Literature DB >> 19737765

Evaluation of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs.

Jennifer R Schissler1, Andrew Hillier, Joshua B Daniels, Lynette K Cole, Wondwossen A Gebreyes.   

Abstract

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute published in 2008 new interpretive criteria for the identification of methicillin resistance in staphylococci isolated from animals. The sensitivity of the 2008 interpretive criteria for mecA gene-positive Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, compared with the previous criteria of 2004, was investigated. Thirty clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius from dogs were used. The presence of the mecA gene was determined by polymerase chain reaction. The minimum inhibitory concentration for oxacillin was determined by broth microdilution. The 2008 breakpoint of >or=4 microg/ml for methicillin resistance resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 73.3% (22/30). The 2004 breakpoint guideline of >or=0.5 microg/ml resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 97% (29/30). For oxacillin disk diffusion, the 2008 interpretive criterion of <or=10 mm for methicillin resistance resulted in a sensitivity of 70% (21/30). If intermediate isolates (11 or 12 mm) were considered resistant, the sensitivity was 93% (28/30). If intermediate isolates (11 or 12 mm) were considered resistant, the sensitivity was 93% (28/30). Application of the 2004 interpretive criterion of <or=17 mm resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% (30/30). For cefoxitin disk diffusion, the interpretive criterion of <or=21 mm for methicillin resistance (as used for Staphylococcus aureus) resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 6.7% (2/30). The interpretive criterion of <or=24 mm (as used for coagulase-negative staphylococci) resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 43.3% (13/30). With the use of 2008 interpretive criteria, all 3 tests produced what we consider to be an unacceptable level of false negative results. Our findings also suggest that cefoxitin disk diffusion is an inappropriate screening test for methicillin resistance of canine S. pseudintermedius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19737765     DOI: 10.1177/104063870902100514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  12 in total

1.  Staphylococcus hyicus bacteremia in a farmer.

Authors:  Carlo Casanova; Lukas Iselin; Niklaus von Steiger; Sara Droz; Parham Sendi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Carriage of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Colony of Rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and Cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) Macaques.

Authors:  Abigail W Greenstein; Susan Boyle-Vavra; Carol W Maddox; Xiwei Tang; Lisa C Halliday; Jeffrey D Fortman
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Genotypic and phenotypic profiles of Escherichia coli isolates belonging to clinical sequence type 131 (ST131), clinical non-ST131, and fecal non-ST131 lineages from India.

Authors:  Arif Hussain; Amit Ranjan; Nishant Nandanwar; Anshu Babbar; Savita Jadhav; Niyaz Ahmed
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk and MIC Breakpoints for Prediction of Methicillin Resistance in Human and Veterinary Isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius Group.

Authors:  M T Wu; C-A D Burnham; L F Westblade; J Dien Bard; S D Lawhon; M A Wallace; T Stanley; E Burd; J Hindler; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Amikacin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs.

Authors:  R M Gold; N D Cohen; S D Lawhon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ulrika Windahl; Elin Reimegård; Bodil Ström Holst; Agneta Egenvall; Liselotte Fernström; Mona Fredriksson; Gunilla Trowald-Wigh; Ulrika Grönlund Andersson
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Prevalence, species distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in Lithuanian pet animals.

Authors:  Modestas Ruzauskas; Natacha Couto; Sigita Kerziene; Rita Siugzdiniene; Irena Klimiene; Marius Virgailis; Constança Pomba
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Risk of Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistant Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Free-Range Retail Chicken in India.

Authors:  Arif Hussain; Sabiha Shaik; Amit Ranjan; Nishant Nandanwar; Sumeet K Tiwari; Mohammad Majid; Ramani Baddam; Insaf A Qureshi; Torsten Semmler; Lothar H Wieler; Mohammad A Islam; Dipshikha Chakravortty; Niyaz Ahmed
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Characterization of agr Groups of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Isolates from Dogs in Texas.

Authors:  Sara V Little; Laura K Bryan; Andrew E Hillhouse; Noah D Cohen; Sara D Lawhon
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.389

10.  Comparison of cefoxitin disk diffusion test and mecA gene PCR results for methicillin resistance detection in Staphylococcus intermedius group isolates from canine origin in Brazil.

Authors:  Bruno Penna; Renata F Rabello; Walter Lilenbaum
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.