Literature DB >> 19735339

An integrative review and meta-synthesis of the scope and impact of intensive care liaison and outreach services.

Ruth Endacott1, Suzanne Eliott, Wendy Chaboyer.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine activities and outcomes of intensive care unit Liaison Nurse/Outreach services. The review comprised two stages: (1) integrative review of qualitative and quantitative studies examining intensive care liaison/outreach services in the UK and Australia and (2) meta-synthesis using the Nursing Role Effectiveness Model as an a priori model.
BACKGROUND: Acute ward patients are at risk of adverse events and patients recovering from critical illness are vulnerable to deterioration. Proactive and reactive strategies have been implemented to facilitate timely identification of patients at risk.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
METHODS: A range of data bases was searched from 2000-2008. Studies were eligible for review if they included adults in any setting where intensive care unit Liaison Nurse or Outreach services were provided. From 1423 citations and 65 abstracts, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: Intensive care liaison/outreach services had a beneficial impact on intensive care mortality, hospital mortality, unplanned intensive care admissions/re-admissions, discharge delay and rates of adverse events. A range of research methods were used; however, it was not possible to conclude unequivocally that the intensive care liaison/outreach service had resulted in improved outcomes. The major unmeasured benefit across all studies was improved communication pathways between critical care and ward staff. Outcomes for nurses in the form of improved confidence, knowledge and critical care skills were identified in qualitative studies but not measured.
CONCLUSION: The varied nature of the intensive care liaison/outreach services reviewed in these studies suggests that they should be treated as bundled interventions, delivering a treatment package of care. Further studies should examine the impact of critical care support on the confidence and skills of ward nurses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Advanced nursing roles can improve outcomes for patients who are vulnerable to deterioration. The Nursing Role Effectiveness Model provides a useful framework for evaluating the impact of these roles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19735339     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02914.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  9 in total

1.  Nursing-sensitive indicators: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Liza Heslop; Sai Lu; Xiaoquan Xu
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Does the implementation of a novel intensive care discharge risk score and nurse-led inpatient review tool improve outcome? A prospective cohort study in two intensive care units in the UK.

Authors:  Jez Fabes; William Seligman; Carolyn Barrett; Stuart McKechnie; John Griffiths
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Critical care in Malawi: The ethics of beneficence and justice.

Authors:  Lucinda Manda-Taylor; Samson Mndolo; Tim Baker
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.875

Review 4.  Exploring the utility of the Nursing Role Effectiveness Model in evaluating nursing contributions in primary health care: A scoping review.

Authors:  Julia A Lukewich; Joan E Tranmer; Megan C Kirkland; Anna J Walsh
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-05-16

Review 5.  Problems in care and avoidability of death after discharge from intensive care: a multi-centre retrospective case record review study.

Authors:  Sarah Vollam; Owen Gustafson; J Duncan Young; Benjamin Attwood; Liza Keating; Peter Watkinson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Medical emergency teams are associated with reduced mortality across a major metropolitan health network after two years service: a retrospective study using government administrative data.

Authors:  Antony E Tobin; John D Santamaria
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  An Integrative Literature Review of Organisational Factors Associated with Admission and Discharge Delays in Critical Care.

Authors:  Laura-Maria Peltonen; Louise McCallum; Eriikka Siirala; Marjaana Haataja; Heljä Lundgrén-Laine; Sanna Salanterä; Frances Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Unmet needs in the management of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Francisco Torres-González; Inmaculada Ibanez-Casas; Sandra Saldivia; Dinarte Ballester; Pamela Grandón; Berta Moreno-Küstner; Miguel Xavier; Manuel Gómez-Beneyto
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Physical and Mental Health of Patients Immediately After Discharge From Intensive Care Unit and 24 Hours Later.

Authors:  Marzieh Momennasab; Tahereh Ghahramani; Shahrzad Yektatalab; Farid Zand
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2016-02-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.