG) and amphiregulin (AREG) ligands' expression in primary tumors to predict the outcome in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (cmCRC) treated with the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gene expression measurements and KRAS mutation analysis were performed on archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumors of 220 cmCRC patients. Response was measured using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. The relation between ligand expression levels and outcome was evaluated using logistic regression for response and Cox regression for survival data. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed for response and survival data. CIs for the performance indices were obtained with a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. Findings were externally validated on a series of 67 samples treated in a similar setting.
RESULTS: In KRAS wild type (WT) patients, there was a significant association between log-transformed ligand expression and response for EREG (odds ratio for objective response, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.83; P = .0005; concordance index [c-index], 0.681) and for AREG (odds ratio for objective response, 1.862; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.72; P = .0017; c-index, 0.673). In a Cox regression model, dichotomized ligand expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). EREG PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.274 to 0.609; P < .001; time-dependent c-index [Ctau index], 0.640), and AREG PFS HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.64; P < .001; Ctau index, 0.627). EREG OS HR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.63; P < .0001; Ctau index, 0.639), and AREG OS HR was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.64; P < .0001; Ctau index, 0.625). There was no predictive power of ligand expression in patients with KRAS mutation.
CONCLUSION: Expression of EGFR ligands in primary tumors significantly predicts outcome in KRAS WT cmCRC treated with cetuximab and irinotecan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19738126     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  130 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Development of an integrated genomic classifier for a novel agent in colorectal cancer: approach to individualized therapy in early development.

Authors:  Todd M Pitts; Aik Choon Tan; Gillian N Kulikowski; John J Tentler; Amy M Brown; Sara A Flanigan; Stephen Leong; Christopher D Coldren; Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Christopher Korch; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Autocrine epidermal growth factor receptor ligand production and cetuximab response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Goro Oshima; Johan Wennerberg; Takashi Yamatodani; Elisabeth Kjellén; Hiroyuki Mineta; Anders Johnsson; Lars Ekblad
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  B Markman; V Rodríguez-Freixinos; J Tabernero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Understanding resistance to EGFR inhibitors-impact on future treatment strategies.

Authors:  Deric L Wheeler; Emily F Dunn; Paul M Harari
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Colorectal Cancer: Why Does Side Matter?

Authors:  Claire Gallois; Simon Pernot; Aziz Zaanan; Julien Taieb
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  A novel predictive strategy by immunohistochemical analysis of four EGFR ligands in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR antibodies.

Authors:  Michihiro Yoshida; Takaya Shimura; Mikinori Sato; Masahide Ebi; Takahiro Nakazawa; Hiromitsu Takeyama; Takashi Joh
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor ligands in polarized epithelial cells.

Authors:  Bhuminder Singh; Robert J Coffey
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 19.318

9.  Accomplishments in 2008 in biologic markers for gastrointestinal cancers-focus on colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sabine Tejpar; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

Review 10.  [Pathological diagnosis for individualized therapy of colorectal cancer].

Authors:  T Kirchner; A Jung
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.