Literature DB >> 1973436

Induction of cytogenetic adaptive response of somatic and germ cells in vivo and in vitro by low-dose X-irradiation.

L Cai1, S Z Liu.   

Abstract

The cytogenetic adaptive response induced by low-level radiation was studied using human and rabbit lymphocytes in vitro and bone marrow cells and germ cells in vivo. The inductive dose of X-rays was 10 mGy for the in vitro studies at a dose rate of 10 mGy/min, and 2, 10, 50, 75 and 100 mGy for the in vivo studies at a dose rate of 50 mGy/min. The challenging dose was 1.5 Gy X-rays for the in vitro experiments and 0.65 or 0.75 Gy for the in vivo experiments at a dose rate of 0.44 Gy/min. The results reported here, in addition to those that have appeared in the literature, show the following characteristics documented for the first time: (1) 10 mGy could induce the adaptive response in human as well as rabbit lymphocytes irradiated not only in G1, S and G2 phases, but also in the Go state; (2) although the induced adaptive response could only last three cell cycles, it could be revived when the inductive dose was repeated after the third cell cycle; (3) the adaptive response could be induced by low-dose X-rays in somatic cells, both in vitro (lymphocytes) and in vivo (bone marrow cells), and also in germ cells (spermatocytes); (4) the magnitude of the adaptive response induced by whole-body irradiation was found to be dose-dependent--the lower the inductive dose the more the reduction of the frequency of chromatid aberrations following the challenging dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1973436     DOI: 10.1080/09553009014551541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  27 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Adaptive response and split-dose effect of radiation on the survival of mice.

Authors:  Ashu Bhan Tiku; R K Kale
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Twilight effects of low doses of ionizing radiation on cellular systems: a bird's eye view on current concepts and research.

Authors:  Ilaria Postiglione; Angela Chiaviello; Giuseppe Palumbo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  The adaptive response and protection against heritable mutations and fetal malformation.

Authors:  D R Boreham; J-A Dolling; C Somers; J Quinn; R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: evolutionary origins.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Radio-adaptive response to environmental exposures at Chernobyl.

Authors:  Brenda E Rodgers; Kristen M Holmes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  Dose-response relationship for radiation carcinogenesis in the low-dose region.

Authors:  B L Cohen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Adaptive response to mutagenesis and its molecular basis in a human T-cell leukemia line primed with a low dose of gamma-rays.

Authors:  P K Zhou; X Q Xiang; W Z Sun; X Y Liu; Y P Zhang; K Wei
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.