Literature DB >> 19736924

Importance of ligand reorganization free energy in protein-ligand binding-affinity prediction.

Chao-Yie Yang1, Haiying Sun, Jianyong Chen, Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska, Shaomeng Wang.   

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the binding affinities of small-molecule ligands to their biological targets is fundamental for structure-based drug design but remains a very challenging task. In this paper, we have performed computational studies to predict the binding models of 31 small-molecule Smac (the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase) mimetics to their target, the XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis) protein, and their binding affinities. Our results showed that computational docking was able to reliably predict the binding models, as confirmed by experimentally determined crystal structures of some Smac mimetics complexed with XIAP. However, all the computational methods we have tested, including an empirical scoring function, two knowledge-based scoring functions, and MM-GBSA (molecular mechanics and generalized Born surface area), yield poor to modest prediction for binding affinities. The linear correlation coefficient (r(2)) value between the predicted affinities and the experimentally determined affinities was found to be between 0.21 and 0.36. Inclusion of ensemble protein-ligand conformations obtained from molecular dynamic simulations did not significantly improve the prediction. However, major improvement was achieved when the free-energy change for ligands between their free- and bound-states, or "ligand-reorganization free energy", was included in the MM-GBSA calculation, and the r(2) value increased from 0.36 to 0.66. The prediction was validated using 10 additional Smac mimetics designed and evaluated by an independent group. This study demonstrates that ligand reorganization free energy plays an important role in the overall binding free energy between Smac mimetics and XIAP. This term should be evaluated for other ligand-protein systems and included in the development of new scoring functions. To our best knowledge, this is the first computational study to demonstrate the importance of ligand reorganization free energy for the prediction of protein-ligand binding free energy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19736924      PMCID: PMC2773700          DOI: 10.1021/ja9039373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  29 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models.

Authors:  P A Kollman; I Massova; C Reyes; B Kuhn; S Huo; L Chong; M Lee; T Lee; Y Duan; W Wang; O Donini; P Cieplak; J Srinivasan; D A Case; T E Cheatham
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 3.  Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects.

Authors:  D Bashford; D A Case
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.703

4.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Yipin Lu; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-06-05       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Free energy calculations for theophylline binding to an RNA aptamer: Comparison of MM-PBSA and thermodynamic integration methods.

Authors:  Hiroaki Gouda; Irwin D Kuntz; David A Case; Peter A Kollman
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Orally bioavailable antagonists of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins based on an azabicyclooctane scaffold.

Authors:  Frederick Cohen; Bruno Alicke; Linda O Elliott; John A Flygare; Tatiana Goncharov; Stephen F Keteltas; Matthew C Franklin; Stacy Frankovitz; Jean-Philippe Stephan; Vickie Tsui; Domagoj Vucic; Harvey Wong; Wayne J Fairbrother
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Structural basis for binding of Smac/DIABLO to the XIAP BIR3 domain.

Authors:  Z Liu; C Sun; E T Olejniczak; R P Meadows; S F Betz; T Oost; J Herrmann; J C Wu; S W Fesik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Structural basis of IAP recognition by Smac/DIABLO.

Authors:  G Wu; J Chai; T L Suber; J W Wu; C Du; X Wang; Y Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Molecular dynamics simulations of alcohol dehydrogenase with a four- or five-coordinate catalytic zinc ion.

Authors:  U Ryde
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-01
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Blind tests of RNA-protein binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Kalli Kappel; Inga Jarmoskaite; Pavanapuresan P Vaidyanathan; William J Greenleaf; Daniel Herschlag; Rhiju Das
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

4.  A potent and orally active antagonist (SM-406/AT-406) of multiple inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) in clinical development for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Qian Cai; Haiying Sun; Yuefeng Peng; Jianfeng Lu; Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska; Donna McEachern; Liu Liu; Su Qiu; Chao-Yie Yang; Rebecca Miller; Han Yi; Tao Zhang; Duxin Sun; Sanmao Kang; Ming Guo; Lance Leopold; Dajun Yang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.507

6.  Role of Ligand Reorganization and Conformational Restraints on the Binding Free Energies of DAPY Non-Nucleoside Inhibitors to HIV Reverse Transcriptase.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  Comput Mol Biosci       Date:  2012-03

7.  The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Mauro Lapelosa; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  The measured and calculated affinity of methyl- and methoxy-substituted benzoquinones for the Q(A) site of bacterial reaction centers.

Authors:  Zhong Zheng; P Leslie Dutton; M R Gunner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-09

9.  Complementarity between a docking and a high-throughput screen in discovering new cruzain inhibitors.

Authors:  Rafaela S Ferreira; Anton Simeonov; Ajit Jadhav; Oliv Eidam; Bryan T Mott; Michael J Keiser; James H McKerrow; David J Maloney; John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Bayesian Model Averaging for Ensemble-Based Estimates of Solvation-Free Energies.

Authors:  Luke J Gosink; Christopher C Overall; Sarah M Reehl; Paul D Whitney; David L Mobley; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.