Literature DB >> 19737507

Effects of growth conditions on biofilm formation by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Josée Labrie1, Geneviève Pelletier-Jacques, Vincent Deslandes, Mahendrasingh Ramjeet, Eliane Auger, John H E Nash, Mario Jacques.   

Abstract

Biofilm formation is an important virulence trait of many bacterial pathogens. It has been reported in the literature that only two of the reference strains of the swine pathogen Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, representing serotypes 5b and 11, were able to form biofilm in vitro. In this study, we compared biofilm formation by the serotype 1 reference strain S4074 of A. pleuropneumoniae grown in five different culture media. We observed that strain S4074 of A. pleuropneumoniae is able to form biofilms after growth in one of the culture conditions tested brain heart infusion (BHI medium, supplier B). Confocal laser scanning microscopy using a fluorescent probe specific to the poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PGA) polysaccharide further confirmed biofilm formation. In accordance, biofilm formation was susceptible to dispersin B, a PGA hydrolase. Transcriptional profiles of A. pleuropneumoniae S4074 following growth in BHI-B, which allowed a robust biofilm formation, and in BHI-A, in which only a slight biofilm formation was observed, were compared. Genes such as tadC, tadD, genes with homology to autotransporter adhesins as well as genes pgaABC involved in PGA biosynthesis and genes involved in zinc transport were up-regulated after growth in BHI-B. Interestingly, biofilm formation was inhibited by zinc, which was found to be more present in BHI-A (no or slight biofilm) than in BHI-B. We also observed biofilm formation in reference strains representing serotypes 3, 4, 5a, 12 and 14 as well as in 20 of the 37 fresh field isolates tested. Our data indicate that A. pleuropneumoniae has the ability to form biofilms under appropriate growth conditions and transition from a biofilm-positive to a biofilm-negative phenotype was reversible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19737507      PMCID: PMC2762130          DOI: 10.1051/vetres/2009051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


INTRODUCTION

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, a member of the Pasteurellaceae, is an important swine pathogen responsible for economic losses in the swine industry. To date, 15 serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae have been described based on capsular antigens [3, 10]. The virulence of the bacteria is mediated by the coordinated action of several virulence factors, namely the capsule, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), Apx toxins and outer membrane proteins involved in iron uptake [4, 11, 14, 18, 19, 28, 29]. It is widely accepted that the majority of bacteria in virtually all ecosystems (natural, engineered and pathogenic ecosystems) grow in matrix-enclosed biofilms [7]. The matrix provides biofilm cells with a protected microenvironment containing nutrients, secreted enzymes and DNA. The matrix also contributes to the increased resistance to antibiotics and host defenses exhibited by biofilm cells [15]. All members of the Pasteurellaceae are inhabitants of mucosal surfaces of mammals and therefore formation of a biofilm may be crucial to their persistence in vivo. However, biofilms have only been investigated in a few species of the Pasteurellaceae family [16]. In A. pleuropneumoniae, the formation of biofilms on polystyrene microtiter plate is dependent on the production of poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PGA) a linear polymer of N-acetylglucosamine residues in β(1,6) linkage [17, 20]. The production of PGA is encoded by the genes pgaABCD [20]. A novel insertion element, ISApl1, was recently identified in an A/T rich region of the pgaC gene of the biofilm-negative A. pleuropneumoniae strain HB04 [25]. PGA is a substrate for dispersin B (DspB), a biofilm-releasing glycosyl hydrolase produced by Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans and A. pleuropneumoniae [20, 22]. It has also been reported that only 2 of the 15 A. pleuropneumoniae reference strains, representing serotypes 5b and 11, were able to form a biofilm in vitro and that the transition from a biofilm-positive to biofilm-negative phenotype was irreversible [21]. However, Li et al. [24] recently observed slight biomass of biofilm when the A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 reference strain S4074 was grown in serum-free TSB but not in serum-containing TSB. In addition, an enhanced biofilm formation was observed in luxS [24] and hns [8] mutants of A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074. The aims of the present study were: (i) to re-evaluate biofilm formation by A. pleuropneumoniae reference strain S4074 (serotype 1) under different growth conditions using a standard microtiter plate and crystal violet staining protocol; (ii) to evaluate the ability of 16 reference strains and 37 fresh field isolates to form biofilm in the growth condition shown to allow the best biofilm formation and (iii) to determine the transcriptomic profile of A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074 when grown in that culture condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Bacterial strains used in the present study are listed in Table I. Bacteria were grown on brain heart infusion agar plates (BHI; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) supplemented with 15 μg/mL nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). A colony was transferred into 5 mL of Luria-Bertani broth (LB; Difco), tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco), Mueller Hinton broth (MH; Difco) or BHI (BHI-A; Difco or BHI-B; Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) with 5 μg/mL NAD and incubated at 37 °C overnight with agitation. This culture was used for the biofilm assays.
Table I.

A. pleuropneumoniae strains used in the present study.

StrainsRelevant traitsSource
Reference strains
S4074Serotype 1K.R. Mittal1
4226Serotype 2K.R. Mittal1
1421Serotype 3K.R. Mittal1
1462Serotype 4K.R. Mittal1
K17Serotype 5aK.R. Mittal1
L20Serotype 5bK.R. Mittal1
FEMOSerotype 6K.R. Mittal1
WF.83Serotype 7K.R. Mittal1
405Serotype 8K.R. Mittal1
13261Serotype 9K.R. Mittal1
13039Serotype 10K.R. Mittal1
56153Serotype 11K.R. Mittal1
832985Serotype 12K.R. Mittal1
N2734Serotype 13M. Gottschalk1
39064Serotype 14M. Gottschalk1
HS143Serotype 15M. Gottschalk1
Field strains
05-7430, 05-7431Serotype 1M. Ngeleka2
111A, 719, 2398, 2521Serotype 1D. Slavic3
05-4817, 05-C996, 06-996Serotype 5aS. Messier1
04-37943, 04-3128, 05-508Serotype 5aM. Ngeleka2
05-6501, 06-4091Serotype 5bS. Messier1
03-14796, 03-22382, 03-22383, 05-4832Serotype 5bM. Ngeleka2
366A, 400, 564D, 888Serotype 5bD. Slavic3
05-3695, 06-3008, 06-3060, 06-4108Serotype 7S. Messier1
04-37257, 05-14401Serotype 7M. Ngeleka2
881, 986, 1951, 4648Serotype 7D. Slavic3
05-13146, 05-14657, 05-20080, 05-20081, 05-2983Serotype 15M. Ngeleka2

Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

Prairie Diagnostic Services, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

These strains are NAD-independent and belong to biotype II.

A. pleuropneumoniae strains used in the present study. Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada. Prairie Diagnostic Services, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. These strains are NAD-independent and belong to biotype II.

Biofilm assay in microtiter plates

The microtiter plate biofilm assay is a static assay particularly useful for examining early events in biofilm formation [27]. The wells of a sterile 96-well microtiter plate (Costar® 3599, Corning, NY, USA) were filled in triplicate with a dilution (1/100) of an overnight bacterial culture. Following an incubation of 6 or 24 h at 37 °C, the wells were washed by immersion in water and excess water was removed by inverting plates onto a paper towel. The wells were then filled with 100 μL of crystal violet (0.1%) and the plate was incubated for 2 min at room temperature. After removal of the crystal violet solution, the plate was washed and dried in a 37 °C incubator for 30 min and 100 μL of ethanol (70%) were added to the wells. Absorbance was measured at 590 nm using a spectrophotometer (Powerwave, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).

Scanning laser confocal microscopy

The same biofilm assay protocol was used as described previously. After the 6 or 24 h incubation, the wells were filled with 100 μL of Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA)–Oregon Green 488 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) diluted 1/100 in PBS and the plate was incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The plate was then washed with water and filled with PBS. The plate was observed with a confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000 IX81). WGA was excited at 488 nm and detected using 520 nm filters. The images were processed using Fluoview software (Olympus).

Transcriptomic microarray experiments

RNA extractions

For the microarray experiments, BHI-A or BHI-B broths were inoculated with 500 μL of an overnight culture of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 strain S4074 and grown at 37 °C in an orbital shaker until an optical density of 0.6 was reached. Ice-cold RNA degradation stop solution (95% ethanol, 5% buffer-saturated phenol), shown to effectively prevent RNA degradation and therefore preserve the integrity of the transcriptome [2], was added to the bacterial culture at a ratio of 1:10 (vol/vol). The sample was mixed by inversion, incubated on ice for 5 min, and then spun at 5 000 g for 10 min to pellet the cells. Bacterial RNA isolation was then carried out using the QIAGEN RNeasy MiniKit (QIAGEN, Mississauga, ON, Canada), as prescribed by the manufacturer. During the extraction, samples were subjected to an on-column DNase treatment, as suggested by the manufacturer and then treated with Turbo DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) to ensure that all DNA contaminants were eliminated. The RNA concentration, quality and integrity were assessed spectrophotometrically and on gel.

Microarray construction and design

For the construction of AppChip2, 2033 ORFs from the complete genome sequence of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 5b strain L20, representing more than 95% of all ORFs with a length greater than 160 nt, were amplified and spotted in duplicate on the chip. Spotted sheared genomic DNA from A. pleuropneumoniae L20 and porcine DNA are used as controls (GEO: GPL6658). Additional information concerning chip production is described by Gouré et al. [13].

Microarray hybridizations

cDNA synthesis and microarray hybridizations were performed as described [6]. Briefly, equal amounts (15 μg) of test RNA and control RNA were used to set up a standard reverse transcription reaction using random octamers (BioCorp, Montreal, QC, Canada), SuperScript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and aminoallyl-dUTP (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the resulting cDNA was indirectly labelled using a monofunctional NHS-ester Cy3 or Cy5 dye (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK). The labelling efficiency was assessed spectrophotometrically. Labelled samples were then combined and added to the AppChip2 for overnight hybridization. Five hybridizations were performed for the serotype 1 strain S4074 BHI-A versus BHI-B experiments. All slides were scanned using a Perkin-Elmer ScanArray Express scanner.

Microarray analysis and bioinformatics

Microarray data analysis was conducted with the TM4 Suite of software from the J. Craig Venture Institute [30] as described by Deslandes et al. [9]. Briefly, raw data was first generated using SpotFinder v.3.1.1. Locally weighted linear regression (lowess) was then performed in the Microarray Data Analysis System (MIDAS) in order to normalize the data. The Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) algorithm [33], which is implemented in TIGR Microarray Expression Viewer (TMEV), was used to generate a list of differentially expressed genes. During SAM analysis, a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0% was estimated for the serotype 1 strain S4074 BHI-A versus BHI-B experiments.

Effects of DspB and zinc on biofilm formation

Biofilms were grown for 6 or 24 h in BHI-B as described above. The wells were washed with water and then filled with 100 μL of PBS containing 0.2, 2.0 or 20 μg/mL of DspB (Kane Biotech Inc, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) as described by Izano et al. [17]. After incubation at 37 °C for 5 min, the wells were rinsed with water and stained with crystal violet. To monitor the effect of zinc on biofilm formation, bacteria were grown for 6 or 24 h in BHI-B supplemented with 50–250 μg/mL of ZnCl2.

Statistical analysis

The statistical significance (p value) of differences in biofilm phenotypes (mean optical density values) was determined by a paired, one-tailed t-test using GraphPad Prism version 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

RESULTS

Biofilm formation and growth conditions

The ability of the A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 reference strain S4074 to form biofilms was evaluated using different growth media (Fig. 1). No biofilm was present in the wells containing bacterial cells grown in LB broth while only a slight biofilm was observed in wells containing cells grown in TSB, MH or BHI-A broths after 24 h of incubation. However a pronounced biofilm (p < 0.01) was formed when strain S4074 was grown in BHI-B broth. This was not due to an increased growth in BHI-B compared to BHI-A as similar growth curves were observed in both media.
Figure 1.

Biofilm formation by A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 reference strain S4074 grown in different culture media using the crystal violet staining protocol described in Materials and methods. LB: Luria-Bertani; TSB: tryptic soy broth; M-H: Mueller Hinton; BHI: brain heart infusion.

Biofilm formation by A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 reference strain S4074 grown in different culture media using the crystal violet staining protocol described in Materials and methods. LB: Luria-Bertani; TSB: tryptic soy broth; M-H: Mueller Hinton; BHI: brain heart infusion. We then evaluated biofilm formation by all the reference strains of A. pleuropneumoniae after growth for 6 or 24 h in BHI-B. Similarly to what was observed with the serotype 1, we found that growth in BHI-B, but not BHI-A, allows biofilm formation in reference strains representing serotypes 4, 5a and 14. In addition to the already reported biofilm formation in serotypes 5b and 11, we also observed biofilms for serotype 3 and 12 reference strains. Moreover, biofilm formation (OD590nm > 0.1) was observed in 20 (54%) of the 37 fresh field isolates of serotypes 1, 5, 7 and 15 that were tested (Fig. 2). In general, serotypes 5a, 5b and 7 field isolates tend to form more biofilms (mean OD of 1.15, 1.47 and 1.47 after 24 h) than isolates from serotypes 1 and 15 (mean OD of 0.36 and 0.80 after 24 h).
Figure 2.

Thirty-seven independent fresh field isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae (representing serotypes 1, 5, 7 and 15) were tested for their ability to form biofilms when grown for 6 h (A) and 24 h (B) in BHI-B using the microtiter plate assay.

Thirty-seven independent fresh field isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae (representing serotypes 1, 5, 7 and 15) were tested for their ability to form biofilms when grown for 6 h (A) and 24 h (B) in BHI-B using the microtiter plate assay. When A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074 grown in BHI-A (no or slight biofilm) was transferred to BHI-B we observed the formation of a pronounced biofilm (p < 0.05). When these cells were then transferred back to BHI-A, the phenotype returned to a slight biofilm (p < 0.05). This was also observed with field isolates representing different serotypes (data not shown). We observed that for many reference strains, including strain S4074, and field isolates, pronounced biofilms were present after a short incubation period of only 6 h (Fig. 2). The biofilm was visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy using a fluorescent probe (WGA-Oregon Green) specific to the PGA matrix polysaccharide (Fig. 3). It is evident from these micrographs that A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074 does not form biofilm when grown in BHI-A while a thick PGA matrix is formed by A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 5b strain L20 grown in the same condition. However, both strains showed a pronounced biofilm when grown in BHI-B. In the case of strain S4074, the biofilm is even more important after 6 h than 24 h of incubation (Fig. 3). Because scanning laser confocal microscopy allows optical sectioning of the biofilm either in the horizontal or the vertical dimension it is possible to evaluate the thickness of the biofilm. We evaluated the thickness of A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074 biofilm to be of ~ 25 μm after growth in BHI-B for 6 h (Fig. 3C) and even greater (~ 65 μm) for A. pleuropneumoniae strain L20.
Figure 3.

Confocal scanning laser microscopic images of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 strain S4074 (A and C) and serotype 5b strain L20 (B) biofilms stained with WGA-Oregon Green 488. (C) Stack of sections through the X–Z plane of a biofilm formed after 6 h in BHI-B. Bars = 50 μm.

Confocal scanning laser microscopic images of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 strain S4074 (A and C) and serotype 5b strain L20 (B) biofilms stained with WGA-Oregon Green 488. (C) Stack of sections through the X–Z plane of a biofilm formed after 6 h in BHI-B. Bars = 50 μm.

Transcriptomic profiling under different growth conditions

To assess the transcriptional response of A. pleuropneumoniae S4074 after growth in BHI-B compared to BHI-A, transcript profiling experiments using DNA microarrays were performed. Overall, 232 genes were significantly differentially expressed during growth in BHI-B; 152 being up-regulated and 80 being down-regulated (Tab. II). The genes that showed the highest level of up-regulation after growth in BHI-B belonged to the “amino acid biosynthesis”, “energy metabolism”, “transport and binding proteins”, “cell envelope” and “hypothetical/unknown/unclassified” functional classes (Fig. 4). Genes such as tadC and tadD (tight adherence proteins C and D), genes with homology to autotransporter adhesins (APL_0443 and APL_0104) as well as genes pgaABC involved in PGA biosynthesis were up-regulated after growth in BHI-B. A cluster of genes involved in dipeptide transport (dppABCDF) and genes involved in the synthesis of an urease (ureAEFG) were also up-regulated. Down-regulated genes after growth in BHI-B mostly belonged to the “transport and binding proteins”, “cell envelope”, “protein synthesis” and “hypothetical/unknown/unclassified” functional classes. Most notably, cys genes involved in sulphate transport systems were down-regulated, as well as a gene (APL_1096) sharing 59% identity with the DspB gene of A. actinomycetemcomitans.
Table II.

A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074 genes that are up- or down-regulated after growth in BHI-B compared to growth in BHI-A.

Locus tagGeneDescriptionFold change
Amino acid biosynthesis
APL_0728ilvHAcetolactate synthase small subunit5.707
APL_0662aspCPutative aspartate aminotransferase5.324
APL_0427gdhANADP-specific glutamate dehydrogenase4.943
APL_0727ilvIAcetolactate synthase large subunit4.204
APL_0099ilvGAcetolactate synthase isozyme II large subunit (AHAS-II)3.915
APL_1499thrCThreonine synthase3.198
APL_0097ilvDDihydroxy-acid dehydratase3.142
APL_0393leuA2-isopropylmalate synthase3.000
APL_0098ilvMAcetolactate synthase isozyme II small subunit (AHAS-II)2.934
APL_2027hisFImidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit hisF2.833
APL_0702serCPhosphoserine aminotransferase2.788
APL_0432leuB3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase2.643
APL_0899dapADihydrodipicolinate synthase2.401
APL_0211glyAGlycine/serine hydroxymethyltransferase2.398
APL_0133cysBHTH-type transcriptional regulator CysB2.340
APL_1853ilvCKetol-acid reductoisomerase2.313
APL_0072ilvEBranched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase2.001
APL_0859trpCFTryptophan biosynthesis protein trpCF1.883
APL_2025hisHImidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit hisH1.777
APL_2026hisAPhosphoribosylformimino-5-aminoimidazole carboxamide ribotide isomerase1.739
APL_1198APL_1198Putative NAD(P)H nitroreductase1.708
APL_0139leuC3-isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit 21.605
APL_1230serBPhosphoserine phosphatase1.438
APL_0620aroGPhospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase1.428
APL_1873dapESuccinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase1.380
Biosynthesis of cofactors, prosthetic groups, and carriers
APL_0207Dxs1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase (DXPS)−1.555
APL_1461menA1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoateoctaprenyltransferase−1.631
APL_0382ribDRiboflavin biosynthesis protein−1.726
APL_1408gshAGlutathione biosynthesis bifunctional protein GshAB−1.789
Cell envelope
APL_1494ftpAFine tangled pili major subunit5.705
APL_1921pgaABiofilm PGA synthesis protein PgaA precursor5.308
APL_0460plpDLipoprotein Plp43.801
APL_1923pgaCBiofilm PGA synthesis N-glycosyltransferase PgaC3.591
APL_1922pgaBBiofilm PGA synthesis lipoprotein PgaB precursor3.093
APL_0006ompP2AOuter membrane protein P22.515
APL_0550tadCTight adherence protein C1.985
APL_0442sanASanA protein1.776
APL_0549tadDTight adherence protein D1.749
APL_0332hlpBLipoprotein HlpB1.627
APL_1364gmhAPutative phosphoheptose isomerase1.386
APL_0873rlpBPutative rare lipoprotein B−1.391
APL_1028APL_1028Possible lipooligosaccharide N-acetylglucosamine glycosyltransferase−1.445
APL_0747mepAPenicillin-insensitive murein endopeptidase precursor−1.446
APL_0436mreCRod shape-determining protein MreC−1.585
APL_1086ompWOuter membrane protein W precursor−1.606
APL_1029APL_1029Hypothetical protein−1.650
APL_1424oxaAInner membrane protein OxaA−1.772
APL_0933ompP1Putative outer membrane protein precursor−2.808
Cellular processes
APL_1489TpxPutative thiol peroxidase2.252
APL_0988hktECatalase−1.461
APL_0669APL_0669Putative iron dependent peroxidase−1.483
APL_1442apxIDRTX-I toxin secretion component−1.506
APL_1346ftsYCell division protein FtsY-like protein−1.530
Central intermediary metabolism
APL_1615GstPutative glutathione S-transferase3.269
APL_1614ureEUrease accessory protein UreE2.601
APL_1613ureFUrease accessory protein UreF2.478
APL_1612ureGUrease accessory protein UreG2.165
APL_1618ureAUrease gamma subunit UreA1.653
DNA metabolism
APL_1931tagI3-methyladenine-DNA glycosidase−1.500
APL_1474dnaGDNA primase−1.551
APL_1282dnaQDNA polymerase III subunit−1.579
APL_1255parEDNA topoisomerase IV subunit−1.630
APL_1505holCDNA polymerase III subunit−1.663
Energy metabolism
APL_1197APL_11973-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase3.100
APL_0841pntBNAD(P) transhydrogenase subunit beta2.726
APL_1908xylAXylose isomerase2.243
APL_0894fdxHFormate dehydrogenase, iron-sulfur subunit2.161
APL_1425napCCytochrome c-type protein NapC2.159
APL_1799torCPentahemic c-type cytochrome2.156
APL_0892fdxGFormate dehydrogenase, nitrate-inducible, major subunit2.116
APL_1798torATrimethylamine-N-oxide reductase precursor1.977
APL_0381glpCAnaerobic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase subunit C1.919
APL_0842pntANAD(P) transhydrogenase subunit alpha1.903
APL_0895fdnIFormate dehydrogenase, cytochrome b556 subunit1.816
APL_1208adhCPutative alcohol dehydrogenase class 31.801
APL_0971APL_0971Putative acyl CoA thioester hydrolase1.796
APL_0652manBPhosphomannomutase1.677
APL_0483APL_0483Predicted nitroreductase1.668
APL_0142glxKGlycerate kinase1.564
APL_0452sucCSuccinyl-CoA synthetase beta chain1.515
APL_0461APL_0461Predicted hydrolases of the HAD superfamily1.456
APL_0687DldD-lactate dehydrogenase1.439
APL_1510gpsAGlycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD(P)+)1.414
APL_1427napHFerredoxin-type protein NapH-like protein1.360
APL_0789APL_0789Dioxygenase1.253
APL_0983tktATransketolase 21.233
APL_1036pflBFormate acetyltransferase−1.653
APL_1498mgsAMethylglyoxal synthase−1.790
APL_1840ubiC4-hydroxybenzoate synthetase (chorismate lyase)−1.952
APL_0857sdaAL-serine dehydratase−3.016
Fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism
APL_1407PsdPhosphatidylserine decarboxylase−1.419
APL_1384fabH3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase 3−1.826
APL_1385plsXFatty acid/phospholipid synthesis protein PlsX−2.706
Mobile and extrachromosomal element functions
APL_1056APL_1056Transposase1.560
APL_0985APL_0985Transposase1.271
Protein fate
APL_0871pepEPeptidase E2.551
APL_1101pepAPutative cytosol aminopeptidase1.913
APL_0254pepDAminoacyl-histidine dipeptidase1.903
APL_1883ptrAProtease 3 precursor1.680
APL_0928hscBCo-chaperone protein HscB-like protein1.377
APL_1068secFProtein-export membrane protein SecF−1.496
APL_0321dsbBDisulfide bond formation protein B−1.557
APL_1035pflAPyruvate formate-lyase 1-activating enzyme−1.774
Protein synthesis
APL_1821rpmE50S ribosomal protein L312.211
APL_0484rimKRibosomal protein S6 modification protein1.533
APL_1781rpsM30S ribosomal protein S13−1.401
APL_0205APL_0205Predicted rRNA methyltransferase−1.538
APL_0399ksgADimethyladenosine transferase−1.578
APL_0679glnSGlutaminyl-tRNA synthetase−1.584
APL_0641truBtRNA pseudouridine synthase B−1.742
APL_1383trmBtRNA (guanine-N(7)-)-methyltransferase−1.756
APL_0574APL_0574tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase−1.778
APL_0723TgtQueuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase−1.937
Purines, pyrimidines, nucleosides, and nucleotides
APL_0958purHBifunctional purine biosynthesis protein PurH1.856
APL_0593guaBInosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase1.485
APL_1343CddCytidine deaminase1.278
APL_1014deoDPurine nucleoside phosphorylase DeoD-like protein−1.430
APL_0351NdkNucleoside diphosphate kinase−1.531
APL_1839UdpUridine phosphorylase−1.617
APL_1075purAAdenylosuccinate synthetase−1.762
Regulatory functions
APL_0059narPNitrate/nitrite response regulator protein2.552
APL_0823glpRGlycerol-3-phosphate regulon repressor1.908
APL_1295argRArginine repressor1.896
APL_0126APL_0126HIT-like protein1.580
APL_0395rseAPutative sigma-E factor negative regulatory protein1.524
APL_1668rbsRRibose operon repressor1.302
APL_1270sprTPutative SprT-like protein−1.483
APL_1233malTHTH-type transcriptional regulator MalT−1.484
APL_1540tldDTldD-like protein−1.578
Transcription
APL_0560rhlBATP-dependent RNA helicase RhlB1.409
APL_0423rnhARibonuclease HI1.345
APL_0201nusBTranscription antitermination protein NusB−1.457
Transport and binding proteins
APL_0967gltSSodium/glutamate symport carrier protein4.155
APL_0377glpTGlycerol-3-phosphate transporter3.247
APL_0064dppAPeriplasmic dipeptide transport protein3.168
APL_0869abgBAminobenzoyl-glutamate utilization-like protein3.004
APL_1857merPCopper chaperone MerP2.911
APL_0068dppFDipeptide transport ATP-binding protein DppF2.860
APL_1665gntP_1Gluconate permease2.723
APL_0066dppCDipeptide transport system permease protein DppC2.640
APL_1440znuAHigh-affinity zinc uptake system protein ZnuA precursor2.600
APL_0065dppBDipeptide transport system permease protein DppB2.229
APL_0067dppDDipeptide transport ATP-binding protein DppD2.036
APL_1448afuCFerric ABC transporter ATP-binding protein1.855
APL_1319ptsBPTS system sucrose-specific EIIBC component1.744
APL_1320thiQThiamine transport ATP-binding protein ThiQ1.569
APL_1622cbiMPredicted ABC transport permease protein CbiM1.433
APL_1620cbiOPredicted ABC transport ATP-binding protein CbiO1.417
APL_1173pnuCNicotinamide mononucleotide transporter1.408
APL_0749APL_0749Potassium efflux system KefA−1.436
APL_1212tehATellurite resistance protein TehA−1.543
APL_0716APL_0716Iron(III) ABC transporter, permease protein−1.547
APL_1253APL_1253Putative sodium/sulphate transporter−1.598
APL_1846cysTSulfate transport system permease protein cysT−1.684
APL_0191APL_0191Predicted Na+-dependent transporter of the SNF family−1.751
APL_1083arcDPutative arginine/ornithine antiporter−1.786
APL_2016fhuAFerrichrome-iron receptor FhuA−2.031
APL_1847cysWSulfate transport system permease protein cysW−2.195
APL_1844cysNSulphate adenylate transferase subunit 1−2.375
APL_1848cysASulfate/thiosulfate import ATP-binding protein cysA−2.401
APL_1843cysJSulfite reductase [NADPH] flavoprotein alpha-component−2.757
APL_1127APL_1127Predicted Na+/alanine symporter−3.402
Hypothetical/unknown/unclassified
APL_1100APL_1100Hypothetical protein3.395
APL_0920APL_0920Hypothetical protein2.835
APL_1882APL_1882Hypothetical protein2.776
APL_1856APL_1856Hypothetical protein2.775
APL_1855APL_1855Hypothetical protein2.763
APL_0443APL_0443Autotransporter adhesin2.762
APL_1252APL_1252Hypothetical protein2.739
APL_0134APL_0134Hypothetical protein2.681
APL_0836APL_0836Putative transcriptional regulator2.661
APL_1588APL_1588Predicted TRAP transporter solute receptor2.464
APL_1491APL_1491Hypothetical protein2.282
APL_0104APL_0104Autotransporter adhesin2.231
APL_1069ftnAFerritin-like protein 12.194
APL_1059APL_1059Hypothetical transposase-like protein2.172
APL_1690APL_1690Inner membrane protein2.168
APL_0245APL_0245Transferrin binding protein-like solute binding protein2.097
APL_1191namANADPH dehydrogenase2.078
APL_1948APL_1948Hypothetical protein2.061
APL_0870APL_0870Putative C4-dicarboxylate transporter2.034
APL_0643APL_0643Hypothetical protein2.029
APL_1743APL_1743Ser/Thr protein phosphatase family protein1.999
APL_0426APL_0426Hypothetical protein1.994
APL_1791APL_1791Putative periplasmic iron/siderophore binding protein1.944
APL_0970APL_0970Hypothetical protein1.908
APL_1070ftnBFerritin-like protein 21.907
APL_1894APL_1894Hypothetical protein1.907
APL_1374APL_1374Hypothetical protein1.803
APL_1206APL_1206Plasmid stability-like protein1.794
APL_1881APL_1881Hypothetical protein1.792
APL_0038APL_0038Hypothetical protein1.730
APL_1355APL_1355Hypothetical protein1.716
APL_0471APL_0471Hypothetical protein1.707
APL_1438APL_1438Hypothetical protein1.689
APL_1437APL_1437Hypothetical protein1.643
APL_1423APL_1423Hypothetical protein1.612
APL_0125APL_0125Hypothetical protein1.608
APL_0096APL_0096Zinc transporter family protein ZIP1.592
APL_0220APL_0220Putative lipoprotein1.583
APL_1934APL_1934Hypothetical protein1.570
APL_1574APL_1574Hypothetical protein1.543
APL_0036APL_0036Hypothetical protein1.533
APL_0222APL_0222Putative lipoprotein1.518
APL_1088APL_1088Hypothetical protein1.512
APL_1207APL_1207Hypothetical protein1.510
APL_0463APL_0463Predicted sortase and related acyltransferases1.448
APL_1859APL_1859Probable NADH-dependent butanol dehydrogenase 11.448
APL_1828APL_1828PilT protein-like protein1.447
APL_0433msrBMethionine sulfoxide reductase B1.415
APL_1189APL_1189Hypothetical protein1.393
APL_0090APL_0090Hypothetical protein1.360
APL_1709APL_1709Hypothetical protein−1.307
APL_0357APL_0357Hypothetical protein−1.328
APL_1380APL_1380Hypothetical protein−1.394
APL_1729APL_1729Hypothetical protein−1.401
APL_1062APL_1062Hypothetical protein−1.468
APL_0179APL_0179Hypothetical protein−1.481
APL_0940APL_0940Hypothetical protein−1.482
APL_1273APL_1273Putative fimbrial biogenesis and twitching motility protein PilF-like protein−1.488
APL_1131APL_1131Hypothetical protein−1.540
APL_0583APL_0583Hypothetical protein−1.585
APL_1096APL_1096Hypothetical protein (59% ID dispersine B)−1.594
APL_0936APL_0936Hypothetical protein−1.616
APL_1115APL_1115Hypothetical protein−1.639
APL_0811APL_0811Hypothetical protein−1.682
APL_1898ap2029Hypothetical protein−1.798
APL_1654gidBMethyltransferase GidB−1.816
APL_0340APL_0340Hypothetical protein−1.893
APL_1381APL_1381Hypothetical protein−1.926
APL_0053typAGTP-binding protein−2.043
APL_1681APL_1681Hypothetical protein−2.233
Figure 4.

Functional classification of the differentially expressed genes during growth of A. pleuropneumoniae S4074 in BHI-B according to TIGRFAM. AAB: amino acids biosynthesis; BCPC: biosynthesis of cofactors, prosthetic groups and carriers; CE: cell envelope; CP: cellular processes; CIM: central intermediary metabolism; DNA: DNA metabolism; EM: energy metabolism; FAPM: fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism; HUU: hypothetical proteins/unclassified/unknown; MEEF: mobile and extrachromosomal element functions; PF: protein fate; PS: protein synthesis; PPNN: purines, pyrimidines, nucleosides and nucleotides; RF: regulatory functions; TR: transcription and TBP: transport and binding proteins.

Functional classification of the differentially expressed genes during growth of A. pleuropneumoniae S4074 in BHI-B according to TIGRFAM. AAB: amino acids biosynthesis; BCPC: biosynthesis of cofactors, prosthetic groups and carriers; CE: cell envelope; CP: cellular processes; CIM: central intermediary metabolism; DNA: DNA metabolism; EM: energy metabolism; FAPM: fatty acid and phospholipid metabolism; HUU: hypothetical proteins/unclassified/unknown; MEEF: mobile and extrachromosomal element functions; PF: protein fate; PS: protein synthesis; PPNN: purines, pyrimidines, nucleosides and nucleotides; RF: regulatory functions; TR: transcription and TBP: transport and binding proteins. A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074 genes that are up- or down-regulated after growth in BHI-B compared to growth in BHI-A.

Effect of DspB on biofilm formation

Enzymatic treatment with DspB of biofilms of A. pleuropneumoniae strains S4074 and L20 grown for 6 or 24 h almost completely dispersed them (p < 0.05) confirming the presence of PGA in the biofilm matrix.

Effect of zinc on biofilm formation

Chemical analysis showed differences in some divalent cations concentration between BHI-A (Fe < 0.10 ppm, Zn 2.03 ppm) and BHI-B (Fe 0.10 ppm, Zn 1.75 ppm) while no differences were observed for others (Ca, Cu, Mg, Mn). We therefore hypothesized that the difference in biofilm formation observed after growth in BHI-B compared to BHI-A might be due to cations concentration. Since the concentration of zinc was found to be higher in BHI-A (no or slight biofilm) we tested a possible inhibitory effect of this cation on biofilm formation. The addition of ZnCl2 to BHI-B inhibited, in a dose-dependent manner, the formation of biofilms by A. pleuropneumoniae strains S4074 and L20 (Fig. 5). A complete inhibition (p < 0.01) was observed when 100 μg/mL of ZnCl2 was added to BHI-B, a concentration which did not affect growth after 24 h (data not shown). A similar inhibition was also observed with the addition of ZnSO4, ZnO, and Zn3(PO4)2 but not with MgCl2 or CaCl2 thus confirming that the inhibition was due to the addition of zinc. Biofilm formation in A. actinomycetemcomitans was also inhibited by zinc (data not shown). Interestingly, genes potentially involved in zinc transport (znuA and APL_0096) were up-regulated after growth in BHI-B (Tab. II).
Figure 5.

Effect of the addition of ZnCl2 on biofilm formation by A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 strain S4074 (App1) and serotype 5b strain L20 (App5b) grown for 6 h.

Effect of the addition of ZnCl2 on biofilm formation by A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 strain S4074 (App1) and serotype 5b strain L20 (App5b) grown for 6 h.

DISCUSSION

Biofilm formation is an important virulence trait of many bacterial pathogens including A. pleuropneumoniae. It has been previously reported that only 2 of the 15 A. pleuropneumoniae reference strains, representing serotypes 5b and 11, were able to form a biofilm in vitro [21]. We observed however an increased stickiness of colonies when strain A. pleuropneumoniae S4074 was grown on plates made of BHI from one of two different suppliers. In addition, Li et al. [24] recently observed slight biomass of biofilm when the A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 reference strain S4074 was grown in serum-free TSB and that an enhanced biofilm formation was observed in luxS [24] and hns [8] mutants of A. pleuropneumoniae S4074. These observations brought us to re-evaluate biofilm formation by strain A. pleuropneumoniae S4074 under different growth conditions using a standard microtiter plate and crystal violet staining protocol. Our data indicate that strain S4074 has the ability to form a pronounced biofilm when grown in the appropriate conditions, and that the biofilm was sensitive to DspB treatment and can be inhibited by zinc. Transition from a biofilm-positive to a biofilm-negative phenotype is not irreversible in contrast to what was reported by Kaplan and Mulks [21] under different conditions. Transcript profiling experiments using DNA microarrays indicated that overall, 232 genes were significantly differentially expressed during growth in BHI-B. Genes such as tadC, tadD, genes with homology to autotransporter adhesins as well as genes pgaABC involved in PGA biosynthesis were up-regulated after growth in BHI-B. While we can hypothesize that these genes might be important for the formation of the biofilm itself, it is also interesting to note that many of the same genes (tadB, rcpA, gene APL_0443 with high homology to the Hsf autotransporter adhesin of Haemophilus influenzae as well as genes pgaBC involved in biofilm biosynthesis) were up-regulated, when the transcriptomic profile of A. pleuropneumoniae was determined after contact with porcine lung epithelial cells [1], thus emphasizing the possible importance of biofilm formation for the establishment of the infection. Initial steps in biofilm development require the transcription, early on, of genes involved in reversible attachment and motility, before a subsequent switch towards the transcription of genes involved in the irreversible attachment of bacteria [35]. This second irreversible attachment might require the synthesis of adhesive organelles, such as the curli fibers (csg genes). Interestingly, gene APL_0220 is a putative lipoprotein of the CsgG family, responsible for the transport and assembly of curli fibers. The up-regulation of other genes possibly involved in adhesion processes (tadC, tadD, Hsf homolog APL_0443) might indicate that bacterial cells were entering or in the middle of this irreversible attachment phase. In A. actinomycetemcomitans, the Tad locus is essential for biofilm formation [32]. The fact that the transcription of a zinc-specific transporter (znuA) was increased, combined with the decrease in transcription of an hypothetical Zn-dependant protease (APL_1898) and lower concentration of this metal in BHI-B lead us to believe that Zn restriction might be a signal leading to increase biofilm formation. It is tempting to speculate that growth in BHI-B affected the expression of regulators which in turn affected PGA expression and biofilm formation. Indeed, it has been recently shown that an enhanced biofilm formation was observed in a hns mutant of A. pleuropneumoniae strain S4074 [8] and that over-expression of RpoE in a rseA mutant is sufficient to alleviate repression of biofilm formation by H-NS1. However, other genes have been shown to affect biofilm formation in A. pleuropneumoniae. An enhanced biofilm formation was observed in a quorum sensing (luxS) mutant [24] while a mutant in the ArcAB two-component system facilitating metabolic adaptation to anaerobicity (arcA) [5] and an autotransporter serine protease (AasP) mutant were deficient in biofilm formation [31]. It is interesting to note that many genes involved in branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis (ilv genes) were up-regulated after growth in BHI-B. Limitation of branched-chain amino acids was shown to be a cue for expression of a subset of in vivo induced genes in A. pleuropneumoniae, including not only genes involved in the biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids, but also other genes that are induced during infection of the natural host [34]. Our data indicate that many strains of A. pleuropneumoniae have the ability to form biofilms under appropriate growth conditions. This is an important observation considering that A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm cells exhibit increased resistance to antibiotics compared to planktonic cells [17] and may also exhibit increased resistance to biocides [12]. Biofilms are often associated with chronic infections but the fact that A. pleuropneumoniae can form an important biofilm after only 6 h of incubation suggests that biofilm formation might also play a role in acute infections. We have undertaken the screen of a large library of mini-Tn10 isogenic mutants of A. pleuropneumoniae S4074 in order to identify other genes that are involved in biofilm formation and/or regulation. A better understanding of biofilm formation in A. pleuropneumoniae might lead to the development of molecules or strategies to interfere with biofilm formation and prevent infection in pigs. In that respect, we made an important, and unexpected, observation that zinc could completely inhibit biofilm formation in A. pleuropneumoniae and A. actinomycetemcomitans, which also synthesizes PGA [20]. We do not know at this time how zinc interferes with PGA biosynthesis and biofilm formation but some glycosyltransferases have been shown to be inhibited by zinc [23]. Hypozincemia which occurs during infection and inflammation [26] might therefore favour biofilm formation by A. pleuropneumoniae. Knowing that PGA functions as a biofilm matrix polysaccharide in phylogenetically diverse bacterial species such as Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and Escherichia coli [20], it would be worth investigating whether zinc can also interfere with PGA biosynthesis in these other bacterial pathogens.
  32 in total

1.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.

Authors:  V G Tusher; R Tibshirani; G Chu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: pathobiology and pathogenesis of infection.

Authors:  Janine T Bossé; Håkan Janson; Brian J Sheehan; Amanda J Beddek; Andrew N Rycroft; J Simon Kroll; Paul R Langford
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.700

3.  TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis.

Authors:  A I Saeed; V Sharov; J White; J Li; W Liang; N Bhagabati; J Braisted; M Klapa; T Currier; M Thiagarajan; A Sturn; M Snuffin; A Rezantsev; D Popov; A Ryltsov; E Kostukovich; I Borisovsky; Z Liu; A Vinsavich; V Trush; J Quackenbush
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 4.  Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases.

Authors:  Luanne Hall-Stoodley; J William Costerton; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 5.  Role of lipo-oligosaccharides and lipopolysaccharides in bacterial adherence.

Authors:  M Jacques
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Proposal of a new serovar of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: serovar 15.

Authors:  P J Blackall; H L B M Klaasen; H van den Bosch; P Kuhnert; J Frey
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 7.  Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae surface polysaccharides: their role in diagnosis and immunogenicity.

Authors:  J D Dubreuil; M Jacques; K R Mittal; M Gottschalk
Journal:  Anim Health Res Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.615

Review 8.  Surface polysaccharides and iron-uptake systems of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  Mario Jacques
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.310

9.  Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays.

Authors:  Jonathan A Bernstein; Arkady B Khodursky; Pei-Hsun Lin; Sue Lin-Chao; Stanley N Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genome-wide expression analyses of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 reveals coordinate regulation of motility and virulence by flhA.

Authors:  Catherine D Carrillo; Eduardo Taboada; John H E Nash; Patricia Lanthier; John Kelly; Peter C Lau; Rachel Verhulp; Oksana Mykytczuk; Jonathan Sy; Wendy A Findlay; Kingsley Amoako; Susantha Gomis; Philip Willson; John W Austin; Andy Potter; Lorne Babiuk; Brenda Allan; Christine M Szymanski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  23 in total

1.  Transcriptional profiling of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae during the acute phase of a natural infection in pigs.

Authors:  Vincent Deslandes; Martine Denicourt; Christiane Girard; Josée Harel; John H E Nash; Mario Jacques
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 2.  [Bacterial biofilms: their importance in animal health and public health].

Authors:  Yannick D N Tremblay; Skander Hathroubi; Mario Jacques
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Identification of FtpA, a Dps-Like Protein Involved in Anti-Oxidative Stress and Virulence in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Qiuhong Zhang; Weiyao Han; Zhenyue Wang; Siqi Pang; Han Zhu; Kangning Tan; Xiao Liu; Paul R Langford; Qi Huang; Rui Zhou; Lu Li
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.476

Review 4.  Virulence factors of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae involved in colonization, persistence and induction of lesions in its porcine host.

Authors:  Koen Chiers; Tine De Waele; Frank Pasmans; Richard Ducatelle; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Changes in gene expression of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in response to anaerobic stress reveal induction of central metabolism and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Lu Li; Jiawen Zhu; Kui Yang; Zhuofei Xu; Ziduo Liu; Rui Zhou
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  The RNA chaperone Hfq promotes fitness of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae during porcine pleuropneumonia.

Authors:  Sargurunathan Subashchandrabose; Rhiannon M Leveque; Roy N Kirkwood; Matti Kiupel; Martha H Mulks
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Regulation of pga operon expression and biofilm formation in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by sigmaE and H-NS.

Authors:  Janine T Bossé; Sunita Sinha; Ming-Shi Li; Clíona A O'Dwyer; John H E Nash; Andrew N Rycroft; J Simon Kroll; Paul R Langford
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Surface Polysaccharide Mutants Reveal that Absence of O Antigen Reduces Biofilm Formation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.

Authors:  S Hathroubi; M A Hancock; J T Bossé; P R Langford; Y D N Tremblay; J Labrie; M Jacques
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Transcriptional portrait of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae during acute disease--potential strategies for survival and persistence in the host.

Authors:  Kirstine Klitgaard; Carsten Friis; Tim K Jensen; Øystein Angen; Mette Boye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae genes expression in biofilms cultured under static conditions and in a drip-flow apparatus.

Authors:  Yannick D N Tremblay; Vincent Deslandes; Mario Jacques
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.