OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prospective relationship between alcohol consumption and incident mobility limitation. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The Health Aging and Body Composition study, conducted in Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand sixty-one adults aged 70 to 79 without mobility disability at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of mobility limitation, defined as self-report at two consecutive semiannual interviews of any difficulty walking one-quarter of a mile or climbing stairs, and incidence of mobility disability, defined as severe difficulty or inability to perform these tasks at two consecutive reports. Alcohol intake, lifestyle-related variables, diseases, and health status indicators were assessed at baseline. RESULTS: During a follow-up time of 6.5 years, participants consuming moderate levels of alcohol had the lowest incidence of mobility limitation (total: 6.4 per 100 person-years (person-years); men: 6.4 per 100 person-years; women: 7.3 per 100 person-years) and mobility disability (total: 2.7 per 100 person-years; men: 2.5 per 100 person-years; women: 2.9 per 100 person-years). Adjusting for demographic characteristics, moderate alcohol intake was associated with lower risk of mobility limitation (hazard ratio (HR)=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.55-0.89) and mobility disability (HR=0.66, 95% CI=0.45-0.95) than never or occasional consumption. Additional adjustment for lifestyle-related variables substantially reduced the strength of the associations (HR=0.85, 95% CI=0.66-1.08 and HR=0.81, 95% CI=0.56-1.18, respectively). Adjustment for diseases and health status indicators did not affect the strength of the associations, suggesting that lifestyle is most important in confounding this relationship. CONCLUSION: Lifestyle-related characteristics mainly accounted for the association between moderate alcohol intake and lower risk of functional decline over time. These findings do not support a direct causal effect of alcohol intake on physical function.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prospective relationship between alcohol consumption and incident mobility limitation. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The Health Aging and Body Composition study, conducted in Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand sixty-one adults aged 70 to 79 without mobility disability at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of mobility limitation, defined as self-report at two consecutive semiannual interviews of any difficulty walking one-quarter of a mile or climbing stairs, and incidence of mobility disability, defined as severe difficulty or inability to perform these tasks at two consecutive reports. Alcohol intake, lifestyle-related variables, diseases, and health status indicators were assessed at baseline. RESULTS: During a follow-up time of 6.5 years, participants consuming moderate levels of alcohol had the lowest incidence of mobility limitation (total: 6.4 per 100 person-years (person-years); men: 6.4 per 100 person-years; women: 7.3 per 100 person-years) and mobility disability (total: 2.7 per 100 person-years; men: 2.5 per 100 person-years; women: 2.9 per 100 person-years). Adjusting for demographic characteristics, moderate alcohol intake was associated with lower risk of mobility limitation (hazard ratio (HR)=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.55-0.89) and mobility disability (HR=0.66, 95% CI=0.45-0.95) than never or occasional consumption. Additional adjustment for lifestyle-related variables substantially reduced the strength of the associations (HR=0.85, 95% CI=0.66-1.08 and HR=0.81, 95% CI=0.56-1.18, respectively). Adjustment for diseases and health status indicators did not affect the strength of the associations, suggesting that lifestyle is most important in confounding this relationship. CONCLUSION: Lifestyle-related characteristics mainly accounted for the association between moderate alcohol intake and lower risk of functional decline over time. These findings do not support a direct causal effect of alcohol intake on physical function.
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; A S Leon; D R Jacobs; H J Montoye; J F Sallis; R S Paffenbarger Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kenneth J Mukamal; Murray A Mittleman; W T Longstreth; Anne B Newman; Linda P Fried; David S Siscovick Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth González-Rubio; Ismael San Mauro; Cristina López-Ruíz; Ligia E Díaz-Prieto; Ascensión Marcos; Esther Nova Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Swati Sakhuja; John N Booth; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Cora E Lewis; Stephen J Thomas; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; James M Shikany; Mario Sims; Yuichiro Yano; Paul Muntner Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.080
Authors: Yaoyue Hu; Hynek Pikhart; Sofia Malyutina; Andrzej Pajak; Ruzena Kubinova; Yuri Nikitin; Anne Peasey; Michael Marmot; Martin Bobak Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Richard G Watt; Anja Heilmann; Wael Sabbah; Tim Newton; Tarani Chandola; Jun Aida; Aubrey Sheiham; Michael Marmot; Ichiro Kawachi; Georgios Tsakos Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 3.295