PURPOSE: A randomized trial of oblimersen plus fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (OBL-FC; n = 120) versus FC (n = 121) was conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The primary end point was met: the complete response (CR) rate, defined as complete or nodular partial response, was significantly greater with OBL-FC than with FC (17% v 7%; P = .025). Among patients with CR, response duration was significantly longer with OBL-FC than with FC (median not reached; > 36 months v 22 months; P = .03). Maximum benefit with OBL-FC, including a four-fold increase in CR rate and a survival benefit with 3 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.53; P = .05), was observed in patients with fludarabine-sensitive disease. We evaluated long-term survival and poststudy CLL therapy among all randomly assigned patients. METHODS: Poststudy CLL treatment information was collected. Patients were observed for survival for up to 5 years from the date of random assignment. RESULTS: Poststudy CLL treatment was balanced between arms. Intent-to-treat analysis of 5-year survival showed no significant between-treatment difference (hazard ratio, 0.87; P = .34). Among the greater than 40% of patients with complete or partial remission, a significant 5-year survival benefit was observed with OBL-FC (hazard ratio, 0.60; P = .038). Among patients with fludarabine-sensitive disease who had previously demonstrated maximum benefit with OBL-FC, the previously observed survival benefit improved: a 50% reduction in the risk of death was observed (P = .004). CONCLUSION: In relapsed/refractory CLL, OBL combined with FC offers patients who achieve complete or partial remission, as well as those who have fludarabine-sensitive disease, a significant survival benefit.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: A randomized trial of oblimersen plus fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (OBL-FC; n = 120) versus FC (n = 121) was conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The primary end point was met: the complete response (CR) rate, defined as complete or nodular partial response, was significantly greater with OBL-FC than with FC (17% v 7%; P = .025). Among patients with CR, response duration was significantly longer with OBL-FC than with FC (median not reached; > 36 months v 22 months; P = .03). Maximum benefit with OBL-FC, including a four-fold increase in CR rate and a survival benefit with 3 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.53; P = .05), was observed in patients with fludarabine-sensitive disease. We evaluated long-term survival and poststudy CLL therapy among all randomly assigned patients. METHODS: Poststudy CLL treatment information was collected. Patients were observed for survival for up to 5 years from the date of random assignment. RESULTS: Poststudy CLL treatment was balanced between arms. Intent-to-treat analysis of 5-year survival showed no significant between-treatment difference (hazard ratio, 0.87; P = .34). Among the greater than 40% of patients with complete or partial remission, a significant 5-year survival benefit was observed with OBL-FC (hazard ratio, 0.60; P = .038). Among patients with fludarabine-sensitive disease who had previously demonstrated maximum benefit with OBL-FC, the previously observed survival benefit improved: a 50% reduction in the risk of death was observed (P = .004). CONCLUSION: In relapsed/refractory CLL, OBL combined with FC offers patients who achieve complete or partial remission, as well as those who have fludarabine-sensitive disease, a significant survival benefit.
Authors: Susan M O'Brien; Charles C Cunningham; Anatoliy K Golenkov; Anna G Turkina; Steven C Novick; Kanti R Rai Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael J Keating; Ian Flinn; Vinay Jain; Jacques-Louis Binet; Peter Hillmen; John Byrd; Maher Albitar; Lee Brettman; Pedro Santabarbara; Bret Wacker; Kanti R Rai Journal: Blood Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: K R Rai; B L Peterson; F R Appelbaum; J Kolitz; L Elias; L Shepherd; J Hines; G A Threatte; R A Larson; B D Cheson; C A Schiffer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Faderl; M J Keating; K-A Do; S-Y Liang; H M Kantarjian; S O'Brien; G Garcia-Manero; T Manshouri; M Albitar Journal: Leukemia Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Susan O'Brien; Joseph O Moore; Thomas E Boyd; Loree M Larratt; Aleksander Skotnicki; Benjamin Koziner; Asher A Chanan-Khan; John F Seymour; R Gregory Bociek; Steve Pavletic; Kanti R Rai Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jules P P Meijerink; Esther M M Van Lieshout; H Berna Beverloo; Ellen Van Drunen; Ewald J B M Mensink; Merryn Macville; Rob Pieters Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Barbara Pro; Brian Leber; Mitchell Smith; Luis Fayad; Jorge Romaguera; Fredrick Hagemeister; Alma Rodriguez; Peter McLaughlin; Felipe Samaniego; James Zwiebel; Adriana Lopez; Larry Kwak; Anas Younes Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: John C Byrd; Bercedis L Peterson; Vicki A Morrison; Kathleen Park; Robert Jacobson; Eva Hoke; James W Vardiman; Kanti Rai; Charles A Schiffer; Richard A Larson Journal: Blood Date: 2002-07-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: D Catovsky; S Richards; E Matutes; D Oscier; Mjs Dyer; R F Bezares; A R Pettitt; T Hamblin; D W Milligan; J A Child; M S Hamilton; C E Dearden; A G Smith; A G Bosanquet; Z Davis; V Brito-Babapulle; M Else; R Wade; P Hillmen Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tetyana V Bagnyukova; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Yan Zhou; Elizabeth A Hopper-Borge; Erica A Golemis; Igor Astsaturov Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 4.742