Literature DB >> 19735325

Phylogenetic analysis of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human and animal effluents and assessment of ruminant faecal pollution by real-time PCR.

S Mieszkin1, J-F Yala1, R Joubrel1, M Gourmelon1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the host-specific distribution of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human- and animal-related effluents and faeces, and to define a ruminant-specific marker. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene clone libraries were constructed from samples of effluent (sewage, bovine manure and pig slurry) and faeces (human, bovine, pig and wild bird), using PCR primers targeting order Bacteroidales. The phylogenetic analysis revealed six main distinct human-, bovine-, pig- and wild bird-specific clusters. From the bovine-specific cluster II, we designed a ruminant-specific marker, Rum-2-Bac, and this showed 97% sensitivity (n=30) and 100% specificity (n=40) when tested by TaqMan real-time PCR. Average concentrations of this marker in bovine and sheep faeces and in bovine manure were 8.2+/-0.5, 8.4+/-1.3 and 7+/-0.5 log10 copies per gram, respectively. It was also quantified in samples of runoff water impacted by bovine manure, with average concentrations of 5.1+/-0.3 log10 copies per millilitre water.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed that some members of Bacteroidales isolated from effluents and faeces had host-specific distributions. Identification of a bovine-specific cluster made it possible to design a reliable ruminant-specific marker. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The host-specific distribution of Bacteroidales sequences from effluents mirrored the host-specific distribution of sequences observed in individual faeces. This efficient new ruminant-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA marker represents a useful addition to the microbial source tracking toolbox.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19735325     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04499.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  27 in total

1.  Blautia and Prevotella sequences distinguish human and animal fecal pollution in Brazil surface waters.

Authors:  Amber M Koskey; Jenny C Fisher; A Murat Eren; Rafael Ponce-Terashima; Mitermayer G Reis; Ronald E Blanton; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.541

2.  Occurrence of Host-Associated Fecal Markers on Child Hands, Household Soil, and Drinking Water in Rural Bangladeshi Households.

Authors:  Alexandria B Boehm; Dan Wang; Ayse Ercumen; Meghan Shea; Angela R Harris; Orin C Shanks; Catherine Kelty; Alvee Ahmed; Zahid Hayat Mahmud; Benjamin F Arnold; Claire Chase; Craig Kullmann; John M Colford; Stephen P Luby; Amy J Pickering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2016-11-08

3.  Level of contamination in the feces of several species at major inland pollution sources in the drainage basin of Yeoja Bay, Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Sang Hyeon Jeong; Soon Bum Shin; Ji Hee Lee; Ji Young Kwon; Hee Chung Lee; Seon-Jae Kim; Kwang Soo Ha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Relevance of Bacteroidales and F-specific RNA bacteriophages for efficient fecal contamination tracking at the level of a catchment in France.

Authors:  Aourell Mauffret; Marie-Paule Caprais; Michèle Gourmelon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.

Authors:  Zachery R Staley; Josey Grabuski; Ed Sverko; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Decay of fecal indicator bacterial populations and bovine-associated source-tracking markers in freshly deposited cow pats.

Authors:  Adelumola Oladeinde; Thomas Bohrmann; Kelvin Wong; S T Purucker; Ken Bradshaw; Reid Brown; Blake Snyder; Marirosa Molina
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Discovering new indicators of fecal pollution.

Authors:  Sandra L McLellan; A Murat Eren
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 17.079

8.  PCR Assay Specific for Chicken Feces.

Authors:  Cindy R Cisar; Tatsuya Akiyama; Jonathan Hatley; Lori Arney; Nebojsa Kezunovic; Daniel Owen
Journal:  Proc Okla Acad Sci       Date:  2010

9.  Variable fecal source prioritization in recreational waters routinely monitored with viral and bacterial general indicators.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Catherine A Kelty; Mano Sivaganesan; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Extended persistence of general and cattle-associated fecal indicators in marine and freshwater environment.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Mano Sivaganesan; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.