Literature DB >> 19734552

Left bundle branch block causes relative but not absolute septal underperfusion during exercise.

Pascal Koepfli1, Christophe A Wyss, Oliver Gaemperli, Patrick T Siegrist, Michael Klainguti, Tiziano Schepis, Mehdi Namdar, Markus Bechir, Tobias Hoefflinghaus, Firat Duru, Philipp A Kaufmann.   

Abstract

AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) often causes septal perfusion defects in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging using exercise (Ex) but rarely using vasodilator stress. We studied whether this is due to an underlying structural disease inherent to spontaneous LBBB or whether it is also found in temporary LBBB induced by right ventricular pacing (PM) indicating a functional rather than a structural alteration. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and at Ex was measured with 15O-H2O and PET in 10 age-matched healthy volunteers (controls), 10 LBBB patients and 10 PM patients with right ventricular pacing off and on (PM off and PM on). Although at Ex septal MBF tended to be higher in LBBB than in controls (3.04 +/- 1.18 vs. 2.27 +/- 0.72 mL/min/g; P = ns), the ratio septal/lateral MBF was 19% lower in LBBB than in controls (P < 0.05). Similarly, switching PM on at Ex decreased the ratio septal/lateral MBF by 17% (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: The apparent septal perfusion defect in LBBB is mainly due to a relative lateral hyperperfusion rather than to an absolute septal flow decrease. This pattern seems to be reversibly inducible by right ventricular pacing, suggesting a functional rather than a structural alteration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19734552     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  The year of 2009 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Role of coronary flow regulation and cardiac-coronary coupling in mechanical dyssynchrony associated with right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Ravi Namani; Jenny S Choy; Yousif Awakeem; Ghassan S Kassab; Lik Chuan Lee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Nathan W Kong; Gaurav A Upadhyay
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Myocardial blood flow assessment with 82rubidium-PET imaging in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Andréa Falcão; William Chalela; Maria Clementina Giorgi; Rodrigo Imada; José Soares; Renata Do Val; Marco Antonio Oliveira; Marisa Izaki; Roberto Kalil Kalil Filho; José C Meneghetti
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Effect of septal flash on right ventricular systolic function in left bundle-branch block patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Guang-Yuan Li; Yong-Huai Wang; Zheng-Yu Guan; Xuan-Yi Jin; Yang Li; Shuang Liu; Chun-Yan Ma; Jun Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Low septal to lateral wall 18F-FDG ratio is highly associated with mechanical dyssynchrony in non-ischemic CRT candidates.

Authors:  Ganna Degtiarova; Piet Claus; Jürgen Duchenne; Marta Cvijic; Georg Schramm; Johan Nuyts; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Olivier Gheysens
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.138

7.  To what extent are perfusion defects seen by myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block related to myocardial infarction, ECG characteristics, and myocardial wall motion?

Authors:  Fredrik Hedeer; Ellen Ostenfeld; Bo Hedén; Frits W Prinzen; Håkan Arheden; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 5.952

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.